This topic contains 36 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Dazzling Dunks and Basketball Bloopers 10 years, 1 month ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #63794
    AvatarAvatar
    Checkbook_doc
    Participant

     I asked this last night during the Chinese storm and it got deleted, so I am reposting now.

    I am a big Jazz fan and am wondering if they can get the Laker’s pick, and if so what it would cost.

    I believe the Jazz have a team full of above average players and should be in the playoff hunt for years to come. However, they will never be in contention for a ring until they get a star. For Utah, the most realistic way to get a star is to draft one. Unfortunately, they are too good to get a top pick, so the only option is to trade for a top pick from a team looking for some really good role players. I don’t see the 6er’s having any interest, but I wanted to get your take on the following two trades for the Laker’s pick (assuming for now that the Jazz front office believes a star is available at #2):

    1) Direct trade: Jazz send Hayward, Favors, #12, and Warrior’s 1st next year to Laker’s for #2. Laker’s look at this because they want to make the playoffs this year and Hayward and Favors (plus free agent signings) make that a real possibility. Also, it makes them a more attractive destination to free agents this summer.

    2) Three team trade: Jazz send same group of assets to Kings, Kings send DMC to Lakers, Lakers send #2 to Jazz and any needed players to Kings. Lakers get a star in Cousins (Jazz have zero interest in him), Kings again would really like to be respectable and contend for the playoffs. This brings them significantly closer to the goal.

    So… do you think there would be any interest by the Kings or Lakers? Does the premise make sense?

    To clarify, I am looking for Lakers/Kings perspective, rather than if this is a good trade for the Jazz.

     

     

    0
  • #1063524
    AvatarAvatar
    high floor
    Participant

    #1 is really steep. If I were the Lakers though, I would execute that trade very quickly.

    I know you stated clearly that you weren’t looking at this from the Jazz perspective.. but the Jazz want to make the playoffs now, and losing both Hayward and Favors (plus a lotto pick) sets them back 2 years.

     

      

    0
  • #1063402
    AvatarAvatar
    high floor
    Participant

    #1 is really steep. If I were the Lakers though, I would execute that trade very quickly.

    I know you stated clearly that you weren’t looking at this from the Jazz perspective.. but the Jazz want to make the playoffs now, and losing both Hayward and Favors (plus a lotto pick) sets them back 2 years.

     

      

    0
    • #1063530
      AvatarAvatar
      Checkbook_doc
      Participant

      I agree that it is a lot, but it is based on the assumption that the Utah front office thinks Ingram/Simmons is a future top 10 player that they can guarantee to be under contract for a long time.

      I also think you need to keep in mind that Hayward has one year left on his contract and there is a fair to good chance that he leaves after next year. He already has an LA home (plus it is the Lakers) so I would be suprised if the didn’t resign with them. This is a chance for the Jazz to get assets for a player that might walk away (think Derron Williams situation). I actually think the Jazz will miss Favors as much as Hayward.

      I don’t think the Jazz want to make the playoffs, they just want to keep their fans energized. The key to a sucessful sports franchise is selling hope. Many fans are realizing that Utah will never be a serious contender as currently constructed. But if you add a star, and surround them with the good supporting cast that would remain in Utah… as a fan that would keep me more engaged than a run for the playoffs with no ring in sight.

       

       

       

      0
    • #1063408
      AvatarAvatar
      Checkbook_doc
      Participant

      I agree that it is a lot, but it is based on the assumption that the Utah front office thinks Ingram/Simmons is a future top 10 player that they can guarantee to be under contract for a long time.

      I also think you need to keep in mind that Hayward has one year left on his contract and there is a fair to good chance that he leaves after next year. He already has an LA home (plus it is the Lakers) so I would be suprised if the didn’t resign with them. This is a chance for the Jazz to get assets for a player that might walk away (think Derron Williams situation). I actually think the Jazz will miss Favors as much as Hayward.

      I don’t think the Jazz want to make the playoffs, they just want to keep their fans energized. The key to a sucessful sports franchise is selling hope. Many fans are realizing that Utah will never be a serious contender as currently constructed. But if you add a star, and surround them with the good supporting cast that would remain in Utah… as a fan that would keep me more engaged than a run for the playoffs with no ring in sight.

       

       

       

      0
    • #1063453
      AvatarAvatar
      SOI47
      Participant

      Dude.. keeping Derrick Favors and Hayward sets them back decades.

      How the hell are the Utah stinkin Jazz going to get star players in there? Its impossible unless they hit the lottery. Welcome to NBA hell.

      The idea you think the lakers would want Hayward and Favors for the #2 is a complete JOKE.

      Ingram is a future star with the potential to maybe be the best player in the NBA one day (Yes Ingram and Simmons both possess that incredible potential)

      You are getting them

      0
    • #1063576
      AvatarAvatar
      SOI47
      Participant

      Dude.. keeping Derrick Favors and Hayward sets them back decades.

      How the hell are the Utah stinkin Jazz going to get star players in there? Its impossible unless they hit the lottery. Welcome to NBA hell.

      The idea you think the lakers would want Hayward and Favors for the #2 is a complete JOKE.

      Ingram is a future star with the potential to maybe be the best player in the NBA one day (Yes Ingram and Simmons both possess that incredible potential)

      You are getting them

      0
  • #1063528
    AvatarAvatar
    daggers818
    Participant

     Totally agree with High Floor. As a big laker fan, I do your first trade for sure.  No interest in Cousins for me.  I also wouldn’t sell your Jazz short. I think they are still rising. Hang in there and build around the core with that front line. 

    0
  • #1063406
    AvatarAvatar
    daggers818
    Participant

     Totally agree with High Floor. As a big laker fan, I do your first trade for sure.  No interest in Cousins for me.  I also wouldn’t sell your Jazz short. I think they are still rising. Hang in there and build around the core with that front line. 

    0
    • #1063536
      AvatarAvatar
      Checkbook_doc
      Participant

      I think it is a good core… but what are the Jazz supposed to build around? The best player is Hayward, who is much better than most people realize (top 20?), but if he leaves then what? Best case senario for them now is the Bobcats… make the playoffs, but never have a real shot. It might be different if the league was down, but for at least the next few years it is not reasonable to expect to come out of the west (think Warriors, Thunder, Spurs, etc.).

      If the Jazz what a shot at a ring, and more importantly want to keep fans engaged, they need a star. Of course, if a star is not availible at #2 there is no point in trading… this is all under the assumption that #2 can get a future top 10 player.

      0
    • #1063414
      AvatarAvatar
      Checkbook_doc
      Participant

      I think it is a good core… but what are the Jazz supposed to build around? The best player is Hayward, who is much better than most people realize (top 20?), but if he leaves then what? Best case senario for them now is the Bobcats… make the playoffs, but never have a real shot. It might be different if the league was down, but for at least the next few years it is not reasonable to expect to come out of the west (think Warriors, Thunder, Spurs, etc.).

      If the Jazz what a shot at a ring, and more importantly want to keep fans engaged, they need a star. Of course, if a star is not availible at #2 there is no point in trading… this is all under the assumption that #2 can get a future top 10 player.

      0
      • #1063428
        AvatarAvatar
        high floor
        Participant

        As a Jazz fan, you don’t think Gobert or Exum could be a star? Hell, I’d even throw in Rodney Hood as a potential All Star. I think Hood can be really, really good & he showed off some versatility to his game that I wasn’t sure he had leading up to this year.

        Gobert disappointed a little this season, but he’s still young & full of upside. Rudy was simply worn down & had nagging injuries after playing ball all summer for his National team. I’m betting on Gobert averaging 13pts, 12rebs, and 2.5blks on 58-60% shooting from the field next year. Those are top 5 numbers for a Center, and will likely land him on the All-star team if the Jazz are above .500. Not bad at all for a 24yo Center who is actually decent from the FT stripe compared to his peers.

         

        0
        • #1063439
          AvatarAvatar
          Checkbook_doc
          Participant

           I think Hood and Gobert are good supporting players, but not better than a second or third best player on a contender. It is actually because they are good that I think a trade makes sense. Just getting a star without supporting cast does no good (e.g. Melo in NY, AD in NO).

          I believe that in a team of robins rarely beats a batman and robin combo. 

          0
        • #1063562
          AvatarAvatar
          Checkbook_doc
          Participant

           I think Hood and Gobert are good supporting players, but not better than a second or third best player on a contender. It is actually because they are good that I think a trade makes sense. Just getting a star without supporting cast does no good (e.g. Melo in NY, AD in NO).

          I believe that in a team of robins rarely beats a batman and robin combo. 

          0
      • #1063550
        AvatarAvatar
        high floor
        Participant

        As a Jazz fan, you don’t think Gobert or Exum could be a star? Hell, I’d even throw in Rodney Hood as a potential All Star. I think Hood can be really, really good & he showed off some versatility to his game that I wasn’t sure he had leading up to this year.

        Gobert disappointed a little this season, but he’s still young & full of upside. Rudy was simply worn down & had nagging injuries after playing ball all summer for his National team. I’m betting on Gobert averaging 13pts, 12rebs, and 2.5blks on 58-60% shooting from the field next year. Those are top 5 numbers for a Center, and will likely land him on the All-star team if the Jazz are above .500. Not bad at all for a 24yo Center who is actually decent from the FT stripe compared to his peers.

         

        0
  • #1063435
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

    Hayward has a player option in 2016/17 and the Lakers have Randle who plays PF so we’d have an issue of Favors alongside him.

    The first players the Lakers would want would be Gobert and Hood given their upside and that they are on rookie deals. The Jazz wouldn’t want to part with either I feel and the Jazz are too far back in the draft to make up the pick differential.

    Also I personally don’t see the Lakers passing on one of Ingram or Simmons unless they could get a legit Franchise level player.

    0
  • #1063558
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

    Hayward has a player option in 2016/17 and the Lakers have Randle who plays PF so we’d have an issue of Favors alongside him.

    The first players the Lakers would want would be Gobert and Hood given their upside and that they are on rookie deals. The Jazz wouldn’t want to part with either I feel and the Jazz are too far back in the draft to make up the pick differential.

    Also I personally don’t see the Lakers passing on one of Ingram or Simmons unless they could get a legit Franchise level player.

    0
  • #1063447
    AvatarAvatar
    SOI47
    Participant

    “I believe the Jazz have a team full of above average players and should be in the playoff hunt for years to come. However, they will never be in contention for a ring until they get a star.”

    DING DING DING!!

    So now the teams (76ers/Lakers) who WERE in the Jazz position who have since DISMANTLED their teams so that they could have a CHANCE of getting a franchise player are going to take stupid pills after hitting the lottery and give you a boost up there for your “above average players”?

    The jazz have a ZERO percent chance of trading up. They could trade their entire franchise and 5 first round picks and still not have enough.

    You cant sniff Ben Simmons and you cant sniff Ingram.. your stuck in limbo. Its a terrible place to be in the NBA.

    There are also those lunatics out there who think that those teams would consider trading Simmons or Ingram for Paul George. Let me break the news to you guys.. no one is trading Simmons for Paul George. Paul George isn’t enough.

    TS I hope you understand what is happening here. The 76ers and Lakers are the big lottery winners. They have a chance now to draft 2 future stars (potential hall of fame level talents) that are in this draft. They both have young teams that they are growing. They are smiling ear to ear. Your team would need to give a kings ransom to get those picks and the sad truth is your entire franchise doesn’t have enough value to pull off a trade.

    No one wants Derrick Favors or any of those other guys on that roster. They are just players. Nothing spectacular. Ben Simmons is being compared to Magic/Lebron and Ingram is being compared to Durant. You can’t touch that.

    You just have to accept your team is in hell. You need to tank like the 76ers/lakers/Minnasota to get back into contention.

    In this league stars are like GOLD and we know when we see a star coming out of college. They are flat out gold. We know Simmons and Ingram are studs.. its just how studly is the question now. These are franchise players. Without a superstar or stars you have no chance to win an NBA title.

    No one is going to trade you Simmons or Ingram.. both of those players immediately are some of the most valuable assets in all of the NBA. How many players are more valuable than their contracts??? NOT MANY. Steph Curry, Lebron James, Kevin Durant, Anthony Davis… I mean who else would you risk trading a future hall of famer for?

    Not Paul George and certainly not Derrick favors and a bunch of Utah starters and draft picks. You don’t touch #1 or #2 with a 10 foot pool.

    0
    • #1063730
      AvatarAvatar
      nateval
      Participant

       I would trade the first or second pick for PG. George is a guaranteed superstar and just turned 26. Philly would be an instant playoff team next season. I can’t say Simmions or Ingram are surefire NBA superstars. Don’t get me wrong I’m a Celtics fan I would be very excited to have one of those picks but I would give it up for the sure thing in George

       

       

      0
    • #1063607
      AvatarAvatar
      nateval
      Participant

       I would trade the first or second pick for PG. George is a guaranteed superstar and just turned 26. Philly would be an instant playoff team next season. I can’t say Simmions or Ingram are surefire NBA superstars. Don’t get me wrong I’m a Celtics fan I would be very excited to have one of those picks but I would give it up for the sure thing in George

       

       

      0
  • #1063570
    AvatarAvatar
    SOI47
    Participant

    “I believe the Jazz have a team full of above average players and should be in the playoff hunt for years to come. However, they will never be in contention for a ring until they get a star.”

    DING DING DING!!

    So now the teams (76ers/Lakers) who WERE in the Jazz position who have since DISMANTLED their teams so that they could have a CHANCE of getting a franchise player are going to take stupid pills after hitting the lottery and give you a boost up there for your “above average players”?

    The jazz have a ZERO percent chance of trading up. They could trade their entire franchise and 5 first round picks and still not have enough.

    You cant sniff Ben Simmons and you cant sniff Ingram.. your stuck in limbo. Its a terrible place to be in the NBA.

    There are also those lunatics out there who think that those teams would consider trading Simmons or Ingram for Paul George. Let me break the news to you guys.. no one is trading Simmons for Paul George. Paul George isn’t enough.

    TS I hope you understand what is happening here. The 76ers and Lakers are the big lottery winners. They have a chance now to draft 2 future stars (potential hall of fame level talents) that are in this draft. They both have young teams that they are growing. They are smiling ear to ear. Your team would need to give a kings ransom to get those picks and the sad truth is your entire franchise doesn’t have enough value to pull off a trade.

    No one wants Derrick Favors or any of those other guys on that roster. They are just players. Nothing spectacular. Ben Simmons is being compared to Magic/Lebron and Ingram is being compared to Durant. You can’t touch that.

    You just have to accept your team is in hell. You need to tank like the 76ers/lakers/Minnasota to get back into contention.

    In this league stars are like GOLD and we know when we see a star coming out of college. They are flat out gold. We know Simmons and Ingram are studs.. its just how studly is the question now. These are franchise players. Without a superstar or stars you have no chance to win an NBA title.

    No one is going to trade you Simmons or Ingram.. both of those players immediately are some of the most valuable assets in all of the NBA. How many players are more valuable than their contracts??? NOT MANY. Steph Curry, Lebron James, Kevin Durant, Anthony Davis… I mean who else would you risk trading a future hall of famer for?

    Not Paul George and certainly not Derrick favors and a bunch of Utah starters and draft picks. You don’t touch #1 or #2 with a 10 foot pool.

    0
  • #1063449
    AvatarAvatar
    SOI47
    Participant

    Im still laughing at Hayward, favors, #12, and Golden states 1st round pick next year (#32) for 2 LMFAO.

    You probably cant even trade up to #5 for that trash.

    You are a fan I get it.. but what you proposed is laugh out loud hilarious. Your not even close.

    Whats hilarious that you don’t realize is that neither team at this point would even trade either pick for ANTHONY DAVIS and draft picks let alone Derrick Favors and Gordon Hayward.

    It is physically and completely impossible for you A. Have the assets to make that trade B. Convince the 76ers or lakers to do it

    0
  • #1063572
    AvatarAvatar
    SOI47
    Participant

    Im still laughing at Hayward, favors, #12, and Golden states 1st round pick next year (#32) for 2 LMFAO.

    You probably cant even trade up to #5 for that trash.

    You are a fan I get it.. but what you proposed is laugh out loud hilarious. Your not even close.

    Whats hilarious that you don’t realize is that neither team at this point would even trade either pick for ANTHONY DAVIS and draft picks let alone Derrick Favors and Gordon Hayward.

    It is physically and completely impossible for you A. Have the assets to make that trade B. Convince the 76ers or lakers to do it

    0
  • #1063451
    AvatarAvatar
    SwatLakeCity
    Participant

     I think Exum is that star that you are looking for. Give this guy a chance. He got hurt before this season even began, and was out for the enitire season. This was the season the Jazz were hoping Exum could really show his stuff and be that star. So now next year would have to be that year  The Jazz have all the pieces, now they just need a closer. They can do that in this draft. And if they do, and make the playoffs, then Hayward will stay. Besides I think both him and Favors like playing in Utah.

    0
  • #1063574
    AvatarAvatar
    SwatLakeCity
    Participant

     I think Exum is that star that you are looking for. Give this guy a chance. He got hurt before this season even began, and was out for the enitire season. This was the season the Jazz were hoping Exum could really show his stuff and be that star. So now next year would have to be that year  The Jazz have all the pieces, now they just need a closer. They can do that in this draft. And if they do, and make the playoffs, then Hayward will stay. Besides I think both him and Favors like playing in Utah.

    0
  • #1063461
    AvatarAvatar
    Hype Machine

    Philly fans can have their moment in the sunshine. They been terrible for long enough to bask in the glory now. They gonna get an MVP candidate for real if they take Ben Simmons tho, especially if they can keep him 8 or so years. 

    But Jazz fans, dont sweat the top picks this year. They’re gone. Look at the list of MVP’s and All Stars over the last 20 years. There’s a few #1 picks in there, and there’s a few that had little to no hype coming into the draft. 

    Guys like Kobe, Steph Curry, Dirk Nowitzki, D-Wade etc….all delivered titles…all weren’t in contention for the #1 pick. Even guys like Steve Nash, KG, Chris Paul…..you don’t need the #1 pick to get an MVP. 

    Follow this simple rule: Draft well, trade well, create a culture players want to come & stay, hire good staff and keep improving.

    The Jazz is going to be a good team, like the Raptors, Hawks, Pacers of recent years. They’re not contending but you gotta be close to begin with before you’re even a chance. 

    Then someone like Exum, Hood or the #12 pick in the 2016 draft performs way beyond expectation and boom, you got a finals calibre team. 

     

     

     

     

     

    0
    • #1063527
      AvatarAvatar
      Hazel
      Participant

       Thanks for adding some sanity to the whole thing.  People don’t like to think about an organization being successfull they just want to think about getting the star.  Get the framwork and culture and develop stars. That is real sucess.  Once you do that, other stars start wanting to join.  

      Thank you New England, San Antonio, and St Louis (Cardinals) for showing us that.  

       

      0
    • #1063650
      AvatarAvatar
      Hazel
      Participant

       Thanks for adding some sanity to the whole thing.  People don’t like to think about an organization being successfull they just want to think about getting the star.  Get the framwork and culture and develop stars. That is real sucess.  Once you do that, other stars start wanting to join.  

      Thank you New England, San Antonio, and St Louis (Cardinals) for showing us that.  

       

      0
  • #1063584
    AvatarAvatar
    Hype Machine

    Philly fans can have their moment in the sunshine. They been terrible for long enough to bask in the glory now. They gonna get an MVP candidate for real if they take Ben Simmons tho, especially if they can keep him 8 or so years. 

    But Jazz fans, dont sweat the top picks this year. They’re gone. Look at the list of MVP’s and All Stars over the last 20 years. There’s a few #1 picks in there, and there’s a few that had little to no hype coming into the draft. 

    Guys like Kobe, Steph Curry, Dirk Nowitzki, D-Wade etc….all delivered titles…all weren’t in contention for the #1 pick. Even guys like Steve Nash, KG, Chris Paul…..you don’t need the #1 pick to get an MVP. 

    Follow this simple rule: Draft well, trade well, create a culture players want to come & stay, hire good staff and keep improving.

    The Jazz is going to be a good team, like the Raptors, Hawks, Pacers of recent years. They’re not contending but you gotta be close to begin with before you’re even a chance. 

    Then someone like Exum, Hood or the #12 pick in the 2016 draft performs way beyond expectation and boom, you got a finals calibre team. 

     

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #1063531
    AvatarAvatar
    NBAjunkie81
    Participant

     be Historically deep….. I agree w/ others that I’m happy for Phila fans they have suffered Badly since the day they traded for Andrew Bynum……… & we’re forgetting that the Sixers could possibly make the playoffs next year & STILL have 2 top 10 Lottery picks…….. they are Loaded for years to come w/ Okafor; Embbid & Simmons…….

    But I still LUV what Utah has going on……. Gobert, Exum & Hood are a really sweet group of Talent….. I think trading Gobert & / or Favors for a young Star is a Great idea but no way would I give away your future picks……

    I do Not believe Ingram will be the Star everyone thinks he will……. I think he will be a really good #2 or #3 scoring option……. but Ingram is Not a great shooter – he’s a Good shooter for a guy who is 6’9”……. & Ingram lacks the Explosiveness of Kevin Durant……… he is Really going to struggle w/ the Physical Nature of NBA defenders……. Yes he can shoot over them…….. but he’s Not Steph Curry – Ingram is a 35% – 3pt shooter – that’s Outstanding for a 6’9” man but overall it’s good but far from Great…….. & he just does Not have that lightning quick 1st step to create his own shot & that is HUGE……. b/c that means Ingram will be forced to work off Ball Screens & he will be great at that eventually but he’s never going to draw a Double team……………….

    So see what you can get for Hayward & Favors & load up for next years Draft & you might be able to grab a Franchise changing Wing to go w/ Gobert, Hood & Exum……. & then you’ll just have to be patient as the team grows…….

     

     

     

    0
  • #1063654
    AvatarAvatar
    NBAjunkie81
    Participant

     be Historically deep….. I agree w/ others that I’m happy for Phila fans they have suffered Badly since the day they traded for Andrew Bynum……… & we’re forgetting that the Sixers could possibly make the playoffs next year & STILL have 2 top 10 Lottery picks…….. they are Loaded for years to come w/ Okafor; Embbid & Simmons…….

    But I still LUV what Utah has going on……. Gobert, Exum & Hood are a really sweet group of Talent….. I think trading Gobert & / or Favors for a young Star is a Great idea but no way would I give away your future picks……

    I do Not believe Ingram will be the Star everyone thinks he will……. I think he will be a really good #2 or #3 scoring option……. but Ingram is Not a great shooter – he’s a Good shooter for a guy who is 6’9”……. & Ingram lacks the Explosiveness of Kevin Durant……… he is Really going to struggle w/ the Physical Nature of NBA defenders……. Yes he can shoot over them…….. but he’s Not Steph Curry – Ingram is a 35% – 3pt shooter – that’s Outstanding for a 6’9” man but overall it’s good but far from Great…….. & he just does Not have that lightning quick 1st step to create his own shot & that is HUGE……. b/c that means Ingram will be forced to work off Ball Screens & he will be great at that eventually but he’s never going to draw a Double team……………….

    So see what you can get for Hayward & Favors & load up for next years Draft & you might be able to grab a Franchise changing Wing to go w/ Gobert, Hood & Exum……. & then you’ll just have to be patient as the team grows…….

     

     

     

    0
  • #1063533
    AvatarAvatar
    Dazzling Dunks and Basketball Bloopers
    Participant

     Although favors/ Hayward would be more than adequate compensation for ingram I would still pass if I’m the Lakers. While both are very good players, neither will be enough to put them over the top anytime soon and both have pretty much maxed out their potential at this point. Plus their contracts will eat into the Lakers cap space and they will have to worry about resigning them in a few years. I’d rather have a young player in ingram who I believe has superstar potential on a rookie deal with the chance to lock him up long-term. Making that trade would reek of desperation to put a decent product on the floor right now while sacrificing the future. BTW, I don’t make that trade if I’m Utah either.

    As a Lakers fan, I’ve already said I have no interest in acquiring cousins if it will involve trading Russell or the no. 2 pick, which it almost surely will.

     

    0
  • #1063656
    AvatarAvatar
    Dazzling Dunks and Basketball Bloopers
    Participant

     Although favors/ Hayward would be more than adequate compensation for ingram I would still pass if I’m the Lakers. While both are very good players, neither will be enough to put them over the top anytime soon and both have pretty much maxed out their potential at this point. Plus their contracts will eat into the Lakers cap space and they will have to worry about resigning them in a few years. I’d rather have a young player in ingram who I believe has superstar potential on a rookie deal with the chance to lock him up long-term. Making that trade would reek of desperation to put a decent product on the floor right now while sacrificing the future. BTW, I don’t make that trade if I’m Utah either.

    As a Lakers fan, I’ve already said I have no interest in acquiring cousins if it will involve trading Russell or the no. 2 pick, which it almost surely will.

     

    0
  • #1063539
    AvatarAvatar
    Magic Jordan
    Participant

    Someone asks the question what are the Jazz supposed to build around in regards to trading Hayward and Favors. I then ask you, if this trade were to happen… what are the Lakers supposed to build around? I never understand the argument of “Well my team is in this state, what are they supposed to do to get better or take the next step”. The answer is usually, if the players aren’t good enough to get your team where you want to go. They most likely aren’t going to be good enough to get a worse team where they want to go either.

    It would take a serious offer for me to consider moving Ingram or Simmons and I don’t think that Hayward and Favors do it. That is not to knock them as players as they would instantly become the best and 2nd best players on the Lakers. But they don’t move the needle enough in the right direction to pass on potential franchise players in Ingram and Simmons.
    Lakers should just stand pat and be patient. No thanks on Cousins, no thanks on Butler. I’d take George in a heart beat but that isn’t happening so might as well take the 18 year old kid who in a few years could be as good as Paul George is.

    I don’t understand the rush from the Lakers perspective. Assume the absolute best case scenario for the Lakers. Some f’n miracle happens, and they somehow land Cousins, Butler and George this off season (how is irrelevant because I am just making a point). Those are the 3 most talked about trade targets for the summer. If they were to land all 3 where does that put them in the West? 5th? 6th? Not a championship contender and probably can’t get past Dubs, Thunder, Spurs or Clips. They may be even with the Clips depending on cast but definitely not getting past the other 3.
    That is an unrealistic scenario above and it would only put them in the middle of the Western conference playoff race. At least in my opinion. I am sure you could argue for or against a few spots but you can’t argue that they would coast to the finals or anything.

    The point is there aren’t many moves that you can make that will vault you past teams that currently have the best players in the game. Even unrealistic ones.

    Be patient. Improve each year for the next 3 or 4 years and all of these guys, Durant, Lebron, Curry, Westbrook will be coming out of their primes and on the downslope of their careers.

    I know that’s hard to pitch to an incredibly impatient fan base but it’s realistic and practical. And the most likely outcome either way.
    The notion that the Lakers will be back in the Western Conference finals this upcoming year, or the year after is just complete ignorance.

    Be patient, draft, grow.

    0
    • #1063784
      AvatarAvatar
      Dazzling Dunks and Basketball Bloopers
      Participant

       I agree completely. There are only about 5-6 players in the league who I would consider trading the number 2 pick for right now and I doubt any of them are available. 

      0
    • #1063661
      AvatarAvatar
      Dazzling Dunks and Basketball Bloopers
      Participant

       I agree completely. There are only about 5-6 players in the league who I would consider trading the number 2 pick for right now and I doubt any of them are available. 

      0
  • #1063662
    AvatarAvatar
    Magic Jordan
    Participant

    Someone asks the question what are the Jazz supposed to build around in regards to trading Hayward and Favors. I then ask you, if this trade were to happen… what are the Lakers supposed to build around? I never understand the argument of “Well my team is in this state, what are they supposed to do to get better or take the next step”. The answer is usually, if the players aren’t good enough to get your team where you want to go. They most likely aren’t going to be good enough to get a worse team where they want to go either.

    It would take a serious offer for me to consider moving Ingram or Simmons and I don’t think that Hayward and Favors do it. That is not to knock them as players as they would instantly become the best and 2nd best players on the Lakers. But they don’t move the needle enough in the right direction to pass on potential franchise players in Ingram and Simmons.
    Lakers should just stand pat and be patient. No thanks on Cousins, no thanks on Butler. I’d take George in a heart beat but that isn’t happening so might as well take the 18 year old kid who in a few years could be as good as Paul George is.

    I don’t understand the rush from the Lakers perspective. Assume the absolute best case scenario for the Lakers. Some f’n miracle happens, and they somehow land Cousins, Butler and George this off season (how is irrelevant because I am just making a point). Those are the 3 most talked about trade targets for the summer. If they were to land all 3 where does that put them in the West? 5th? 6th? Not a championship contender and probably can’t get past Dubs, Thunder, Spurs or Clips. They may be even with the Clips depending on cast but definitely not getting past the other 3.
    That is an unrealistic scenario above and it would only put them in the middle of the Western conference playoff race. At least in my opinion. I am sure you could argue for or against a few spots but you can’t argue that they would coast to the finals or anything.

    The point is there aren’t many moves that you can make that will vault you past teams that currently have the best players in the game. Even unrealistic ones.

    Be patient. Improve each year for the next 3 or 4 years and all of these guys, Durant, Lebron, Curry, Westbrook will be coming out of their primes and on the downslope of their careers.

    I know that’s hard to pitch to an incredibly impatient fan base but it’s realistic and practical. And the most likely outcome either way.
    The notion that the Lakers will be back in the Western Conference finals this upcoming year, or the year after is just complete ignorance.

    Be patient, draft, grow.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login