This topic contains 80 replies, has 16 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar I am an idiot 10 years, 7 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #61832
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

     There’s a problem in Boston and I’m not sure if its going unnoticed or not but its definitely going to effect their win/loss margin. Danny Ainge has stockpiled a ton of talent/picks in hopes of landing a big target in the trade market yet keeps coming up short. They have rotation players that can play interchangeable positions sometime 2 or 3 deep each position and not enough playing time to maintain order and instill enough confidence in the players to maximize their potential. 

    Out of the 4 players getting 29-mpg or more none of them shoot higher than 40% (Smart, Bradley, Crowder, Thomas) and they have an extreme log jam at PF/C. Amir Johnson, Sully, Lee, and Olynyk are all capable of playing 25-mpg but are all averaging 21-mpg to 16-mpg inconsistently and while Johnson and Lee maybe able to produce efficiently with a lack of minutes Olynyk and Sullinger are guys who need to find a grove throughout the game and not just get quick yanks. They are also the guys with more upside and longterm value. Zeller is another guy who has proven to be a stud when given minutes and he is averaging 8-mpg.

    Then you have guys like Rozier, Hunter, Mickey and Young and I believe Rozier and Mickey have proven they are NBA quality players. With all these guys getting limited minutes the team has to understand the NBA is a business. These guys want an opportunity to prove their value and overall $$Dollar Worth$$. If they aren’t given the opportunity collectively there will be big time morale issues leading to less productivity. Its human nature.

    So what has to happen is some sort of trade to bring someone over to Boston that can add a higher level of talent then they already have and get rid of some of their depth creating more playing opportunity.

    Who should they target realistically. I don’t think that Gasol, or Cousins is realistically. Is K-Mart a good add? What do they do?

     

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #1023618
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

     T-Rex I’m throwing you a bone here.

    0
  • #1023481
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

     T-Rex I’m throwing you a bone here.

    0
  • #1023493
    AvatarAvatar
    T Rex

     Weak troll.

    Somehow I think the Celtics are going to be okay in the long run no matter what happens this year. And we’re still contenders this year because we can make a big trade at any time, or just sit tight and rule the east next year.

    Now that Stevens knows to play Olynyk, and knows that Olynyk’s defense is an asset even when his shot is off, the team will be fine, ready to pounce on the next Billy King, or the next time Mark Cuban is in the Daily Show green room and wants to make a big trade to show off for the other celebrities.

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #1023630
    AvatarAvatar
    T Rex

     Weak troll.

    Somehow I think the Celtics are going to be okay in the long run no matter what happens this year. And we’re still contenders this year because we can make a big trade at any time, or just sit tight and rule the east next year.

    Now that Stevens knows to play Olynyk, and knows that Olynyk’s defense is an asset even when his shot is off, the team will be fine, ready to pounce on the next Billy King, or the next time Mark Cuban is in the Daily Show green room and wants to make a big trade to show off for the other celebrities.

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #1023513
    AvatarAvatar
    esperanzafleet69
    Participant

     they have brooklyns picks thru 2018, along with dallas’ and minnesotas in 2016. they should stand pat like philly did and let brooklyn continue to suck, soaking up some talent that way. theyve got some decent role players in place, now they just need a couple stars.

    0
  • #1023650
    AvatarAvatar
    esperanzafleet69
    Participant

     they have brooklyns picks thru 2018, along with dallas’ and minnesotas in 2016. they should stand pat like philly did and let brooklyn continue to suck, soaking up some talent that way. theyve got some decent role players in place, now they just need a couple stars.

    0
  • #1023521
    AvatarAvatar
    BostonCs Fan
    Participant

    I’m not seeing an issue with my Celtics. That front court logjam comment is an overstatement. Lee is having a horrendous start only 5 games in and it’s evident he’s found a new home coming off the bench where he’s more productive. Zeller is another player who’s having a poor start. Talk about the epitome of soft, Zeller has been getting abused down on the block and the best aspect of his game which is his offense hasnt been going for him. You think Mickey, Rozier, Hunter, Young all off who are rookies and sophomores somehow not getting minutes would bring moral issues to the team. These players would get little to no minutes on any other team as well. There all prospects. 

    0
    • #1023525
      AvatarAvatar
      T Rex

       You’re wrong about those guys not getting minutes on other teams.

      So wrong.

      Mickey should already be getting more minutes over Lee and now Amir since he is dealing with a bad ankle. Amir has been pretty bad last couple games. And Mickey is a much better defender than Sully against guys like Aldridge and Jordan Hill, tall mobile guys that eat Sully alive because he’s too short, can’t jump, and can’t move in space.

      And Rozier should already be eating into Bradley’s minutes a lot more. I really hope Bradley goes to the bench tomorrow and Smart and IT start. That’s one way to get Rozier into the thick of the rotation as backup pg.

      Hunter should be getting minutes in there as well, or at least he’s good enough to.

      This year’s rookie class is really playing well in general. Something like 18 rookies with a positive +/-, and a lot more just below that. It’s not like Rozier, Hunter, and Mickey are 19 year olds. These guys are highly experienced, smart, and talented.

      Jerian Grant, a pg picked after Rozier, has been making a big impact for the Knicks as backup point guard since day one, though without flashy stats. Rozier is just what this team needs, and one of Rozier or IT needs to be on the court at all times, like we saw these last two games.

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      0
      • #1023561
        AvatarAvatar
        Snowta
        Participant

         Highly experienced rookies… that’s an oxymoron. I don’t think the fact that rookies throughout the league are playing well really can be used as an argument that the C’s rookies should be playing and would do well if they did play. Jerian Grant is a better player than Rozier right now. The C’s vets give them the best chance to win.

        0
        • #1023569
          AvatarAvatar
          T Rex

           They’re not James Young one-and-done rookies. They’re 21-22 year old men with NBA ready skills and bbiqs. They’ll get their chance with injuries and/or lackluster play, and you’ll see.

          And then you’ll forget you ever thought they weren’t ready.

           

          0
        • #1023706
          AvatarAvatar
          T Rex

           They’re not James Young one-and-done rookies. They’re 21-22 year old men with NBA ready skills and bbiqs. They’ll get their chance with injuries and/or lackluster play, and you’ll see.

          And then you’ll forget you ever thought they weren’t ready.

           

          0
      • #1023698
        AvatarAvatar
        Snowta
        Participant

         Highly experienced rookies… that’s an oxymoron. I don’t think the fact that rookies throughout the league are playing well really can be used as an argument that the C’s rookies should be playing and would do well if they did play. Jerian Grant is a better player than Rozier right now. The C’s vets give them the best chance to win.

        0
    • #1023662
      AvatarAvatar
      T Rex

       You’re wrong about those guys not getting minutes on other teams.

      So wrong.

      Mickey should already be getting more minutes over Lee and now Amir since he is dealing with a bad ankle. Amir has been pretty bad last couple games. And Mickey is a much better defender than Sully against guys like Aldridge and Jordan Hill, tall mobile guys that eat Sully alive because he’s too short, can’t jump, and can’t move in space.

      And Rozier should already be eating into Bradley’s minutes a lot more. I really hope Bradley goes to the bench tomorrow and Smart and IT start. That’s one way to get Rozier into the thick of the rotation as backup pg.

      Hunter should be getting minutes in there as well, or at least he’s good enough to.

      This year’s rookie class is really playing well in general. Something like 18 rookies with a positive +/-, and a lot more just below that. It’s not like Rozier, Hunter, and Mickey are 19 year olds. These guys are highly experienced, smart, and talented.

      Jerian Grant, a pg picked after Rozier, has been making a big impact for the Knicks as backup point guard since day one, though without flashy stats. Rozier is just what this team needs, and one of Rozier or IT needs to be on the court at all times, like we saw these last two games.

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      0
  • #1023658
    AvatarAvatar
    BostonCs Fan
    Participant

    I’m not seeing an issue with my Celtics. That front court logjam comment is an overstatement. Lee is having a horrendous start only 5 games in and it’s evident he’s found a new home coming off the bench where he’s more productive. Zeller is another player who’s having a poor start. Talk about the epitome of soft, Zeller has been getting abused down on the block and the best aspect of his game which is his offense hasnt been going for him. You think Mickey, Rozier, Hunter, Young all off who are rookies and sophomores somehow not getting minutes would bring moral issues to the team. These players would get little to no minutes on any other team as well. There all prospects. 

    0
  • #1023523
    AvatarAvatar
    trelos6
    Participant

    I see the main C’s as a group of 3 player rotations.

    Guard rotations: Smart, Bradley, Thomas

    Big rotations: Sully, Johnson, Olynyk

    SF: Crowder, Turner

    Rookie Scrubs/garbage time: Rozier, Hunter, Young, Mickey.

    Out of rotation unless injuries: Lee, Zeller, Jerebko

     

    Injuries can and will occur.  Teams need depth.  C’s are placed well to handle injuries over a 82 game season.

     

    0
  • #1023660
    AvatarAvatar
    trelos6
    Participant

    I see the main C’s as a group of 3 player rotations.

    Guard rotations: Smart, Bradley, Thomas

    Big rotations: Sully, Johnson, Olynyk

    SF: Crowder, Turner

    Rookie Scrubs/garbage time: Rozier, Hunter, Young, Mickey.

    Out of rotation unless injuries: Lee, Zeller, Jerebko

     

    Injuries can and will occur.  Teams need depth.  C’s are placed well to handle injuries over a 82 game season.

     

    0
  • #1023553
    AvatarAvatar
    Meditated States
    Participant

     Olynyk must shoot a lot more. KO and IT should lead this team in shots everynight, if not they are not feeding the right scorers the rock. Turner and IT need to handle the ball the most for success and Rozier add another pnetrator or a guy who can speed up the game. Terry should see more minutes if Smart and Bradley do not start shooting better soon. Unless Bradley and Smart are hot they should really never shoot more than Olynyk. Law of averages says KO will knock dowm more than them two dudes with the same amount of shots. 

    0
  • #1023690
    AvatarAvatar
    Meditated States
    Participant

     Olynyk must shoot a lot more. KO and IT should lead this team in shots everynight, if not they are not feeding the right scorers the rock. Turner and IT need to handle the ball the most for success and Rozier add another pnetrator or a guy who can speed up the game. Terry should see more minutes if Smart and Bradley do not start shooting better soon. Unless Bradley and Smart are hot they should really never shoot more than Olynyk. Law of averages says KO will knock dowm more than them two dudes with the same amount of shots. 

    0
  • #1023571
    AvatarAvatar
    I am an idiot
    Participant

    First off, for full disclosure, I am a Celtics fan. As we all know, this is a young team with a lot of unproven talent with no consensus All-Star in the making. Based on their top 8 players, they are a .500 team. Which in the East should get them to the playoffs.

    I think that their depth past the top-8 is arguably the best in the league. This will allow them to steal a few games during the year when injuries, road trips and back-to-back games drag down the competition (which hasn’t happened yet). We don’t need the rookies to play over their head to end up with 45 – 48 wins. Which will still leave us with a tough first round opponent and an early exit (since depth isn’t as important in the playoffs).

    Two things could change that for the better.

    1) Younger players can have hidden upside (and older players hidden downside). If an Olynyk, Smart or Sullinger really steps up their game, the team could improve substantially. Everyone talks about how great the Spurs have been at drafting top players higher in the draft. Maybe it is not the drafting, maybe it is how Pop develops them after they are on the team. My hope is that Stevens is the new Pop. Maybe T-Rex will be proved right about our rookies, but I doubt it will happen in their first year.

    2) This echos OhCanada. I don’t know what is going to happen, but Ainge will be in the discussion for every possible trade. There is not room for all these players and draft picks. In three years we’d have enough guys to field two teams if everyone stayed on board. I think there is a very small chance that this roster sees the end of the year. If it does, it won’t last past draft night. 

    I don’t know who is going to get time or who is going to be traded. There are way too many variables to call it. My guess is that Bradley and Lee will see less time as they are older players and known commodities. There is no upside there. One (or more) of the younger players is going to push them aside. 

    Thomas and Johnson will see as much time as their bodies allow (I think they are the two most polished players on the team).

    There is no one on this team nor is there a future draft pick that Ainge is afraid of trading. If the right player comes available, he will move (look at the offer of six picks on draft night in an attempt to bag Winslow). Very few GM’s have been better at finding and acquiring journeyman talent than Ainge. However, he has yet to prove that he can land a big fish without a former teammate at the other end of the phone.

     

     

     

     

     

     

      

    0
    • #1023830
      AvatarAvatar
      DrivingDownTheStreetinmy64

       +1 for that spot on username!!!!

      0
    • #1023693
      AvatarAvatar
      DrivingDownTheStreetinmy64

       +1 for that spot on username!!!!

      0
  • #1023708
    AvatarAvatar
    I am an idiot
    Participant

    First off, for full disclosure, I am a Celtics fan. As we all know, this is a young team with a lot of unproven talent with no consensus All-Star in the making. Based on their top 8 players, they are a .500 team. Which in the East should get them to the playoffs.

    I think that their depth past the top-8 is arguably the best in the league. This will allow them to steal a few games during the year when injuries, road trips and back-to-back games drag down the competition (which hasn’t happened yet). We don’t need the rookies to play over their head to end up with 45 – 48 wins. Which will still leave us with a tough first round opponent and an early exit (since depth isn’t as important in the playoffs).

    Two things could change that for the better.

    1) Younger players can have hidden upside (and older players hidden downside). If an Olynyk, Smart or Sullinger really steps up their game, the team could improve substantially. Everyone talks about how great the Spurs have been at drafting top players higher in the draft. Maybe it is not the drafting, maybe it is how Pop develops them after they are on the team. My hope is that Stevens is the new Pop. Maybe T-Rex will be proved right about our rookies, but I doubt it will happen in their first year.

    2) This echos OhCanada. I don’t know what is going to happen, but Ainge will be in the discussion for every possible trade. There is not room for all these players and draft picks. In three years we’d have enough guys to field two teams if everyone stayed on board. I think there is a very small chance that this roster sees the end of the year. If it does, it won’t last past draft night. 

    I don’t know who is going to get time or who is going to be traded. There are way too many variables to call it. My guess is that Bradley and Lee will see less time as they are older players and known commodities. There is no upside there. One (or more) of the younger players is going to push them aside. 

    Thomas and Johnson will see as much time as their bodies allow (I think they are the two most polished players on the team).

    There is no one on this team nor is there a future draft pick that Ainge is afraid of trading. If the right player comes available, he will move (look at the offer of six picks on draft night in an attempt to bag Winslow). Very few GM’s have been better at finding and acquiring journeyman talent than Ainge. However, he has yet to prove that he can land a big fish without a former teammate at the other end of the phone.

     

     

     

     

     

     

      

    0
  • #1023577
    AvatarAvatar
    markfitz14
    Participant

     Scoring will continue to be an issue becuase they only have one player IT who is above average in scoring. Lee had a chance to show what he had. He just didn’t do much. He only has the expiring contract trade value. Sully and KO are better and will take over his minutes from now on. Lee should just become a bench guy to get Sully and KO more time. They absolutely need the minutes to get in a groove and take a leap in their games. 

    Rozier and Hunter need to work on their game in practice and when an opportunity arises take it if they can prrove they have the skill. It will be a waiting game for them. 

    If I was GM I trade Bradley to anyone who will give me a return of a pick. Then give Rozier and Hunter some more minutes. This is a developing team. They need to develop the damn players. I understand trying to make the playoffs but thats where they would stop anyway. Prbly get swept or lose 4-2. They need to find out if Hunter and Rozier can contribute and will need more minutes next year. And the same for Sully and KO.

     

     

     

    0
  • #1023714
    AvatarAvatar
    markfitz14
    Participant

     Scoring will continue to be an issue becuase they only have one player IT who is above average in scoring. Lee had a chance to show what he had. He just didn’t do much. He only has the expiring contract trade value. Sully and KO are better and will take over his minutes from now on. Lee should just become a bench guy to get Sully and KO more time. They absolutely need the minutes to get in a groove and take a leap in their games. 

    Rozier and Hunter need to work on their game in practice and when an opportunity arises take it if they can prrove they have the skill. It will be a waiting game for them. 

    If I was GM I trade Bradley to anyone who will give me a return of a pick. Then give Rozier and Hunter some more minutes. This is a developing team. They need to develop the damn players. I understand trying to make the playoffs but thats where they would stop anyway. Prbly get swept or lose 4-2. They need to find out if Hunter and Rozier can contribute and will need more minutes next year. And the same for Sully and KO.

     

     

     

    0
  • #1023583
    AvatarAvatar
    Joacoddr
    Participant

    What the Celtics really need it’s a true star (The first name that comes to mind is Cousins) but as a Celtics fan i think that Ainge’s hope is to land Ben Simmons with the Nets pick. This can be a playoff year for Boston but until they decide what to do with all their logjams i don’t think they could be considered contenders even with Brad Stevens as a coach

    0
    • #1023589
      AvatarAvatar
      markfitz14
      Participant

       I want him on the Celtics so bad. Just dont think SAC will ever do it. They want to try to build around him as they open a new stadium. 

      0
    • #1023726
      AvatarAvatar
      markfitz14
      Participant

       I want him on the Celtics so bad. Just dont think SAC will ever do it. They want to try to build around him as they open a new stadium. 

      0
  • #1023720
    AvatarAvatar
    Joacoddr
    Participant

    What the Celtics really need it’s a true star (The first name that comes to mind is Cousins) but as a Celtics fan i think that Ainge’s hope is to land Ben Simmons with the Nets pick. This can be a playoff year for Boston but until they decide what to do with all their logjams i don’t think they could be considered contenders even with Brad Stevens as a coach

    0
  • #1023585
    AvatarAvatar
    Andrew1984
    Participant

     I love Brad Stevens and Danny Ainge, but I am disappointed in both of them. I really thought that by the time they were a few weeks into their third season of the rebuild, they’d be a lot farther along the path to becoming a legitimate contender in the east.

    We know that Cleveland, Chicago, Washington, and Toronto (who knows about Atlanta) are going to be in the thick of things, regardless of how the seeds play out. But I see so much more talent in Orlando and even New York than I do in Boston. Even Indiana has more to be optimistic about because they have a bonafide superstar who is relatively young. Detroit finally seems to have their act together and appears ready to play post-season basketball. 

    Boston has failed to develop an identity. Nobody knows what they are. Nobody knows who the players are that will get them to where they want to be (unlike Minnesota, where it’s obviously going to be the Wiggins-KAT show for the next five years at least). They’re just confusing. No individual players are emerging as guaranteed future All-Stars. Nobody knows if they’re a ball-movement team like the Spurs, a perimeter-shooting team like Golden State, a grind-it-out defensive team like Chicago, an iso-for-your-two-absolute-monsters team like OKC, a spacing-concept team like Cleveland, etc. 

    The whole rebuild seems like it had no plan whatsoever. There’s nothing methodical or deliberate; they’re just throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. 

    And T. Rex, before you blow a gasket: I actually find your commentary to be occasionally insightful and analytical; admittedly, you do occasionally bring out stats or observations that were below the surface. But the word denial comes to mind. You seem to vigorously defend your hometown club, regardless of the truth. I am all for loyalty and optimism, but don’t you want to hold them accountable? Don’t you want to demand excellence from a franchise that has been the absolute benchmark of quality and class since the early ’60s? I mean, honestly, doesn’t what you’re seeing BOTHER you?!

     

     

     

     

     

    0
    • #1023591
      AvatarAvatar
      T Rex

       I can already tell you were a pro-tanker last year, thought the Celtics would stink without Rondo, and had mixed feelings at best about the playoff run.

      So transparent.

      So pathetic.

      You really thought the Celtics would be legit contenders by the third year of the re-build?

      You’re disappointed that the Celtics only went 24-12 to end last season?

      Let me guess, a late first rounder was too much to pay for 3.5 season of Isaiah Thomas at 7 million a year.

      You were a pro-tanker, and convinced yourself that going 24-12 last year was a short term gain but a long term loss.

      So pathetic. So bitter.

      So transparent.

      No, still bitter, you close your eyes and pretend you can’t see the upside of a top 5 pick from the Nets next year, nor up to 2-3 other lottery picks this coming draft.

      So bitter, you pretend that Smart, Olynyk, IT4, Rozier, Hunter, Mickey, and Young have no upside.

      It’s that stupid thinking that made you think there was no way in hell Smart would be better than Rondo after Rondo got traded away.

      Just a bitter, miserable tanker who cares more about being right than he does about the Celtics.

      Probably a Paul Pierce worshipper who wanted to tank so you could worship D’Angelo Russell for the next ten years.

      With no heroes to worship, the Celtics are dead to you.

      Go root for the Cavs.

       

       

       

       

       

      0
      • #1023593
        AvatarAvatar
        Andrew1984
        Participant

         I never said a word about tanking! 

         

        0
        • #1023597
          AvatarAvatar
          T Rex

           You didn’t have to.

          You also didn’t deny that you were pro-tank last year.

           

           

          0
          • #1023601
            AvatarAvatar
            Andrew1984
            Participant

             With regard to tanking, I am for teams having the liberty to do if they want and I am against NBA rules changes designed to prevent it, but as far whether a particular team should do it, it’s a case-by-case question. I never gave one second of thought to whether or not I felt the Celtics should tank. 

            0
            • #1023750
              AvatarAvatar
              T Rex

               You still haven’t denied being a tanker last year. 

              You only admit you "haven’t given any thought" about whether you were a tanker or not.

              Because you don’t want to admit you were a tanker, so you pretend not to remember, or even care to remember.

              So transparent.

              You thought the team was going to be terrible without Rondo, and then you pretend now like you’re really disappointed that the Celtics aren’t closer to being legit contenders.

              I stand by my original post and the easy psychological diagnosis.

               

               

              0
            • #1023613
              AvatarAvatar
              T Rex

               You still haven’t denied being a tanker last year. 

              You only admit you "haven’t given any thought" about whether you were a tanker or not.

              Because you don’t want to admit you were a tanker, so you pretend not to remember, or even care to remember.

              So transparent.

              You thought the team was going to be terrible without Rondo, and then you pretend now like you’re really disappointed that the Celtics aren’t closer to being legit contenders.

              I stand by my original post and the easy psychological diagnosis.

               

               

              0
          • #1023738
            AvatarAvatar
            Andrew1984
            Participant

             With regard to tanking, I am for teams having the liberty to do if they want and I am against NBA rules changes designed to prevent it, but as far whether a particular team should do it, it’s a case-by-case question. I never gave one second of thought to whether or not I felt the Celtics should tank. 

            0
        • #1023734
          AvatarAvatar
          T Rex

           You didn’t have to.

          You also didn’t deny that you were pro-tank last year.

           

           

          0
      • #1023730
        AvatarAvatar
        Andrew1984
        Participant

         I never said a word about tanking! 

         

        0
      • #1023746
        AvatarAvatar
        markfitz14
        Participant

         You are right though I don’t want to root for a team to lose. And that trade for IT has been a steal. I just want some of these picks and players to be dealt for elite players. Seems like no teams want to trade top picks anymore though. And there aren’t any teams looking to deal All stars. Kinda stuck with developing the current guys. But at least play them then.

        0
      • #1023609
        AvatarAvatar
        markfitz14
        Participant

         You are right though I don’t want to root for a team to lose. And that trade for IT has been a steal. I just want some of these picks and players to be dealt for elite players. Seems like no teams want to trade top picks anymore though. And there aren’t any teams looking to deal All stars. Kinda stuck with developing the current guys. But at least play them then.

        0
    • #1023728
      AvatarAvatar
      T Rex

       I can already tell you were a pro-tanker last year, thought the Celtics would stink without Rondo, and had mixed feelings at best about the playoff run.

      So transparent.

      So pathetic.

      You really thought the Celtics would be legit contenders by the third year of the re-build?

      You’re disappointed that the Celtics only went 24-12 to end last season?

      Let me guess, a late first rounder was too much to pay for 3.5 season of Isaiah Thomas at 7 million a year.

      You were a pro-tanker, and convinced yourself that going 24-12 last year was a short term gain but a long term loss.

      So pathetic. So bitter.

      So transparent.

      No, still bitter, you close your eyes and pretend you can’t see the upside of a top 5 pick from the Nets next year, nor up to 2-3 other lottery picks this coming draft.

      So bitter, you pretend that Smart, Olynyk, IT4, Rozier, Hunter, Mickey, and Young have no upside.

      It’s that stupid thinking that made you think there was no way in hell Smart would be better than Rondo after Rondo got traded away.

      Just a bitter, miserable tanker who cares more about being right than he does about the Celtics.

      Probably a Paul Pierce worshipper who wanted to tank so you could worship D’Angelo Russell for the next ten years.

      With no heroes to worship, the Celtics are dead to you.

      Go root for the Cavs.

       

       

       

       

       

      0
    • #1023599
      AvatarAvatar
      markfitz14
      Participant

       It all stems from last year. They picked up IT and tried to make a push for the playoffs blowing a chance at a top pick. This is what happens when teams don’t blow it up and try to get a top pick. They end up trying to develop Sully and KO. Now the team is stuck in the middle unless that Nets picks ends up being Gold(top3). 

      I remember Turner and Green hitting game winners in years past. Now those guys prbly won’t even be part of the future anyway. Sometimes you have to lose for the greater good. It takes several studs or all stars to compete against Cleveland and Lebron. 

      I for one am fed up with middle of the road talent. I wouldn’t even mind sucking if I had a top talent player like KAT to watch on the Celtics. It gives hope to think oh this is our guy this is our guy to build around.

       

       

      0
    • #1023736
      AvatarAvatar
      markfitz14
      Participant

       It all stems from last year. They picked up IT and tried to make a push for the playoffs blowing a chance at a top pick. This is what happens when teams don’t blow it up and try to get a top pick. They end up trying to develop Sully and KO. Now the team is stuck in the middle unless that Nets picks ends up being Gold(top3). 

      I remember Turner and Green hitting game winners in years past. Now those guys prbly won’t even be part of the future anyway. Sometimes you have to lose for the greater good. It takes several studs or all stars to compete against Cleveland and Lebron. 

      I for one am fed up with middle of the road talent. I wouldn’t even mind sucking if I had a top talent player like KAT to watch on the Celtics. It gives hope to think oh this is our guy this is our guy to build around.

       

       

      0
  • #1023722
    AvatarAvatar
    Andrew1984
    Participant

     I love Brad Stevens and Danny Ainge, but I am disappointed in both of them. I really thought that by the time they were a few weeks into their third season of the rebuild, they’d be a lot farther along the path to becoming a legitimate contender in the east.

    We know that Cleveland, Chicago, Washington, and Toronto (who knows about Atlanta) are going to be in the thick of things, regardless of how the seeds play out. But I see so much more talent in Orlando and even New York than I do in Boston. Even Indiana has more to be optimistic about because they have a bonafide superstar who is relatively young. Detroit finally seems to have their act together and appears ready to play post-season basketball. 

    Boston has failed to develop an identity. Nobody knows what they are. Nobody knows who the players are that will get them to where they want to be (unlike Minnesota, where it’s obviously going to be the Wiggins-KAT show for the next five years at least). They’re just confusing. No individual players are emerging as guaranteed future All-Stars. Nobody knows if they’re a ball-movement team like the Spurs, a perimeter-shooting team like Golden State, a grind-it-out defensive team like Chicago, an iso-for-your-two-absolute-monsters team like OKC, a spacing-concept team like Cleveland, etc. 

    The whole rebuild seems like it had no plan whatsoever. There’s nothing methodical or deliberate; they’re just throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. 

    And T. Rex, before you blow a gasket: I actually find your commentary to be occasionally insightful and analytical; admittedly, you do occasionally bring out stats or observations that were below the surface. But the word denial comes to mind. You seem to vigorously defend your hometown club, regardless of the truth. I am all for loyalty and optimism, but don’t you want to hold them accountable? Don’t you want to demand excellence from a franchise that has been the absolute benchmark of quality and class since the early ’60s? I mean, honestly, doesn’t what you’re seeing BOTHER you?!

     

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #1023587
    AvatarAvatar
    markfitz14
    Participant

     I wonder if New Orleans would trade their 2016 first rounder for Veteran help? Trade them some combo of Bradley, Turner, Lee, Jerebko or who ever they want. And NO tries to make a push for the playoffs. Not that we need more picks. But they got the Brow so they should make a push for the playoffs. And why not stock pile more picks if you can dump guys you don’t need on the roster. I would even give Crowder if they were interested in him. He just dosen’t do much for me.

    0
  • #1023724
    AvatarAvatar
    markfitz14
    Participant

     I wonder if New Orleans would trade their 2016 first rounder for Veteran help? Trade them some combo of Bradley, Turner, Lee, Jerebko or who ever they want. And NO tries to make a push for the playoffs. Not that we need more picks. But they got the Brow so they should make a push for the playoffs. And why not stock pile more picks if you can dump guys you don’t need on the roster. I would even give Crowder if they were interested in him. He just dosen’t do much for me.

    0
  • #1023744
    AvatarAvatar
    ZachAttack
    Participant

    The Celtics HAVE to get rid of players. I mean, they have 4 first round picks if I remember right, next year. They have too many pieces and they are dropping in trade value daily. As much as T Rex would hate this, they need to get rid of Olynyk, Bradley, Turner, Rozier, Hunter, any of those guys and get some space on their roster. The only guy that is a sure keeper for that team is Thomas. He’s the only one that should have a secure spot on that roster. If they don’t get rid of players, that number one pick will go to waste.

    0
  • #1023607
    AvatarAvatar
    ZachAttack
    Participant

    The Celtics HAVE to get rid of players. I mean, they have 4 first round picks if I remember right, next year. They have too many pieces and they are dropping in trade value daily. As much as T Rex would hate this, they need to get rid of Olynyk, Bradley, Turner, Rozier, Hunter, any of those guys and get some space on their roster. The only guy that is a sure keeper for that team is Thomas. He’s the only one that should have a secure spot on that roster. If they don’t get rid of players, that number one pick will go to waste.

    0
    • #1023752
      AvatarAvatar
      T Rex

       Are you trying to fail 8th grade again?

       

       

      0
    • #1023615
      AvatarAvatar
      T Rex

       Are you trying to fail 8th grade again?

       

       

      0
      • #1023764
        AvatarAvatar
        ZachAttack
        Participant

         Explain yourself… What’s wrong with my idea?

        0
      • #1023627
        AvatarAvatar
        ZachAttack
        Participant

         Explain yourself… What’s wrong with my idea?

        0
        • #1023768
          AvatarAvatar
          T Rex

           the celtics need to rush to cut players right now, because the draft is 7 months away?

          You didn’t even think that 4 players are on expiring contracts, 5 if you include the Amir team option.

          And their rookies of all people are the guys they need to cut, two weeks into their rookie season?

          I’m now dumber for having taken the time to answer your question. We all are.

           

           

           

          0
        • #1023631
          AvatarAvatar
          T Rex

           the celtics need to rush to cut players right now, because the draft is 7 months away?

          You didn’t even think that 4 players are on expiring contracts, 5 if you include the Amir team option.

          And their rookies of all people are the guys they need to cut, two weeks into their rookie season?

          I’m now dumber for having taken the time to answer your question. We all are.

           

           

           

          0
          • #1023796
            AvatarAvatar
            ZachAttack
            Participant

             They need to get rid of players simply because they have too many people on their team. I mean, you decide would you rather get rid of a couple of crappy players, or get rid of Ben Simmons or Jaylen Brown? You tell me.

            0
          • #1023659
            AvatarAvatar
            ZachAttack
            Participant

             They need to get rid of players simply because they have too many people on their team. I mean, you decide would you rather get rid of a couple of crappy players, or get rid of Ben Simmons or Jaylen Brown? You tell me.

            0
            • #1023802
              AvatarAvatar
              I am an idiot
              Participant

              Celtics contracts expiring next year are; Turner, Lee, Sullinger, Zeller. 

              The first two have zero chance of resigning. Sulliger and Zeller should not get extended early, hard to tell if the team will eventually try to keep them.

              That would open up from 2 – 4 slots for incoming players. As the mock draft shows 8 Celtics picks (four first rounders) in the next draft, they will either have to make trades or let these guys go as well as not exercize the options on Smart, Olynyk, Johnson, Young or Jerebko. Something has to give here.

              At some point, the Celtics will have to give quantity for quality. That was exactly what happened with Garnet, but I am afraid lightning will not strike twice.

              But in Ainge’s defense, what is the alternative? Do you go the Philly route? Tank until you land a star? Maybe Simmons is that guy, but draft histories are littered with sure-things that failed utterly. Some due to injury, some due to the fact that evaluating a teenager who has played one year of college ball is a roll of the dice (remember that Turner was a #2 pick).

              Ainge has chosen to add to his asset list at every chance he gets. Each of those chances has failed to result in a star, but has added to the overall value of the roster. If you are looking for a plan other than "be available with a lot of things to offer when someone is looking to move a player" than you’ve come to the wrong place.

              It may not work, but they are a lot more fun to watch than Philly.

               

               

               

               

               

               

              0
            • #1023665
              AvatarAvatar
              I am an idiot
              Participant

              Celtics contracts expiring next year are; Turner, Lee, Sullinger, Zeller. 

              The first two have zero chance of resigning. Sulliger and Zeller should not get extended early, hard to tell if the team will eventually try to keep them.

              That would open up from 2 – 4 slots for incoming players. As the mock draft shows 8 Celtics picks (four first rounders) in the next draft, they will either have to make trades or let these guys go as well as not exercize the options on Smart, Olynyk, Johnson, Young or Jerebko. Something has to give here.

              At some point, the Celtics will have to give quantity for quality. That was exactly what happened with Garnet, but I am afraid lightning will not strike twice.

              But in Ainge’s defense, what is the alternative? Do you go the Philly route? Tank until you land a star? Maybe Simmons is that guy, but draft histories are littered with sure-things that failed utterly. Some due to injury, some due to the fact that evaluating a teenager who has played one year of college ball is a roll of the dice (remember that Turner was a #2 pick).

              Ainge has chosen to add to his asset list at every chance he gets. Each of those chances has failed to result in a star, but has added to the overall value of the roster. If you are looking for a plan other than "be available with a lot of things to offer when someone is looking to move a player" than you’ve come to the wrong place.

              It may not work, but they are a lot more fun to watch than Philly.

               

               

               

               

               

               

              0
  • #1023786
    AvatarAvatar
    Memphis Madness
    Participant

     Marc Gasol for some old Larry Bird jerseys, a Dee Brown poster, a used Red Aurbach cigar, 3 protected 2nd round draft picks, and fifty bucks cash paid out in one’s?

    DEAL!!!!

     

     

    0
  • #1023649
    AvatarAvatar
    Memphis Madness
    Participant

     Marc Gasol for some old Larry Bird jerseys, a Dee Brown poster, a used Red Aurbach cigar, 3 protected 2nd round draft picks, and fifty bucks cash paid out in one’s?

    DEAL!!!!

     

     

    0
  • #1023790
    AvatarAvatar
    Memphis Madness
    Participant

    Bring back Rick Pitino and let him utilize his, uh, recruiting strategies… 

    0
  • #1023653
    AvatarAvatar
    Memphis Madness
    Participant

    Bring back Rick Pitino and let him utilize his, uh, recruiting strategies… 

    0
  • #1023806
    AvatarAvatar
    Meditated States
    Participant

     Agreed. The Nets are garbage and the C’s are gonna have a fun time drafting in 2016. How they do this year record wise is irrelevant. Development of Terry,Smart,KO,Sully,Hunter. If their lucky, Ben Simmons or one of the plenty of good players in a top 3 pick.

    0
  • #1023669
    AvatarAvatar
    Meditated States
    Participant

     Agreed. The Nets are garbage and the C’s are gonna have a fun time drafting in 2016. How they do this year record wise is irrelevant. Development of Terry,Smart,KO,Sully,Hunter. If their lucky, Ben Simmons or one of the plenty of good players in a top 3 pick.

    0
  • #1023808
    AvatarAvatar
    WalkaFlocka
    Participant

     As a Celtics fan, I was let down by this past off-season. Since the Stevens/Ainge duo have taken over, I’ve kinda grown on the idea of this team, though. I’d like to argue that we have grown an identity: a gritty, hard working, chip-on-our-shoulder type of team.

    I think IT4, Smart, Crowder, Sully, and Olynyk are all good pieces that we should hold on for the long term. Amir and Bradley are great glue-guys. Plus, who knows when/IF Brooklyn will even win a game this year. That squarely puts us in the hunt for a top 5 pick. Dallas is nothing more than an 7/8 seed in the West and we will hover around that 8th seed again this year. That gives us possibly 3 top 18 picks, one of which is destined to be top 5.

    I think next year we could see a team really starting to take place. 

    0
  • #1023671
    AvatarAvatar
    WalkaFlocka
    Participant

     As a Celtics fan, I was let down by this past off-season. Since the Stevens/Ainge duo have taken over, I’ve kinda grown on the idea of this team, though. I’d like to argue that we have grown an identity: a gritty, hard working, chip-on-our-shoulder type of team.

    I think IT4, Smart, Crowder, Sully, and Olynyk are all good pieces that we should hold on for the long term. Amir and Bradley are great glue-guys. Plus, who knows when/IF Brooklyn will even win a game this year. That squarely puts us in the hunt for a top 5 pick. Dallas is nothing more than an 7/8 seed in the West and we will hover around that 8th seed again this year. That gives us possibly 3 top 18 picks, one of which is destined to be top 5.

    I think next year we could see a team really starting to take place. 

    0
    • #1023812
      AvatarAvatar
      markfitz14
      Participant

       This is like a bridge year. Next year will be on the other side and be clearer as to what players will emerge. This draft is huge for the Celts to determine first. Might have to wait until draft time to make any moves. We gotta see where our picks our first. Could be higher since Dallas might not even make playoffs. 

      Also would like to add to the identity. A team led by the coach Stevens with good game plans and great inbounds plays. 

       

      0
    • #1023675
      AvatarAvatar
      markfitz14
      Participant

       This is like a bridge year. Next year will be on the other side and be clearer as to what players will emerge. This draft is huge for the Celts to determine first. Might have to wait until draft time to make any moves. We gotta see where our picks our first. Could be higher since Dallas might not even make playoffs. 

      Also would like to add to the identity. A team led by the coach Stevens with good game plans and great inbounds plays. 

       

      0
  • #1023810
    AvatarAvatar
    markfitz14
    Participant

     I just dont see any team dealing top talent for picks with the Salary Cap rise. Every team is going to think we can sign one more good player with the increased Cap space and be right back in the title hunt. Timing is terribile to try to make a trade for great talent. OKC will even take the chance of just hoping Durant comes back without re-signing before he becomes a free agent. No teams are looking to trade there best player right now. 

    Basically the only option is to go the develop players option. Let Lee, Turner and Johnson(team option Pass on) walk at the end of the year to make room for incoming players. Maybe try to make a mid-level trade to free up some space in a couple positions. Like dealing Zeller, and Bradley. Who at this point I don’t see a need for them on the future team. Or package with a pick to try to move up a couple spots in the draft. Prbly can’t make that deal until draft night since the ping pong balls will determine that route. 

     

    0
  • #1023673
    AvatarAvatar
    markfitz14
    Participant

     I just dont see any team dealing top talent for picks with the Salary Cap rise. Every team is going to think we can sign one more good player with the increased Cap space and be right back in the title hunt. Timing is terribile to try to make a trade for great talent. OKC will even take the chance of just hoping Durant comes back without re-signing before he becomes a free agent. No teams are looking to trade there best player right now. 

    Basically the only option is to go the develop players option. Let Lee, Turner and Johnson(team option Pass on) walk at the end of the year to make room for incoming players. Maybe try to make a mid-level trade to free up some space in a couple positions. Like dealing Zeller, and Bradley. Who at this point I don’t see a need for them on the future team. Or package with a pick to try to move up a couple spots in the draft. Prbly can’t make that deal until draft night since the ping pong balls will determine that route. 

     

    0
  • #1023822
    AvatarAvatar
    I am an idiot
    Participant

    I don’t think it is just a matter of the cap. There are bound to be players that don’t fit their current team and need a move (are you listening Kings?). The C’s should be in the mix for each of them.

    I agree that most of the free agents that represent a significant upgrade in personnel will resign with their current teams. The max contract rules tip the playing field in that direction. If you don’t want or have a rift with your star player, on the other hand, it is better to deal him before the contract expires.

    0
  • #1023685
    AvatarAvatar
    I am an idiot
    Participant

    I don’t think it is just a matter of the cap. There are bound to be players that don’t fit their current team and need a move (are you listening Kings?). The C’s should be in the mix for each of them.

    I agree that most of the free agents that represent a significant upgrade in personnel will resign with their current teams. The max contract rules tip the playing field in that direction. If you don’t want or have a rift with your star player, on the other hand, it is better to deal him before the contract expires.

    0
  • #1023881
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

     I am afraid that they will make a Stupid offer to Clarkson from the Lakers.  

    0
  • #1023743
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

     I am afraid that they will make a Stupid offer to Clarkson from the Lakers.  

    0
  • #1023747
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

     The Celtics have a lot of good young pieces and have a load of picks due but IMO they lack that star player to really take the team back into contention, Maybe they need to get a very high draft pick one year and build around him or try and trade for a top player.

    Top FAs want legit pieces in place before they join a team so Boston’s good set of young role players may not appeal to a top FA at this moment.

    Ainge could have probably got a new big 3 or at least omne top player in if he had wanted to but he’s content to stockpile assets and let Brad Stevens find out who are the key players they want to keep.

     

     

    0
  • #1023885
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

     The Celtics have a lot of good young pieces and have a load of picks due but IMO they lack that star player to really take the team back into contention, Maybe they need to get a very high draft pick one year and build around him or try and trade for a top player.

    Top FAs want legit pieces in place before they join a team so Boston’s good set of young role players may not appeal to a top FA at this moment.

    Ainge could have probably got a new big 3 or at least omne top player in if he had wanted to but he’s content to stockpile assets and let Brad Stevens find out who are the key players they want to keep.

     

     

    0
  • #1023749
    AvatarAvatar
    nateval
    Participant

     I hate to add fuel to T-Rex’s fire but Olynyk was +24 last night in 22 minutes. When Olynyk got on the floor the Celtics went on a run no doubt. 

    0
  • #1023887
    AvatarAvatar
    nateval
    Participant

     I hate to add fuel to T-Rex’s fire but Olynyk was +24 last night in 22 minutes. When Olynyk got on the floor the Celtics went on a run no doubt. 

    0
  • #1023755
    AvatarAvatar
    I am an idiot
    Participant

    Watched the game last night. It really showcased the C’s depth. Thomas did not have a great game (in spite of being leading scorer), Smart was out and Bradley played limited minutes. They still kicked the crap out of a team with, supposedly, more talent while on the road.

    BTW the Freak just keeps improving his game. He’s scary enough as it is, in a couple of years…

     

      

    0
  • #1023893
    AvatarAvatar
    I am an idiot
    Participant

    Watched the game last night. It really showcased the C’s depth. Thomas did not have a great game (in spite of being leading scorer), Smart was out and Bradley played limited minutes. They still kicked the crap out of a team with, supposedly, more talent while on the road.

    BTW the Freak just keeps improving his game. He’s scary enough as it is, in a couple of years…

     

      

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login