This topic contains 30 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by
Bed Head 11 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 12:22am #60314

kobyzParticipant0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 5:18am #989203
7-9ParticipantI would have to say Kristaps Porzingas. Mudiay is going to be at the very least a solid pro, because he has the body. Porzingas is ‘rail’ thin; and if he doesn’t get playing time from the onset…. well can you say "Darko,Darko!"
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 5:18am #989351
7-9ParticipantI would have to say Kristaps Porzingas. Mudiay is going to be at the very least a solid pro, because he has the body. Porzingas is ‘rail’ thin; and if he doesn’t get playing time from the onset…. well can you say "Darko,Darko!"
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 5:34am #989215
zer0d0ubtMudiay, by far.
John Henson with a nice 3 point shot is worth more than Rodney Stuckey.
Combo guards with shaky decision making and a shaky jump shot are almost literally a dime a dozen.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 5:34am #989363
zer0d0ubtMudiay, by far.
John Henson with a nice 3 point shot is worth more than Rodney Stuckey.
Combo guards with shaky decision making and a shaky jump shot are almost literally a dime a dozen.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 11:31am #989553
AstroParticipantI watch a lot of Wizards games, so I’m familiar with John Wall’s development in the league.
Mudiay is similar enough to Wall – big, athletic PG who loves to get out on the break and can penetrate and dish in the halfcourt as well as run the PnR.
Wall is probably more athletic overall (especially speed and quickness), but Mudiay is a better finisher at the bucket at this stage (stronger body and more craftiness around the rim – early on Wall was a fourth-gear runner who wasn’t an elite finisher through contact.)
But this is all minor difference. Again, Mudiay, like Wall, is a big athletic guard, with a shaky jumpshot who will have no trouble using his tools to create for himself or others in the half-court and has the upside to be an outstanding defender.
I think it’s easy to exaggerate minor flaws in a prospect and talk yourself into underrating someone. Mudiay has a rare combination of size, athleticism and sufficiently developed skill for PG. He is not some combo guard like a Stuckey. He is a PG if anything.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 11:31am #989406
AstroParticipantI watch a lot of Wizards games, so I’m familiar with John Wall’s development in the league.
Mudiay is similar enough to Wall – big, athletic PG who loves to get out on the break and can penetrate and dish in the halfcourt as well as run the PnR.
Wall is probably more athletic overall (especially speed and quickness), but Mudiay is a better finisher at the bucket at this stage (stronger body and more craftiness around the rim – early on Wall was a fourth-gear runner who wasn’t an elite finisher through contact.)
But this is all minor difference. Again, Mudiay, like Wall, is a big athletic guard, with a shaky jumpshot who will have no trouble using his tools to create for himself or others in the half-court and has the upside to be an outstanding defender.
I think it’s easy to exaggerate minor flaws in a prospect and talk yourself into underrating someone. Mudiay has a rare combination of size, athleticism and sufficiently developed skill for PG. He is not some combo guard like a Stuckey. He is a PG if anything.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 11:34am #989555
zer0d0ubtMudiay admitted he gained 9 pounds. Which keen observers have noted, along with his corresponding loss of explosiveness.
Now he’s athletic like Dion Waiters is athletic, and nothing like John Wall.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 11:34am #989408
zer0d0ubtMudiay admitted he gained 9 pounds. Which keen observers have noted, along with his corresponding loss of explosiveness.
Now he’s athletic like Dion Waiters is athletic, and nothing like John Wall.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 11:48am #989561
AstroParticipantIf it’s bad weight, he can drop it. If it’s muscle, well, Lebron is less explosive horizontally at his weight than he was as a rookie and he seems to manage. The real test is ability to finish through contact.
Either way, it’s a blip. I’m looking at his season in China, and he showed a lot of PG skills.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 11:48am #989414
AstroParticipantIf it’s bad weight, he can drop it. If it’s muscle, well, Lebron is less explosive horizontally at his weight than he was as a rookie and he seems to manage. The real test is ability to finish through contact.
Either way, it’s a blip. I’m looking at his season in China, and he showed a lot of PG skills.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 11:48am #989563

holefillers1Participantyeah from the very limited video out there I feel Mudiay’s athleticism is overrated too. And when compared to John Wall I see no comparison. We do not live in a vacuum. There will be busts in this draft. I will roll with a stretch four who can shoot and has a nasty streak over a guy who most scouts know little about.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 11:48am #989416

holefillers1Participantyeah from the very limited video out there I feel Mudiay’s athleticism is overrated too. And when compared to John Wall I see no comparison. We do not live in a vacuum. There will be busts in this draft. I will roll with a stretch four who can shoot and has a nasty streak over a guy who most scouts know little about.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 12:02pm #989565
AstroParticipant…and Porzingis may very well be the bust.
You’re basically betting that he can bulk up, not lose mobility and be able to defend in the NBA.
Right now he’s a nonentity on defense in the NBA at his weight. Look at his highlights, he gets pushed around by 205 lb. guys.
So Porzingis’ lack of weight by a good 25 lbs. is less of a big deal than Mudiay’s minor blip of a gain?
I think Porzingis is the much more risky pick. You want a 2 way player high in the lottery.
So again, you’re betting the farm he can bulk up and everything else stays the same.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2015 - 12:02pm #989418
AstroParticipant…and Porzingis may very well be the bust.
You’re basically betting that he can bulk up, not lose mobility and be able to defend in the NBA.
Right now he’s a nonentity on defense in the NBA at his weight. Look at his highlights, he gets pushed around by 205 lb. guys.
So Porzingis’ lack of weight by a good 25 lbs. is less of a big deal than Mudiay’s minor blip of a gain?
I think Porzingis is the much more risky pick. You want a 2 way player high in the lottery.
So again, you’re betting the farm he can bulk up and everything else stays the same.
0- Posted on: Tue, 06/16/2015 - 6:39am #990220
zer0d0ubtPorzingis is way more of a two way player than Mudiay. Way more.
Porzingis hasn’t been measured like everybody else, but his standing reach is probably like 9’5" or higher.
Anthony Davis gets pushed around more than people like to admit, but he’s still a two way player. And Porzingis probably has a 4"-7" standing reach advantage.
WCS is going to get pushed around too. It doesn’t mean he isn’t a defensive player.
Meanwhile, the reasons you assume Mudiay to be a two way player are year old video clips and scouting reports, which describe an athleticism level that simply isn’t there today. Not surprising considering he’s gained 10 lbs since his high flying act at Hoops Summit.
And Mudiay doesn’t have a great wingspan, unlike most star guards. Mudiay will be solid defensively against shooting guards, but starting point guards are going to blow by him consistently.
Regardless of what the year old scouting reports say.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 06/16/2015 - 6:39am #990074
zer0d0ubtPorzingis is way more of a two way player than Mudiay. Way more.
Porzingis hasn’t been measured like everybody else, but his standing reach is probably like 9’5" or higher.
Anthony Davis gets pushed around more than people like to admit, but he’s still a two way player. And Porzingis probably has a 4"-7" standing reach advantage.
WCS is going to get pushed around too. It doesn’t mean he isn’t a defensive player.
Meanwhile, the reasons you assume Mudiay to be a two way player are year old video clips and scouting reports, which describe an athleticism level that simply isn’t there today. Not surprising considering he’s gained 10 lbs since his high flying act at Hoops Summit.
And Mudiay doesn’t have a great wingspan, unlike most star guards. Mudiay will be solid defensively against shooting guards, but starting point guards are going to blow by him consistently.
Regardless of what the year old scouting reports say.
0
- Posted on: Tue, 06/16/2015 - 6:33am #990214
cycloParticipantI would say Mudiay. If he can’t shoot, he’ll bust, and be the PG equivalent to Shannon Brown.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 06/16/2015 - 6:33am #990068
cycloParticipantI would say Mudiay. If he can’t shoot, he’ll bust, and be the PG equivalent to Shannon Brown.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 06/16/2015 - 7:34am #990240
machu46ParticipantPorzingis is thin, but he’s steadily packing on weight. I believe one of the NBA scouts said he’s up to 235 now and has gained 20+ lbs over the past 12 months.
His trainer said they’re focusing on slowly adding weight instead of bulking him up like crazy because they want his body to comfortably adjust to it; and he credited that as being one of the big reasons Porzingis is so coordinated for a 7’0"-7’1" guy.
Regarding bust potential, I’d probably say Porzingis is more likely to be a complete bust, but I don’t think either one will be. They might not live up to their potential, but I think both will at least be solid players in the NBA, and I personally prefer Porzingis as a prospect.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 06/16/2015 - 7:34am #990094
machu46ParticipantPorzingis is thin, but he’s steadily packing on weight. I believe one of the NBA scouts said he’s up to 235 now and has gained 20+ lbs over the past 12 months.
His trainer said they’re focusing on slowly adding weight instead of bulking him up like crazy because they want his body to comfortably adjust to it; and he credited that as being one of the big reasons Porzingis is so coordinated for a 7’0"-7’1" guy.
Regarding bust potential, I’d probably say Porzingis is more likely to be a complete bust, but I don’t think either one will be. They might not live up to their potential, but I think both will at least be solid players in the NBA, and I personally prefer Porzingis as a prospect.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 7:23am #992325
lucasjohn40Porzingis and Mudiay will turn out at least a NBA All Star. I think KAT or for sure Justice Winslow will be bigger busts than Porzingis or Mudiay.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 7:23am #992183
lucasjohn40Porzingis and Mudiay will turn out at least a NBA All Star. I think KAT or for sure Justice Winslow will be bigger busts than Porzingis or Mudiay.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 8:24am #992339
CoachWyersParticipantI think out of the two Pozingis is a better fit for the Knicks, but I also think he has the bigger bust potential as well. Winslow is in the discussion for the #4, but I think the Knicks rather trade back a few picks and get another asset in order to get him. All three of these players would be great for the Knicks to get because they are all upgrades over what the Knicks already have and they all have very high upsides.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 8:24am #992197
CoachWyersParticipantI think out of the two Pozingis is a better fit for the Knicks, but I also think he has the bigger bust potential as well. Winslow is in the discussion for the #4, but I think the Knicks rather trade back a few picks and get another asset in order to get him. All three of these players would be great for the Knicks to get because they are all upgrades over what the Knicks already have and they all have very high upsides.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 9:14am #992355
TankensteinParticipantI worry about Porzingis’ narrow shoulders, thin frame and Charmin softness. 3 rebounds a game at 7’1?!
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 9:14am #992212
TankensteinParticipantI worry about Porzingis’ narrow shoulders, thin frame and Charmin softness. 3 rebounds a game at 7’1?!
0- Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 10:30am #992363
cycloParticipantYou can’t apply Euro league stats to the NBA game. Nobody who understands the game does that. Certainly not the scouts who rate Porzingis so highly. In Europe young players play only 1/2 a game or less. Often much less.
Euro rebounding at age 19:
Pau Gasol (1999-2000) 2.3 rebounds in 13.1 minutes per game
Marc Gasol (2004-2005) 3.7 rebounds in 16.2 minutes per game
Kristaps Porzingis (2014-2015) 4.8 rebounds in 21.7 minutes per game
He’s on par.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 10:30am #992220
cycloParticipantYou can’t apply Euro league stats to the NBA game. Nobody who understands the game does that. Certainly not the scouts who rate Porzingis so highly. In Europe young players play only 1/2 a game or less. Often much less.
Euro rebounding at age 19:
Pau Gasol (1999-2000) 2.3 rebounds in 13.1 minutes per game
Marc Gasol (2004-2005) 3.7 rebounds in 16.2 minutes per game
Kristaps Porzingis (2014-2015) 4.8 rebounds in 21.7 minutes per game
He’s on par.
0
- Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 2:51pm #992286

Bed HeadParticipantMinutes played is a major reason for that, though hardly the only one. You also have wildly varying levels of competition, a somewhat different style of play, lots of "travel issues", etc, etc, etc.
In all seriousness, John Forbes Nash Jr. would have struggled to make sense of these numbers (let alone "translate" them to the NBA):
http://www.basketball-reference.com/euro/players/kristaps-porzingis-1.html
At any rate, Porzingis will be just fine … particularly provided he ends up in Orlando or Sacramento (as opposed to Philly or NY).
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/21/2015 - 2:51pm #992428

Bed HeadParticipantMinutes played is a major reason for that, though hardly the only one. You also have wildly varying levels of competition, a somewhat different style of play, lots of "travel issues", etc, etc, etc.
In all seriousness, John Forbes Nash Jr. would have struggled to make sense of these numbers (let alone "translate" them to the NBA):
http://www.basketball-reference.com/euro/players/kristaps-porzingis-1.html
At any rate, Porzingis will be just fine … particularly provided he ends up in Orlando or Sacramento (as opposed to Philly or NY).
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |
About the knicks pick, it seems like top 3 are set in stone with Townes, Okafor and Russell… so It’s looking that for the fourth pick it’s between Porzingas and Mudiay, they seems to have same ceiling, if it’s between the two that means knicks should take the one has less bust potential, so who has more bust potential? also i wanna know why is Winslow under the radar and is not up there in the discussion for the fourth pick? he has a lot of upside imo and it might be better for the knicks to take him as he is more of a sure thing and fit well as a one two punch next to Melo…