This topic contains 30 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Bed Head 11 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #60314
    AvatarAvatar
    kobyz
    Participant

    About the knicks pick, it seems like top 3 are set in stone with Townes, Okafor and Russell… so It’s looking that for the fourth pick it’s between Porzingas and Mudiay, they seems to have same ceiling, if it’s between the two that means knicks should take the one has less bust potential, so who has more bust potential? also i wanna know why is Winslow under the radar and is not up there in the discussion for the fourth pick? he has a lot of upside imo and it might be better for the knicks to take him as he is more of a sure thing and fit well as a one two punch next to Melo…

    0
  • #989203
    AvatarAvatar
    7-9
    Participant

    I would have to say Kristaps Porzingas. Mudiay is going to be at the very least a solid pro, because he has the body. Porzingas is ‘rail’ thin; and if he doesn’t get playing time from the onset…. well can you say "Darko,Darko!"

    0
  • #989351
    AvatarAvatar
    7-9
    Participant

    I would have to say Kristaps Porzingas. Mudiay is going to be at the very least a solid pro, because he has the body. Porzingas is ‘rail’ thin; and if he doesn’t get playing time from the onset…. well can you say "Darko,Darko!"

    0
  • #989215
    AvatarAvatar
    zer0d0ubt

     Mudiay, by far.

    John Henson with a nice 3 point shot is worth more than Rodney Stuckey.

    Combo guards with shaky decision making and a shaky jump shot are almost literally a dime a dozen.

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #989363
    AvatarAvatar
    zer0d0ubt

     Mudiay, by far.

    John Henson with a nice 3 point shot is worth more than Rodney Stuckey.

    Combo guards with shaky decision making and a shaky jump shot are almost literally a dime a dozen.

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #989553
    AvatarAvatar
    Astro
    Participant

    I watch a lot of Wizards games, so I’m familiar with John Wall’s development in the league.

    Mudiay is similar enough to Wall – big, athletic PG who loves to get out on the break and can penetrate and dish in the halfcourt as well as run the PnR.

    Wall is probably more athletic overall (especially speed and quickness), but Mudiay is a better finisher at the bucket at this stage (stronger body and more craftiness around the rim – early on Wall was a fourth-gear runner who wasn’t an elite finisher through contact.)

    But this is all minor difference. Again, Mudiay, like Wall, is a big athletic guard, with a shaky jumpshot who will have no trouble using his tools to create for himself or others in the half-court and has the upside to be an outstanding defender.

    I think it’s easy to exaggerate minor flaws in a prospect and talk yourself into underrating someone. Mudiay has a rare combination of size, athleticism and sufficiently developed skill for PG. He is not some combo guard like a Stuckey. He is a PG if anything.

    0
  • #989406
    AvatarAvatar
    Astro
    Participant

    I watch a lot of Wizards games, so I’m familiar with John Wall’s development in the league.

    Mudiay is similar enough to Wall – big, athletic PG who loves to get out on the break and can penetrate and dish in the halfcourt as well as run the PnR.

    Wall is probably more athletic overall (especially speed and quickness), but Mudiay is a better finisher at the bucket at this stage (stronger body and more craftiness around the rim – early on Wall was a fourth-gear runner who wasn’t an elite finisher through contact.)

    But this is all minor difference. Again, Mudiay, like Wall, is a big athletic guard, with a shaky jumpshot who will have no trouble using his tools to create for himself or others in the half-court and has the upside to be an outstanding defender.

    I think it’s easy to exaggerate minor flaws in a prospect and talk yourself into underrating someone. Mudiay has a rare combination of size, athleticism and sufficiently developed skill for PG. He is not some combo guard like a Stuckey. He is a PG if anything.

    0
  • #989555
    AvatarAvatar
    zer0d0ubt

     Mudiay admitted he gained 9 pounds. Which keen observers have noted, along with his corresponding loss of explosiveness.

    Now he’s athletic like Dion Waiters is athletic, and nothing like John Wall.

     

     

     

    0
  • #989408
    AvatarAvatar
    zer0d0ubt

     Mudiay admitted he gained 9 pounds. Which keen observers have noted, along with his corresponding loss of explosiveness.

    Now he’s athletic like Dion Waiters is athletic, and nothing like John Wall.

     

     

     

    0
  • #989561
    AvatarAvatar
    Astro
    Participant

     If it’s bad weight, he can drop it.  If it’s muscle, well, Lebron is less explosive horizontally at his weight than he was as a rookie and he seems to manage.  The real test is ability to finish through contact.

    Either way, it’s a blip.  I’m looking at his season in China, and he showed a lot of PG skills.

     

     

    0
  • #989414
    AvatarAvatar
    Astro
    Participant

     If it’s bad weight, he can drop it.  If it’s muscle, well, Lebron is less explosive horizontally at his weight than he was as a rookie and he seems to manage.  The real test is ability to finish through contact.

    Either way, it’s a blip.  I’m looking at his season in China, and he showed a lot of PG skills.

     

     

    0
  • #989563
    AvatarAvatar
    holefillers1
    Participant

     yeah from the very limited video out there I feel Mudiay’s athleticism is overrated too. And when compared to John Wall  I see no comparison.  We do not live in a vacuum. There will be busts in this draft. I will roll with a stretch four who can shoot and has a nasty streak over a guy who most scouts know little about.

    0
  • #989416
    AvatarAvatar
    holefillers1
    Participant

     yeah from the very limited video out there I feel Mudiay’s athleticism is overrated too. And when compared to John Wall  I see no comparison.  We do not live in a vacuum. There will be busts in this draft. I will roll with a stretch four who can shoot and has a nasty streak over a guy who most scouts know little about.

    0
  • #989565
    AvatarAvatar
    Astro
    Participant

     …and Porzingis may very well be the bust.

    You’re basically betting that he can bulk up, not lose mobility and be able to defend in the NBA.

    Right now he’s a nonentity on defense in the NBA at his weight.  Look at his highlights, he gets pushed around by 205 lb. guys.

    So Porzingis’ lack of weight by a good 25 lbs. is less of a big deal than Mudiay’s minor blip of a gain?

    I think Porzingis is the much more risky pick.  You want a 2 way player high in the lottery.

    So again, you’re betting the farm he can bulk up and everything else stays the same.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #989418
    AvatarAvatar
    Astro
    Participant

     …and Porzingis may very well be the bust.

    You’re basically betting that he can bulk up, not lose mobility and be able to defend in the NBA.

    Right now he’s a nonentity on defense in the NBA at his weight.  Look at his highlights, he gets pushed around by 205 lb. guys.

    So Porzingis’ lack of weight by a good 25 lbs. is less of a big deal than Mudiay’s minor blip of a gain?

    I think Porzingis is the much more risky pick.  You want a 2 way player high in the lottery.

    So again, you’re betting the farm he can bulk up and everything else stays the same.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0
    • #990220
      AvatarAvatar
      zer0d0ubt

       Porzingis is way more of a two way player than Mudiay. Way more.

      Porzingis hasn’t been measured like everybody else, but his standing reach is probably like 9’5" or higher.

      Anthony Davis gets pushed around more than people like to admit, but he’s still a two way player. And Porzingis probably has a 4"-7" standing reach advantage.

      WCS is going to get pushed around too. It doesn’t mean he isn’t a defensive player.

      Meanwhile, the reasons you assume Mudiay to be a two way player are year old video clips and scouting reports, which describe an athleticism level that simply isn’t there today. Not surprising considering he’s gained 10 lbs since his high flying act at Hoops Summit. 

      And Mudiay doesn’t have a great wingspan, unlike most star guards. Mudiay will be solid defensively against shooting guards, but starting point guards are going to blow by him consistently.

      Regardless of what the year old scouting reports say.

       

       

      0
    • #990074
      AvatarAvatar
      zer0d0ubt

       Porzingis is way more of a two way player than Mudiay. Way more.

      Porzingis hasn’t been measured like everybody else, but his standing reach is probably like 9’5" or higher.

      Anthony Davis gets pushed around more than people like to admit, but he’s still a two way player. And Porzingis probably has a 4"-7" standing reach advantage.

      WCS is going to get pushed around too. It doesn’t mean he isn’t a defensive player.

      Meanwhile, the reasons you assume Mudiay to be a two way player are year old video clips and scouting reports, which describe an athleticism level that simply isn’t there today. Not surprising considering he’s gained 10 lbs since his high flying act at Hoops Summit. 

      And Mudiay doesn’t have a great wingspan, unlike most star guards. Mudiay will be solid defensively against shooting guards, but starting point guards are going to blow by him consistently.

      Regardless of what the year old scouting reports say.

       

       

      0
  • #990214
    AvatarAvatar
    cyclo
    Participant

     I would say Mudiay.  If he can’t shoot, he’ll bust, and be the PG equivalent to Shannon Brown.

    0
  • #990068
    AvatarAvatar
    cyclo
    Participant

     I would say Mudiay.  If he can’t shoot, he’ll bust, and be the PG equivalent to Shannon Brown.

    0
  • #990240
    AvatarAvatar
    machu46
    Participant

    Porzingis is thin, but he’s steadily packing on weight.  I believe one of the NBA scouts said he’s up to 235 now and has gained 20+ lbs over the past 12 months.

    His trainer said they’re focusing on slowly adding weight instead of bulking him up like crazy because they want his body to comfortably adjust to it; and he credited that as being one of the big reasons Porzingis is so coordinated for a 7’0"-7’1" guy.

    Regarding bust potential, I’d probably say Porzingis is more likely to be a complete bust, but I don’t think either one will be.  They might not live up to their potential, but I think both will at least be solid players in the NBA, and I personally prefer Porzingis as a prospect.

     

     

     

    0
  • #990094
    AvatarAvatar
    machu46
    Participant

    Porzingis is thin, but he’s steadily packing on weight.  I believe one of the NBA scouts said he’s up to 235 now and has gained 20+ lbs over the past 12 months.

    His trainer said they’re focusing on slowly adding weight instead of bulking him up like crazy because they want his body to comfortably adjust to it; and he credited that as being one of the big reasons Porzingis is so coordinated for a 7’0"-7’1" guy.

    Regarding bust potential, I’d probably say Porzingis is more likely to be a complete bust, but I don’t think either one will be.  They might not live up to their potential, but I think both will at least be solid players in the NBA, and I personally prefer Porzingis as a prospect.

     

     

     

    0
  • #992325
    AvatarAvatar
    lucasjohn40

     Porzingis and Mudiay will turn out at least a NBA All Star. I think KAT or for sure Justice Winslow will be bigger busts than Porzingis or Mudiay.

    0
  • #992183
    AvatarAvatar
    lucasjohn40

     Porzingis and Mudiay will turn out at least a NBA All Star. I think KAT or for sure Justice Winslow will be bigger busts than Porzingis or Mudiay.

    0
  • #992339
    AvatarAvatar
    CoachWyers
    Participant

    I think out of the two Pozingis is a better fit for the Knicks, but I also think he has the bigger bust potential as well. Winslow is in the discussion for the #4, but I think the Knicks rather trade back a few picks and get another asset in order to get him. All three of these players would be great for the Knicks to get because they are all upgrades over what the Knicks already have and they all have very high upsides.

    0
  • #992197
    AvatarAvatar
    CoachWyers
    Participant

    I think out of the two Pozingis is a better fit for the Knicks, but I also think he has the bigger bust potential as well. Winslow is in the discussion for the #4, but I think the Knicks rather trade back a few picks and get another asset in order to get him. All three of these players would be great for the Knicks to get because they are all upgrades over what the Knicks already have and they all have very high upsides.

    0
  • #992355
    AvatarAvatar
    Tankenstein
    Participant

     I worry about Porzingis’ narrow shoulders, thin frame and Charmin softness. 3 rebounds a game at 7’1?!

    0
  • #992212
    AvatarAvatar
    Tankenstein
    Participant

     I worry about Porzingis’ narrow shoulders, thin frame and Charmin softness. 3 rebounds a game at 7’1?!

    0
    • #992363
      AvatarAvatar
      cyclo
      Participant

      You can’t apply Euro league stats to the NBA game.  Nobody who understands the game does that.  Certainly not the scouts who rate Porzingis so highly.  In Europe young players play only 1/2 a game or less.  Often much less.

      Euro rebounding at age 19:

      Pau Gasol (1999-2000) 2.3 rebounds in 13.1 minutes per game

      Marc Gasol (2004-2005) 3.7 rebounds in 16.2 minutes per game 

      Kristaps Porzingis (2014-2015) 4.8 rebounds in 21.7 minutes per game

      He’s on par.

       

       

      0
    • #992220
      AvatarAvatar
      cyclo
      Participant

      You can’t apply Euro league stats to the NBA game.  Nobody who understands the game does that.  Certainly not the scouts who rate Porzingis so highly.  In Europe young players play only 1/2 a game or less.  Often much less.

      Euro rebounding at age 19:

      Pau Gasol (1999-2000) 2.3 rebounds in 13.1 minutes per game

      Marc Gasol (2004-2005) 3.7 rebounds in 16.2 minutes per game 

      Kristaps Porzingis (2014-2015) 4.8 rebounds in 21.7 minutes per game

      He’s on par.

       

       

      0
  • #992286
    AvatarAvatar
    Bed Head
    Participant

    Minutes played is a major reason for that, though hardly the only one. You also have wildly varying levels of competition, a somewhat different style of play, lots of "travel issues", etc, etc, etc.

    In all seriousness, John Forbes Nash Jr. would have struggled to make sense of these numbers (let alone "translate" them to the NBA):

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/euro/players/kristaps-porzingis-1.html

     

    At any rate, Porzingis will be just fine … particularly provided he ends up in Orlando or Sacramento (as opposed to Philly or NY).

    0
  • #992428
    AvatarAvatar
    Bed Head
    Participant

    Minutes played is a major reason for that, though hardly the only one. You also have wildly varying levels of competition, a somewhat different style of play, lots of "travel issues", etc, etc, etc.

    In all seriousness, John Forbes Nash Jr. would have struggled to make sense of these numbers (let alone "translate" them to the NBA):

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/euro/players/kristaps-porzingis-1.html

     

    At any rate, Porzingis will be just fine … particularly provided he ends up in Orlando or Sacramento (as opposed to Philly or NY).

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login