This topic contains 34 replies, has 16 voices, and was last updated by
BothTeamsPlayedHard 11 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 4:13pm #57493

Prime TimeParticipantThe Boston Celtics signed Evan Turner using a portion of the mid-level exception.
Low-risk/high-reward signing for a re buildings C’s team, although they are starting to have a log-jam on the wing with Green, Bradley, Smart(will play 1 & 2), Young, Turner, and a couple of non-guaranteed wings.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 4:40pm #938846
treytalkssports.comParticipantI was struggling with this move, but then I got looking at it. First, they have 18 players under contract going into next season. That has to mean that a trade is going to happen. I know they can cut Bogans, Babb, Johnson, and/or Pressey, but I don’t think Ainge would just cut an asset like Bogans non-guaranteed contract. In all likelihood, a Rondo trade is about to happen, but if not, I definitely could see Green and/or Bass getting traded to a contender looking for one more piece.
Second, even though Young and Bradley play the same ‘position’ as Turner, they do not play the same style. I think Stevens plans to have Turner, Smart, Pressey, and (possibly) Rondo initiate the offense with Young, Bradley, and Thorton working off of the initiators by attacking closeouts and in catch-and-shoot situations.
I’m still kind of waiting to see this roster take shape. I know it might be another year, but all of these mis-matched pieces really bug me. I want to see them working together in sync to win games.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 4:40pm #938713
treytalkssports.comParticipantI was struggling with this move, but then I got looking at it. First, they have 18 players under contract going into next season. That has to mean that a trade is going to happen. I know they can cut Bogans, Babb, Johnson, and/or Pressey, but I don’t think Ainge would just cut an asset like Bogans non-guaranteed contract. In all likelihood, a Rondo trade is about to happen, but if not, I definitely could see Green and/or Bass getting traded to a contender looking for one more piece.
Second, even though Young and Bradley play the same ‘position’ as Turner, they do not play the same style. I think Stevens plans to have Turner, Smart, Pressey, and (possibly) Rondo initiate the offense with Young, Bradley, and Thorton working off of the initiators by attacking closeouts and in catch-and-shoot situations.
I’m still kind of waiting to see this roster take shape. I know it might be another year, but all of these mis-matched pieces really bug me. I want to see them working together in sync to win games.
0- Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 4:53pm #938850
UnbiasedObserverParticipantEh, these pieces really aren’t that mismatched. Danny Ainge has a plan, and I don’t think he trades Rondo. But I do believe someone else is going to be on the move, we are definitely going to move an SG and a SF. Hopefully its Jeff Green. I’ve never seen a player as big a tease as Jeff Green. He plays like a superstar and blows up for 40 one night and gets 6 points 3 rebounds and an assist the next game. Don’t be so quick to jump on the trade Rondo bandwagon. He is a championship caliber PG and his value is at an all time low. I think the Celtics take their chances next summer and try to re-sign Rondo to a long term deal.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 4:53pm #938718
UnbiasedObserverParticipantEh, these pieces really aren’t that mismatched. Danny Ainge has a plan, and I don’t think he trades Rondo. But I do believe someone else is going to be on the move, we are definitely going to move an SG and a SF. Hopefully its Jeff Green. I’ve never seen a player as big a tease as Jeff Green. He plays like a superstar and blows up for 40 one night and gets 6 points 3 rebounds and an assist the next game. Don’t be so quick to jump on the trade Rondo bandwagon. He is a championship caliber PG and his value is at an all time low. I think the Celtics take their chances next summer and try to re-sign Rondo to a long term deal.
0
- Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 4:51pm #938848

omphalosParticipantTerrible move. Turner will stifle Young’s development. The Celtics have really disappointed me the last two offseasons with their drafting and signings.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 4:51pm #938715

omphalosParticipantTerrible move. Turner will stifle Young’s development. The Celtics have really disappointed me the last two offseasons with their drafting and signings.
0- Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 5:58pm #938863

TRC1991ParticipantWhat do you mean? Kelly Olynyk ended the season on a really strong note and both Marcus Smart and James Young have loads of potential…
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 5:58pm #938731

TRC1991ParticipantWhat do you mean? Kelly Olynyk ended the season on a really strong note and both Marcus Smart and James Young have loads of potential…
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 6:00pm #938865

3 No Biases 3ParticipantAlthough I dont agree that this is a terrible move or that Turner will hurt Young in any way, I am also dissappointed with their aquisitions recently.
I think they killed any chance of landing Love or another star player in general when they drafted Smart. I like Smart a lot but now it appears they are going into rebuild mode instead of adding pieces around Rondo. They should have drafted a need, tried to trade for Love, have a winning season, and entice free agents to join Rondo and Love next year and build something special. Instead they are banking on Smart becoming as good as Rondo and even then they aren’t gonna be winning any time soon…oh well, I guess we’ll see.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 6:00pm #938733

3 No Biases 3ParticipantAlthough I dont agree that this is a terrible move or that Turner will hurt Young in any way, I am also dissappointed with their aquisitions recently.
I think they killed any chance of landing Love or another star player in general when they drafted Smart. I like Smart a lot but now it appears they are going into rebuild mode instead of adding pieces around Rondo. They should have drafted a need, tried to trade for Love, have a winning season, and entice free agents to join Rondo and Love next year and build something special. Instead they are banking on Smart becoming as good as Rondo and even then they aren’t gonna be winning any time soon…oh well, I guess we’ll see.
0- Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 8:16am #938849
celtics1982ParticipantLove the move and think Danny is collecting assets, nothing more nothing less. I don’t have any problem with Danny’s drafting, he’s done a great job! Sure he could have taken Dieng or Adztoubo last year and not traded away two second rounders to Dallas, but Kelly seems to be a rotation player at worst and a starter at best. You have to remember as it stand right now, last year draft was very weak. I know it’s early, but it must have been one of the worst rookies classes based on production in history.
In the NBA you never draft for need, you always take the best player. It’s like NBA 101. I would have loved getting Love, but it’s not going to happen. I don’t see the wolves trading Love until the trade deadline. I’m sure they want one last try to make the playoffs and try to change his mind. As for Rondo, I try and resign him. I’d give him a 4 year 48 million deal or wait till the season starts and offer him a 5 year deal at 12 million per ( I think he can get 5 years if he has less then one year on current deal, not sure). I just don’t think he takes it and I’m not giving Rondo max money. That’s why I think we need to trade him. Chances are Danny will hope Rondo has a good half season and raises his value and then trade him at trade deadline.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 8:16am #938981
celtics1982ParticipantLove the move and think Danny is collecting assets, nothing more nothing less. I don’t have any problem with Danny’s drafting, he’s done a great job! Sure he could have taken Dieng or Adztoubo last year and not traded away two second rounders to Dallas, but Kelly seems to be a rotation player at worst and a starter at best. You have to remember as it stand right now, last year draft was very weak. I know it’s early, but it must have been one of the worst rookies classes based on production in history.
In the NBA you never draft for need, you always take the best player. It’s like NBA 101. I would have loved getting Love, but it’s not going to happen. I don’t see the wolves trading Love until the trade deadline. I’m sure they want one last try to make the playoffs and try to change his mind. As for Rondo, I try and resign him. I’d give him a 4 year 48 million deal or wait till the season starts and offer him a 5 year deal at 12 million per ( I think he can get 5 years if he has less then one year on current deal, not sure). I just don’t think he takes it and I’m not giving Rondo max money. That’s why I think we need to trade him. Chances are Danny will hope Rondo has a good half season and raises his value and then trade him at trade deadline.
0
- Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 7:27pm #938871
CU.LIONSParticipantThis is not a good move. The Last thing Boston needs is another "needs the ball" dominate guard who does not excel at shooting. They already have Rondo and Smart for that. There is a reason why no one offered ET a contract. The Pacers just lost Lance and still didn’t offer ET a contract. Philly gave him away for nothing last season. Unless Ainge has some sort of trade coming, there is no need for ET. I would much rather have ET’s future minutes go to James Young. Chances are now that Young gets minimal backup minutes behind Boston’s 7 guard team.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 7:27pm #938739
CU.LIONSParticipantThis is not a good move. The Last thing Boston needs is another "needs the ball" dominate guard who does not excel at shooting. They already have Rondo and Smart for that. There is a reason why no one offered ET a contract. The Pacers just lost Lance and still didn’t offer ET a contract. Philly gave him away for nothing last season. Unless Ainge has some sort of trade coming, there is no need for ET. I would much rather have ET’s future minutes go to James Young. Chances are now that Young gets minimal backup minutes behind Boston’s 7 guard team.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 11:12pm #938757

kobyzParticipantI said it from the start, for him to succeed he have to play at pg position…
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2014 - 11:12pm #938889

kobyzParticipantI said it from the start, for him to succeed he have to play at pg position…
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 1:09am #938769
burgessfourParticipantAs a Philly fan I kept waiting for Turner to get a chance as a PG but it never really happened. It will
be interesting to see what Ainge has in mind for him, I really respect Ainge’s judgement.
0- Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 3:08am #938792
ballislyfe25ParticipantHe needs to be in a situation where he can play PG predominantly. At Ohio State, he was the main ballhandler and initiator of the offense and it led to him being the second overall pick. I didn’t watch much of him in Philadelphia, however, when he was given the chance to be the main ballhandler in Indiana, good things always seemed to happen. Better than when George Hill was asked to start the offense.
Turner has a high basketball IQ, good handles, and vision necessary to play the point in the NBA. He probably cannot do it full time, as he would struggle mightily trying to defend some of these world class athlete point guards, but he deserves the opportunity to be the main backup to Rondo on the Celtics, at least. I agree with burgessfour, I think Turner has not been properly used in the NBA, offensively at least. In the proper situation, he could be placed on a wing defensively and handle point guard duties offensively.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 3:08am #938923
ballislyfe25ParticipantHe needs to be in a situation where he can play PG predominantly. At Ohio State, he was the main ballhandler and initiator of the offense and it led to him being the second overall pick. I didn’t watch much of him in Philadelphia, however, when he was given the chance to be the main ballhandler in Indiana, good things always seemed to happen. Better than when George Hill was asked to start the offense.
Turner has a high basketball IQ, good handles, and vision necessary to play the point in the NBA. He probably cannot do it full time, as he would struggle mightily trying to defend some of these world class athlete point guards, but he deserves the opportunity to be the main backup to Rondo on the Celtics, at least. I agree with burgessfour, I think Turner has not been properly used in the NBA, offensively at least. In the proper situation, he could be placed on a wing defensively and handle point guard duties offensively.
0
- Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 1:09am #938901
burgessfourParticipantAs a Philly fan I kept waiting for Turner to get a chance as a PG but it never really happened. It will
be interesting to see what Ainge has in mind for him, I really respect Ainge’s judgement.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 4:11am #938807
barbabodomParticipantSo beside the shaky jump shot from Bradley, the Celtics will absolute not shoot from outside…
0- Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 6:03am #938823
capecodderParticipantGreen (if not traded) is a decent outside shooter…..Young may be also
I see Turner as a point 3
0- Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 9:11am #938859
barbabodomParticipantI forgot about Green. Either way, Boston top shooters will be Green, Olynik and maybe Young…It will be interesting to see the spacing
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 9:11am #938990
barbabodomParticipantI forgot about Green. Either way, Boston top shooters will be Green, Olynik and maybe Young…It will be interesting to see the spacing
0
- Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 6:03am #938955
capecodderParticipantGreen (if not traded) is a decent outside shooter…..Young may be also
I see Turner as a point 3
0
- Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 4:11am #938939
barbabodomParticipantSo beside the shaky jump shot from Bradley, the Celtics will absolute not shoot from outside…
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 6:18am #938829

HitsterParticipantTurner won’t do any point duties at the Celtics but it does give them another very ball handler and passer on the team. If Brad Stevens has very good passers at PG, SG and SF then it allows them to spread the floor and look for the best shooting opportunties which will make someone like Kelly Olynyk more effective.
Glad to see Evan get snapped up, I had thought a contender with a bit of cap space might have had a look at him given his good basketball IQ.
The irony is if he had played out the whole of last season in Philly even if Hinkie didn’t see him as a long term part of the squad then I reckon someone would have made him a good offer thinking they were getting a very good deal. Once he was traded he got labelled a volume shooter and almost a stats padder on a poor team who then ended up buried on a contender’s bench.
I always saw Turner as better than that and whilst he will be 26 soon and took time to get the starting gig at Philly, he was still considered a likely MIP contender on here just a couple of years ago. Hopefully he has a good run at Boston.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 6:18am #938961

HitsterParticipantTurner won’t do any point duties at the Celtics but it does give them another very ball handler and passer on the team. If Brad Stevens has very good passers at PG, SG and SF then it allows them to spread the floor and look for the best shooting opportunties which will make someone like Kelly Olynyk more effective.
Glad to see Evan get snapped up, I had thought a contender with a bit of cap space might have had a look at him given his good basketball IQ.
The irony is if he had played out the whole of last season in Philly even if Hinkie didn’t see him as a long term part of the squad then I reckon someone would have made him a good offer thinking they were getting a very good deal. Once he was traded he got labelled a volume shooter and almost a stats padder on a poor team who then ended up buried on a contender’s bench.
I always saw Turner as better than that and whilst he will be 26 soon and took time to get the starting gig at Philly, he was still considered a likely MIP contender on here just a couple of years ago. Hopefully he has a good run at Boston.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 7:31am #938847

alexcookParticipantIt’ll be interesting to see Turner fit within a Stevens offense. Whenever he got the ball for the Pacers last year, everyone cringed in the whole stadium. It was worse of a black hole than Granger, as Granger would at least spot up and shoot. Turner would try to drive to the whole, missing every opportunity to pass along the way. This is not Brad Stevens basketball.
I will give him Kudos for sticking up for Hibbert when Lance said some stuff at practice. He was a newer guy to our locker room and didn’t have to get involved, but stood up for his teammate. Minor thought, but goes a long way.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/22/2014 - 7:31am #938979

alexcookParticipantIt’ll be interesting to see Turner fit within a Stevens offense. Whenever he got the ball for the Pacers last year, everyone cringed in the whole stadium. It was worse of a black hole than Granger, as Granger would at least spot up and shoot. Turner would try to drive to the whole, missing every opportunity to pass along the way. This is not Brad Stevens basketball.
I will give him Kudos for sticking up for Hibbert when Lance said some stuff at practice. He was a newer guy to our locker room and didn’t have to get involved, but stood up for his teammate. Minor thought, but goes a long way.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 07/23/2014 - 2:23am #939129

HitsterParticipantWelcome to the forum AlexCook. Amusing thought that Big Roy Hibbert would need someone to stick up for him when he is 9 inches taller than Lance and outweighs him by about 50lbs #mismatch.
Good point by DWC above, Boston now have 18 players under contract so it occured to me if Danny Ainge did decide to trade Rondo then he’d probably need a 3rd team involved, look mainly for picks or the deal would involve a lot of players. My point is when a top player gets traded – more bodies go back the other way usually young pieces and guys to even up the salaries. Boston might end up receiving say 3 players back plus picks for Rondo, this then pushes their roster to maybe 20 so Ainge would need to waive players in due course and he would not want to waive the young trade pieces.
Hence he finds another team to take a player or two from Boston or tries to tag more players going back the other way with Rondo.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 07/23/2014 - 2:23am #938998

HitsterParticipantWelcome to the forum AlexCook. Amusing thought that Big Roy Hibbert would need someone to stick up for him when he is 9 inches taller than Lance and outweighs him by about 50lbs #mismatch.
Good point by DWC above, Boston now have 18 players under contract so it occured to me if Danny Ainge did decide to trade Rondo then he’d probably need a 3rd team involved, look mainly for picks or the deal would involve a lot of players. My point is when a top player gets traded – more bodies go back the other way usually young pieces and guys to even up the salaries. Boston might end up receiving say 3 players back plus picks for Rondo, this then pushes their roster to maybe 20 so Ainge would need to waive players in due course and he would not want to waive the young trade pieces.
Hence he finds another team to take a player or two from Boston or tries to tag more players going back the other way with Rondo.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 07/23/2014 - 7:12am #939078

BothTeamsPlayedHardParticipantThe 2014-15 Boston Celtics look a lot like the 2006-07 version, which is both good and bad. The first part of the bad is that they are poised to lose a lot. The good is that they have pieces that can allow them to buy hard (new era Garnett, Allen) if they so choose. Keith Bogans has a non-guaranteed deal. They are holding trade exceptions from Kris Humphies and Courtney Lee. Marcus Thornton, Joel Anthony, and Brandon Bass are expiring deals. With James Young, Marcus Smart, Jared Sullinger, Tyler Zeller, and Kelly Olynyk, they have rookie-scaled players that may intrigue other teams as well as a pair of picks next summer (the Clippers pick from the Doc Rivers trade) and the seeming lock that is the 31st pick because they have the Sixers pick. The second part of the bad is that if they do not buy hard, Rajon Rondo is also in his final year. Rajon Rondo, Avery Bradley, and Marcus Smart do not look like they fit together. If they sell off Rondo, then they head down the "whatif" path had they dealt Pierce in 2007.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 07/23/2014 - 7:12am #939209

BothTeamsPlayedHardParticipantThe 2014-15 Boston Celtics look a lot like the 2006-07 version, which is both good and bad. The first part of the bad is that they are poised to lose a lot. The good is that they have pieces that can allow them to buy hard (new era Garnett, Allen) if they so choose. Keith Bogans has a non-guaranteed deal. They are holding trade exceptions from Kris Humphies and Courtney Lee. Marcus Thornton, Joel Anthony, and Brandon Bass are expiring deals. With James Young, Marcus Smart, Jared Sullinger, Tyler Zeller, and Kelly Olynyk, they have rookie-scaled players that may intrigue other teams as well as a pair of picks next summer (the Clippers pick from the Doc Rivers trade) and the seeming lock that is the 31st pick because they have the Sixers pick. The second part of the bad is that if they do not buy hard, Rajon Rondo is also in his final year. Rajon Rondo, Avery Bradley, and Marcus Smart do not look like they fit together. If they sell off Rondo, then they head down the "whatif" path had they dealt Pierce in 2007.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |