This topic contains 14 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar apb540 12 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:44pm #56535
    AvatarAvatar
    LitteringAnd…
    Participant

    Haven’t been intensely negged in a while so here goes:

    CLEVELAND 
    Trade: Waiters, #1, Jack —————— Recieve: Favors, #5

    UTAH
    Trade: Favours, M. Williams, #5, #23 —– Recieve: Thad Young, #1, #32

    76ERS
    Trade: Thad Young, #32 —————— Recieve: Waiters, M. Williams, #23 

    Just expanding on previous ideas, I felt Utah trading Favors and #5 to Cavs for #1 wasn’t balanced. Just an idea; who says no do you think? 

    Surely Cavs take Favors as their big man and then BPA at 5, especially since Embiid is likely dropping now. If they still want him despite the injuries, or they want Wiggins or Parker this doesn’t go through. They can take Embiid at #5 maybe or one of Smart, Randle or Vonleh. 

    Jazz get thier man in Parker, lose Favors but are compensated with Thad Young to play PF as I think this team can’t afford another year in the lottery. 

    76ers are there to make it work but Young gets to leave after that nightmare of a season, they get a nice piece in Waiters as they’re light at the 2 spot. They trade one (or it could be two) of their second rounders to get another in the first. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

      

       

     

     

     

     

     

      

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:48pm #922480
    AvatarAvatar
    LitteringAnd…
    Participant

     I ballsed up, Jack goes to Utah as well. 

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:48pm #922607
    AvatarAvatar
    LitteringAnd…
    Participant

     I ballsed up, Jack goes to Utah as well. 

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:52pm #922482
    AvatarAvatar
    draftmangt
    Participant

     Terrible trade for the Cavs. #1 by its alone should be enough for 5+Favors and even then its not a good trade for the Cavs because theres nothing really available to them at 5, they have no need for Smart, Randle, or Vonleh.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:52pm #922609
    AvatarAvatar
    draftmangt
    Participant

     Terrible trade for the Cavs. #1 by its alone should be enough for 5+Favors and even then its not a good trade for the Cavs because theres nothing really available to them at 5, they have no need for Smart, Randle, or Vonleh.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:53pm #922484
    AvatarAvatar
    LitteringAnd…
    Participant

     Fair enough, you’re probably right now that I think about it. Do you think (assuming they keep it) they favour Parker or Wiggins, who is the better fit?   

    0
    • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 6:04pm #922488
      AvatarAvatar
      draftmangt
      Participant

      Unless they trade Waiters, Wiggins is absolutely the better fit. Irving and Waiters have struggle to play together, I don’t adding another ball dominant player in Parker would be a good idea. Plus Irving, Waiters, nor Parker are good perimeter defenders and currently the Cavs lack a rim protector

      0
    • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 6:04pm #922615
      AvatarAvatar
      draftmangt
      Participant

      Unless they trade Waiters, Wiggins is absolutely the better fit. Irving and Waiters have struggle to play together, I don’t adding another ball dominant player in Parker would be a good idea. Plus Irving, Waiters, nor Parker are good perimeter defenders and currently the Cavs lack a rim protector

      0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:53pm #922611
    AvatarAvatar
    LitteringAnd…
    Participant

     Fair enough, you’re probably right now that I think about it. Do you think (assuming they keep it) they favour Parker or Wiggins, who is the better fit?   

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:57pm #922486
    AvatarAvatar
    JCliff24
    Participant

    Dion Waiters has consistently improved in all aspects of the game. After the All-Star Break he was the Cavs leading scorer. So you’re asking for that guy, the number 1 pick in the strongest draft in years, and Jack for arguably Utah’s 4th best player and the #5 pick. 

    No.  

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 5:57pm #922613
    AvatarAvatar
    JCliff24
    Participant

    Dion Waiters has consistently improved in all aspects of the game. After the All-Star Break he was the Cavs leading scorer. So you’re asking for that guy, the number 1 pick in the strongest draft in years, and Jack for arguably Utah’s 4th best player and the #5 pick. 

    No.  

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 6:50pm #922631
    AvatarAvatar
    AwrightAwrightAwright
    Participant

     You can keep waiters.  We do NOT want him !  

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/19/2014 - 6:50pm #922503
    AvatarAvatar
    AwrightAwrightAwright
    Participant

     You can keep waiters.  We do NOT want him !  

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 06/20/2014 - 3:38am #922717
    AvatarAvatar
    apb540
    Participant

    Sam Hinkie wouldn’t do this trade after 16 tequila shots

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 06/20/2014 - 3:38am #922590
    AvatarAvatar
    apb540
    Participant

    Sam Hinkie wouldn’t do this trade after 16 tequila shots

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login