This topic contains 12 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by tidho 12 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sat, 06/14/2014 - 2:42pm #56345
treytalkssports.comParticipantThe Cavs are in an intersting position with the number one overall pick. With Kevin Love and Carmelo Anthony available, would you rather keep the number one pick (Wiggins, Parker, or Embiid) or get Kevin Love or Carmelo Anthony.
I would personally rather have Kevin Love than the number one pick, even in this year’s loaded draft class. There is just something to be said about a proven commodity.
What would you rather have and why?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/14/2014 - 3:00pm #919121

The Scare Crow RisesParticipantI would want Kevin Love over any prospect in this draft not named Joel, Jabarri or Andrew…
Meaning I would absolutely trade any pick after 4 for Kevin Love and not even look back, but you can’t pass on The Big 3 of Embiid, Parker and Wiggins
So I agree I would rather have a proven All NBA player instead of a rookie anyday but not If that Rookie could be a Top 5 player at his position in the future, Love is older and more expensive, so there are other factors to gage when bringing up this debate…
Would you rather pay 5-7 million per season over the next 4 years for Embiid, Parker, Wiggins or pay 15-20 million for Love over the same period of time…
For some teams it would be worth it 100%, but for others it’s not that simple…
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/14/2014 - 3:00pm #918989

The Scare Crow RisesParticipantI would want Kevin Love over any prospect in this draft not named Joel, Jabarri or Andrew…
Meaning I would absolutely trade any pick after 4 for Kevin Love and not even look back, but you can’t pass on The Big 3 of Embiid, Parker and Wiggins
So I agree I would rather have a proven All NBA player instead of a rookie anyday but not If that Rookie could be a Top 5 player at his position in the future, Love is older and more expensive, so there are other factors to gage when bringing up this debate…
Would you rather pay 5-7 million per season over the next 4 years for Embiid, Parker, Wiggins or pay 15-20 million for Love over the same period of time…
For some teams it would be worth it 100%, but for others it’s not that simple…
0- Posted on: Sat, 06/14/2014 - 3:15pm #919127
treytalkssports.comParticipantIn your mind, which teams would it be worth it for and which teams wouldn’t it be?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/14/2014 - 3:15pm #918995
treytalkssports.comParticipantIn your mind, which teams would it be worth it for and which teams wouldn’t it be?
0
- Posted on: Sat, 06/14/2014 - 4:57pm #919167

BogDon_KryptParticipantI’d rather have Kevin love than anthony Bennet and Matt bonner
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/14/2014 - 4:57pm #919035

BogDon_KryptParticipantI’d rather have Kevin love than anthony Bennet and Matt bonner
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/15/2014 - 12:17am #919333

r377ParticipantI think draft picks can sometimes be overrated. Its all based on "potential" where as you are trading for a proven NBA player (you know his style of play at this level. His injury concerns/pros/cons etc). Lots of players do not live up to their "draft hype" where as there are fewer players that exceed draft day expectations.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/15/2014 - 12:17am #919202

r377ParticipantI think draft picks can sometimes be overrated. Its all based on "potential" where as you are trading for a proven NBA player (you know his style of play at this level. His injury concerns/pros/cons etc). Lots of players do not live up to their "draft hype" where as there are fewer players that exceed draft day expectations.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/15/2014 - 2:02am #919337
BallinmvpParticipantWell a lot of teams such as the Bucks, T Wolves, Utah, etc don’t have the luxury of signing elite free agents. Either due to market or lack of Appeal in the losing, living environment, etc. it’s important for those teams to draft elite talent, develop it, and sign it long term. Like a previous poster said, it all depends on the team. LA and Bos are bad now but have a long tradition of winning and they are great places to live and do things when your not playing ball, they have the option to trade their picks for key vets if they feel so. Jazz, Bucks, and Etc need toget young pieces to build around
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/15/2014 - 2:02am #919206
BallinmvpParticipantWell a lot of teams such as the Bucks, T Wolves, Utah, etc don’t have the luxury of signing elite free agents. Either due to market or lack of Appeal in the losing, living environment, etc. it’s important for those teams to draft elite talent, develop it, and sign it long term. Like a previous poster said, it all depends on the team. LA and Bos are bad now but have a long tradition of winning and they are great places to live and do things when your not playing ball, they have the option to trade their picks for key vets if they feel so. Jazz, Bucks, and Etc need toget young pieces to build around
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/15/2014 - 9:52am #919424
tidhoParticipantMelo has an ETO. If there was mutual interest, he’s just sign with Cleveland.
Love is a free agent next year, unless he’s signing long term as part of the deal then there is no way Cleveland should risk dealing the #1 pick. Quite frankly Minny has no leverage in this situation, Cleveland shouldn’t have to deal the #1 for Love.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/15/2014 - 9:52am #919294
tidhoParticipantMelo has an ETO. If there was mutual interest, he’s just sign with Cleveland.
Love is a free agent next year, unless he’s signing long term as part of the deal then there is no way Cleveland should risk dealing the #1 pick. Quite frankly Minny has no leverage in this situation, Cleveland shouldn’t have to deal the #1 for Love.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |