This topic contains 24 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar he_gets_buckets 12 years, 2 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #54749
    AvatarAvatar
    morestealsthanscores
    Participant

     Before I get someone jumping on me about this- i’m not talking about ‘which is better’ ‘which has the better teams’ ‘who would win in a match for $10m’…none of that.

    Just something I find quite interesting is the way that going pro can impact a player’s development vs going to college. There’s solid arguments for both.

    Exhibit 1- Ricky Rubio. We all know where he’s at now. But does anyone remember what he was like at U16 level? He was unreal. Quadruple double in the Euro U16s semi final, and in the Euro U16 Final, he hit 50 points, a triple double, 8 steals, and a half court buzzer beater to send it to overtime. The kid was unreal. And for the record- he could flat out score.

    What happened? He went pro- and went pro crazily young. From the age of 14 til the age of 18, he was the 5th option on the floor. He deferred to more experienced teammates consistently. Now, a few years on, it really seems like this hampered his development to score in adult basketball. Now, in adult basketball, he’s practically the same player as he was when he was 18. If he’d have gone to college, it would have been ‘his team’. He would’ve had the minutes and the authority to learn to create shots; he would’ve had a chance to work on the aspects of his game holding him back.

    Exhibit 2- Joel Freeland. Now, you’re probably thinking ‘who the hell cares?!?’ but I found this one really interesting, as being from England, I saw a lot of Joel playing when he was younger. His game was totally different- he was a quick, face up stretch 4, who was happy to step out to the FIBA 3 point line. 

    What happened? He went pro in Spain- and being 6’11, they turned him into a stereotypical pick and roll back to the basket centre. He dominated the Spanish league doing so- fair enough. But when he came to the NBA and suddenly didn’t have any sort of physical advantage, he really, really struggled. It’s only through hard work this offseason he even has a role at all. If he’d have gone to college? He wouldn’t have ‘automatically’ had the phsyical advantage, and would hopefully have continued to find new ways to score. He could’ve developed as a player far more, becoming far more the face up player that he used to be.

    Is going pro over college really the best way to develop? It’s advocates love the fact it teaches players maturity, professionalism, etc…but in terms of minutes and skills development, players don’t seem to get the oppurtunity to succeed. thoughts?

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #886868
    AvatarAvatar
    Grandmama
    Participant

     I say college for the simple fact they will play more.  If I remember correctly, Brandon Jennings barely got minutes overseas.  He would have played 30+ mpg in college.  Plus, they can start working on a degree if basketball doesn’t work out for their future.

    0
  • #886759
    AvatarAvatar
    Grandmama
    Participant

     I say college for the simple fact they will play more.  If I remember correctly, Brandon Jennings barely got minutes overseas.  He would have played 30+ mpg in college.  Plus, they can start working on a degree if basketball doesn’t work out for their future.

    0
  • #886870
    AvatarAvatar
    Rip255

    They should come to Australia. Our season runs at the same time as NCAA, but it is our Summer and your Winter (Huge bonus). They’d get paid about $150,000 for 6 months work. They’ll get plenty of minutes and a chance to showcase their skills on television so scouts can watch. 

    The quality of the compeition is quite good and the crowds in my city are around 11,000 each game. 

    To prove the league is no joke, the following players are examples of "imports". 

    Sam Young – Averaged 6 points in 16 minutes over 5 years in the NBA. 

    James Ennis – NCAA All American who was drafted in the second round by the Heat in 2013. They sent him down here as they don’t really need a SF right now. 

    So while a top 50 prospect would be a good player, they wouldn’t be league MVP when they are 19 years old but could expect to start. 

    Plus they’d get mad love from the local girls and are allowed to drink cos the legal age is only 18. Hell if they want they can even go to college bars on campus to get the experience. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0
  • #886761
    AvatarAvatar
    Rip255

    They should come to Australia. Our season runs at the same time as NCAA, but it is our Summer and your Winter (Huge bonus). They’d get paid about $150,000 for 6 months work. They’ll get plenty of minutes and a chance to showcase their skills on television so scouts can watch. 

    The quality of the compeition is quite good and the crowds in my city are around 11,000 each game. 

    To prove the league is no joke, the following players are examples of "imports". 

    Sam Young – Averaged 6 points in 16 minutes over 5 years in the NBA. 

    James Ennis – NCAA All American who was drafted in the second round by the Heat in 2013. They sent him down here as they don’t really need a SF right now. 

    So while a top 50 prospect would be a good player, they wouldn’t be league MVP when they are 19 years old but could expect to start. 

    Plus they’d get mad love from the local girls and are allowed to drink cos the legal age is only 18. Hell if they want they can even go to college bars on campus to get the experience. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0
    • #886876
      AvatarAvatar
      Rip255

      Furthermore Brandon Jennings had an ego problem when he was 18. I don’t blame him for taking the money, but he went to one of the top clubs in Europe so it’s no surprise that he didn’t get minutes.  He was going up against the best point guards not in the NBA. These guys are no joke and earn 2-3m a season.

      He basically sacrificed all development opportunities for the cash, and I don’t think his game ever recovered. Should have at least gone to a club where he’d be in the rotation. 

      0
    • #886767
      AvatarAvatar
      Rip255

      Furthermore Brandon Jennings had an ego problem when he was 18. I don’t blame him for taking the money, but he went to one of the top clubs in Europe so it’s no surprise that he didn’t get minutes.  He was going up against the best point guards not in the NBA. These guys are no joke and earn 2-3m a season.

      He basically sacrificed all development opportunities for the cash, and I don’t think his game ever recovered. Should have at least gone to a club where he’d be in the rotation. 

      0
  • #886880
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

     Joel Freeland declared for the 2006 draft and was selected 30th by Kevin Pritchard and the Trailblazers. He was encouraged to stay in Europe and develop before finally coming over to the US in 2012. If he had gone to College in the US and stayed for a couple off years, he would have surely gone higher in a subsequent draft.

    But as he had been playing professionally in the UK and then Europe, he would have had to have made a switch to the US back in about 2005 and he may well have had eligibility issues with the NCAA having played professionally already.

    It was a pity that Portland did not bring him over earlier than 2012 as he was 25 by then but he had made useful money in Europe and got a $9 million plus 3 year deal from Portland, so financially his career hasn’t worked out badly. But he is still playing catch in in the NBA at 27 years old and to be fair has had much more playing time this season than last..

     

     

    0
  • #886771
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

     Joel Freeland declared for the 2006 draft and was selected 30th by Kevin Pritchard and the Trailblazers. He was encouraged to stay in Europe and develop before finally coming over to the US in 2012. If he had gone to College in the US and stayed for a couple off years, he would have surely gone higher in a subsequent draft.

    But as he had been playing professionally in the UK and then Europe, he would have had to have made a switch to the US back in about 2005 and he may well have had eligibility issues with the NCAA having played professionally already.

    It was a pity that Portland did not bring him over earlier than 2012 as he was 25 by then but he had made useful money in Europe and got a $9 million plus 3 year deal from Portland, so financially his career hasn’t worked out badly. But he is still playing catch in in the NBA at 27 years old and to be fair has had much more playing time this season than last..

     

     

    0
  • #886785
    AvatarAvatar
    King Calucha
    Participant

    "Just something I find quite interesting is the way that going pro can impact a player’s development vs going to college. There’s solid arguments for both"

    I’m sorry. Two examples are not solid enough.

    0
  • #886894
    AvatarAvatar
    King Calucha
    Participant

    "Just something I find quite interesting is the way that going pro can impact a player’s development vs going to college. There’s solid arguments for both"

    I’m sorry. Two examples are not solid enough.

    0
  • #886831
    AvatarAvatar
    morestealsthanscores
    Participant

    valid point, but not really easy to go into detail about loads of players. but think about the ones that came over early- ibaka, nowitski, deng…

    0
  • #886940
    AvatarAvatar
    morestealsthanscores
    Participant

    valid point, but not really easy to go into detail about loads of players. but think about the ones that came over early- ibaka, nowitski, deng…

    0
  • #886839
    AvatarAvatar
    JoeWolf1

     

    As far as American guys…It’s tough to say because there hasn’t been a large enough sample size that have tried their luck in Europe. Jennings, and Tyler are both in the NBA, but Jeremy clearly wasn’t ready for what happened to him in his first pro season, and he did rebound and play much better in Japan. 

    For years, I’ve been wanting USA basketball to step up and have an official training facility, similar to the Olypmic facility in Colorado, so young basketball players can practice, train, learn and compete against NBAers,  the high school elite, and NCAA players during their off-seasons, while protecting their amateur status. I think it’d be a great investment in developing American basketball, while giving kids unsure about turing pro a safe oppoturnity to really test with waters. I think it would help USA basketball going forward, preserve NCAA hoops, and give kids that choose to goto school, a great oppoturnity to advance their skills in a safe enviornment where they know they’re not going to be suspended or thrown under the bus by the NCAA. I’m also against paying NCAA players, on a school to school basis, but much like Olympic athletes, they could get endorsements, and have benefits like that through this kind of structure.

    0
  • #886948
    AvatarAvatar
    JoeWolf1

     

    As far as American guys…It’s tough to say because there hasn’t been a large enough sample size that have tried their luck in Europe. Jennings, and Tyler are both in the NBA, but Jeremy clearly wasn’t ready for what happened to him in his first pro season, and he did rebound and play much better in Japan. 

    For years, I’ve been wanting USA basketball to step up and have an official training facility, similar to the Olypmic facility in Colorado, so young basketball players can practice, train, learn and compete against NBAers,  the high school elite, and NCAA players during their off-seasons, while protecting their amateur status. I think it’d be a great investment in developing American basketball, while giving kids unsure about turing pro a safe oppoturnity to really test with waters. I think it would help USA basketball going forward, preserve NCAA hoops, and give kids that choose to goto school, a great oppoturnity to advance their skills in a safe enviornment where they know they’re not going to be suspended or thrown under the bus by the NCAA. I’m also against paying NCAA players, on a school to school basis, but much like Olympic athletes, they could get endorsements, and have benefits like that through this kind of structure.

    0
  • #886841
    AvatarAvatar
    Jester87
    Participant

    Honestly what Rubio did at 14 in U16 competitions is not that relevant. Most of the players in those games are bad and end up never playing ball professionally, so the competition is too soft. Also some guys peak earlier, so it doesn’t really matter. I think players in Europe develop better on some aspects of the game (like help defense, spacings, positioning on the court) that most players in the US learn only after a few years in college and most of the times only when they go to the Nba. And I think Europe gives better chances for development (at least in the best leagues, obviously it’s not the same if you’re playing in, say, Bulgaria), because players can practice whenever they want with professional coaches, there are no rules forbidding to practice any longer than a given number of hours and they don’t have to think about anything else (like going to classes or pretendinge they’re attending classes) except for basketball. Also they play against better competition and with better teammates, so they have a chance to learn from more experienced teammates. Of course the playing time is not the same, so it depends on what part of the game a prospect has to improve in. Also, going to Europe is not that useful if one does it the way Brandon Jennings did, because a team is not going to care much about developing a player who will leave after the end of the season.

    0
  • #886950
    AvatarAvatar
    Jester87
    Participant

    Honestly what Rubio did at 14 in U16 competitions is not that relevant. Most of the players in those games are bad and end up never playing ball professionally, so the competition is too soft. Also some guys peak earlier, so it doesn’t really matter. I think players in Europe develop better on some aspects of the game (like help defense, spacings, positioning on the court) that most players in the US learn only after a few years in college and most of the times only when they go to the Nba. And I think Europe gives better chances for development (at least in the best leagues, obviously it’s not the same if you’re playing in, say, Bulgaria), because players can practice whenever they want with professional coaches, there are no rules forbidding to practice any longer than a given number of hours and they don’t have to think about anything else (like going to classes or pretendinge they’re attending classes) except for basketball. Also they play against better competition and with better teammates, so they have a chance to learn from more experienced teammates. Of course the playing time is not the same, so it depends on what part of the game a prospect has to improve in. Also, going to Europe is not that useful if one does it the way Brandon Jennings did, because a team is not going to care much about developing a player who will leave after the end of the season.

    0
  • #888370
    AvatarAvatar
    European Basketballer
    Participant

    As usual, lots and lots of myths and falsehoods being spread by NBA only fans here.

     

    1. Freeland did NOT "dominate" in the Spanish League. He was a good center on a mediocre team. Nothing more than that. He was not even remotely close to ever resembling anything being "dominant".

    2. Jennings did NOT play on "one of the best teams in Europe". He played on a very mediocre Italian Euroleague team.

    3. Jennings did NOT "barely get any minutes of playing time in Europe". He played just about the normal amount of minutes that most veteran main rotation players play. Or what might be called "starters minutes" in NBA lingo.

    Every single time the subject of European basketball comes up in this forum, NBA only fans just start throwing around a bunch of myths and falsehoods.

    0
    • #888400
      AvatarAvatar
      Grandmama
      Participant

       Played 17 mpg vs the 30+ mpg he would have played in college.  Rationalize it however you’d like.  Please explain why you still post here when you hate the site?  Just doesn’t make sense to me.

      0
      • #888404
        AvatarAvatar
        European Basketballer
        Participant

        He played 18-19 minutes, not 17, depending on the competition (Euroleague/Italian League). That’s normal main rotation minutes in Europe. Since that’s set at 20 minutes per game on average. That would be the same as a 35-36 minutes per game for a "starter" in the NBA.

        They don’t have "starters" and all that heirachy BS in Europe anyway. That’s just an American thing.

        I am not "rationalizing" anything. I am correcting BS that is being posted here. People post made up fictional BS here all the time whenever the subject of European basketball comes up. It’s always a fictional made up nonsense. I am correcting it.

        Then people get all ticked off about it when their made up stuff gets pointed out and corrected.

        So why are you posting here? Is it to just make up nonsense about the game in Europe? Does not make sense to me.

        I don’t hate the site. You just claimed that I hate it.

        0
        • #893220
          AvatarAvatar
          he_gets_buckets
          Participant

          "Heirarchy BS"

          So playing your best players the most is just ignorant fat american pig idea?! GOD DAMN MONGORIANS

           

          0
        • #893108
          AvatarAvatar
          he_gets_buckets
          Participant

          "Heirarchy BS"

          So playing your best players the most is just ignorant fat american pig idea?! GOD DAMN MONGORIANS

           

          0
      • #888515
        AvatarAvatar
        European Basketballer
        Participant

        He played 18-19 minutes, not 17, depending on the competition (Euroleague/Italian League). That’s normal main rotation minutes in Europe. Since that’s set at 20 minutes per game on average. That would be the same as a 35-36 minutes per game for a "starter" in the NBA.

        They don’t have "starters" and all that heirachy BS in Europe anyway. That’s just an American thing.

        I am not "rationalizing" anything. I am correcting BS that is being posted here. People post made up fictional BS here all the time whenever the subject of European basketball comes up. It’s always a fictional made up nonsense. I am correcting it.

        Then people get all ticked off about it when their made up stuff gets pointed out and corrected.

        So why are you posting here? Is it to just make up nonsense about the game in Europe? Does not make sense to me.

        I don’t hate the site. You just claimed that I hate it.

        0
    • #888510
      AvatarAvatar
      Grandmama
      Participant

       Played 17 mpg vs the 30+ mpg he would have played in college.  Rationalize it however you’d like.  Please explain why you still post here when you hate the site?  Just doesn’t make sense to me.

      0
  • #888481
    AvatarAvatar
    European Basketballer
    Participant

    As usual, lots and lots of myths and falsehoods being spread by NBA only fans here.

     

    1. Freeland did NOT "dominate" in the Spanish League. He was a good center on a mediocre team. Nothing more than that. He was not even remotely close to ever resembling anything being "dominant".

    2. Jennings did NOT play on "one of the best teams in Europe". He played on a very mediocre Italian Euroleague team.

    3. Jennings did NOT "barely get any minutes of playing time in Europe". He played just about the normal amount of minutes that most veteran main rotation players play. Or what might be called "starters minutes" in NBA lingo.

    Every single time the subject of European basketball comes up in this forum, NBA only fans just start throwing around a bunch of myths and falsehoods.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login