This topic contains 19 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Yankeep12 17 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 8:28am #5015
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    http://www.nbadraft.net/nba_mock_drafts/comments/20142

    comment

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 8:46am #163865
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    dont pay attention to the 2nd rd

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 8:53am #163878
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    good mock, Check out Mock Draft 5.0

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 9:13am #163910
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    nice mock knicksboy but johnson doesn’t go to toronto they get derozan or clark

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 9:27am #163932
    AvatarAvatar
    gedrosolan
    Participant

    although i don’t really see the grizzlies wanting harden since they already have mayo. but as a kings fan, i would do that trade.

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 9:42am #163946
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    Harden would be the perfect 6th man for the grizz

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:03am #163962
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    Grizz fan answer me this

    Why would Sacramento give up a 2010 pick, Darrel Arthur and James Harden for Rubio and a 2010 pick?

    I mean, If I was Sacramento, I would do anything but a pick swap (2 for 4) because Rubio Does Not Wanna Play In Memphis…

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:19am #163981
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    Darrell Arthur is on the grizzlies genius
    the trade is

    Memphis sends Arthur, + Rubio
    Sacramento sends Harden + 2010 1st rd pick (top 3 protected)

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:21am #163984
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    my bad…

    but still, 2010 is looking like a all-time draft, why should I give up a 2010 pick for Rubio when I could add a Holiday, Curry, Jennings or even a Flynn and probably get the same numbers?

    I dont think a Memphis-Sacramento deal will happen.

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:27am #163985
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    the grizz might have to throw in darko’s expiring for a bad contract from sacramento

    it might work because look at it this way
    if arthur was in this draft where would he go?probably top 10
    if rubio was in next years draft where would he go? probably top 6

    so in my eyes its a bit in memphis’s favour but if you do darko for bad contract it evens out very well

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:35am #163998
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    No way. If I’m Sacramento, why would I give up the 2010 pick?

    were gonna be bad, again in 2010. keep it. Take Holiday (4th), Daye (23rd) and Claver (31st)

    Darko? I dont want him. And, Arthur would not go top 10 in this draft…too many good PG and not alot of teams need a 3/4

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:38am #164003
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    Darko is as good as gold now he has a 7million dollar expiring contract going into a year being said to be the best FA class ever, sacramento can shed some bad contracts while getting darko a huge trading asset

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:41am #164006
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    uhhh. no not for a 2010 pick and a shot at John Wall, Cousins, Favors, Henry and Aldrich….doesnt make sense

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:44am #164012
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    it is top 3 protected which means if the ping pong balls bounce in sacramentos favour they keep the pick until next year

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:45am #164015
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    yea but there are many good players in 2010 draft…not just 3.

    I think that if you took out the 2010 pick, that trade becomes more realistic.

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:47am #164016
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    yeah but then the grizz are trading down for nothing

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:50am #164017
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    Well this deal would sound more realistic

    Memphis-Rubio, Darko and Arthur
    Sacramento- Hill, Udrih and Greene

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 10:50am #164018
    AvatarAvatar
    grizz_fan7
    Participant

    that trade is horrible for the grizz

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 11:21am #164064
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    Well, I think the Rubio hype is dying. I wouldnt give up alot for him. He will have a huge learning curve from Euro to NBA and Sacramento can take a PG at 4.

    If Sacramento doesnt want Rubio and fall in love with another PG, Memphis might as well not take Rubio,

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 06/14/2009 - 12:25pm #164132
    AvatarAvatar
    Yankeep12
    Participant

    sacramento and memphis have already had discussions. sacramento won’t be getting the number 2 pick without giving up jason thompson, and that is something that they aren’t going to do.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login