This topic contains 5 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Ny2daDeathOFme 13 years, 9 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #43307
    AvatarAvatar
    trelisa
    Participant

    Paul Pierce for Gallinari+Mozgov

    why for denver: they are kind of in a win now mode, and they desperately need a go to guy in the clutch.

    why for celtics: Gallinari fits with Rondo better as he is a very good in the full court, also gives them a good big in Mozgov.

    0
  • #714522
    AvatarAvatar
    TomShoe
    Participant

     Why would Denver need another SF when they have Andre Iguodala? He’s already a great defender and a do-it-all type of player. Heck, you could make a case that he’s the 3rd best SF in the league.

    Paul Pierce isn’t leaving Boston. There would be riots in Boston if someone even suggested the idea of trading PP. Celtics are fine as they’ve already gotten younger with Avery Bradley instead of Ray, and the rookies.

    0
  • #714534
    AvatarAvatar
    For_Never_Ever
    Participant

     Jeff Green has kinda a similar game and size as Gallinari. That wouldn’t work. I’m looking foward to Jeff playing this year. They must like Jeff giving him a contract for four years, even though he was out for the whole last season.

    0
  • #714538
    AvatarAvatar
    TRC1991
    Participant

    Pierce doesn’t fit in Denver at all… they’re young and they like to have young athletes who can run, he’d slow their tempo down a lot… plus he’s Paul Pierce, he brought the first NBA title back to Boston in 23 seasons, nobody wants him outta town.

    0
  • #714542
    AvatarAvatar
    blood

     posting these stupid trade ideas…no offense to anybody but cmon now

    0
  • #714543
    AvatarAvatar
    Ny2daDeathOFme
    Participant

     like everyone else said this is a bad trade on many levels bro. 

    1. the nuggets arent actually in "win mode" they’re probobly the youngest team in the league (with alot of upside)

    2. The nuggets upgraded this off season already by adding A.I so i dont see a need for PP

    3. And lastly why would you give a player that has so much more room to grow for a player that most likely has one more contract in him before retiring and thats if he doesnt retire before that.

     

    So you def deserve these negs.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login