what if the clipps get nothing?

This topic contains 18 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by Clippers Darrell 17 years, 1 month ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 7:52am #4066

praimal
Participant
i dont read todays posts so mabye someone has the same stupid idea,but hey!thanks im not GM.
the problem whit the L.A.C. its that if they pick griffin or rubio it´s going to be hard build around he with those big contracts.then why not trade those contracts with the pick?.for example
pick griffin and send it to memphis with baron davis for the 2 and the 27 pick,next years memphis draft pick and haddadi.memphis fits the pf and the pg position and clippers gets 2 draft this year,one posibly lotery next year and a low cost 7-footer “maybe”.
then you send rubio to sacramento with randolph.and get 4,23 and next years pick(maybe ask for garcia it´s too much).
now start to work. you pick 3 first round players.it´s a soft draft but you can expect that at least one of them become a real baketball player,then you pick some europen prospect in second round(you dont need to sing him rigth now). next year you´ve got 2 or 3 lottery picks to pick a franchise player(wall?) and work some trades with the salary cap you made this year.
memphis probably say yes cause worst case scenario if baron dont play like he use to they still having conely.the problem with that team(baron-conely,oj,gay,griffin,gasol)it´s that they´re going to need 3 balls.
sacramento trade it´s harder but they got the point gard they want,still having money to spend and next summer they got randolph expiring contract to work trades.
and it´s hard for both to make a superstar F.A. next summer.
the clipps have two problems
have someone to fired in february when griffin and rubio was figthing for the R.O.Y.and giving free tickets if they want someone in the staples.
has i said thanks im not G.M.they keep griffin and try to work a trade on baron.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 9:52am #152292

d-grizzly
Participant
it’d be kinda hard for them to get nothing out of this draft. they’ll draft griffin and trade him off with one of their heavy contracts, it’s the only way he’s gonna go anywhere.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 10:18am #152304

Mr. Basketball
Participant
NO!!!!!!!!! stupid post.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 4:17pm #152395

tli232
Not only is Randolph a malignant cancerous tumour, his massive contract makes it next to impossible to trade him. Getting nothing back in return from that hypothetical Kings trade will be impossible as there are no $s coming back.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 4:18pm #152397

Pringles
Participant
I’m so glad Walsh moved Randolph when he did.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 4:46pm #152410

butidonthavemoney
If your team has any bad contracts just call up Donald Sterling. He will take them off your hands.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 5:03pm #152423

Stanford hoops
Participant
you have to have the nearly the same money comming back..so you cant trade the pick and baron for more picks and haddi or whatever his name is because the contracts are way to lopsided
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 5:39pm #152432

butidonthavemoney
If the team you are trading to has cap space, OKC and Memphis do, then the contracts don’t have to match.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 6:29pm #152447

evan13
Participant
That would be very interesting but it is very unrealistic and the money would probably not work out
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 6:29pm #152448

evan13
Participant
That would be very interesting but it is very unrealistic and the money would probably not work out
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 6:45pm #152454

joecheck88
Participant
The clippers need to ride out the bad contracts they have, trade one or 2 of them, and while they are waiting play the young guys and sit the other guys. Just do what the Knicks did to Marbury, tell Randolph to go away. You have to pay him but atleast griffin wont be subjected to that moron.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 7:58pm #152463

praimal
Participant
when i said “gets nothing” i mean takin hill,harden or jennings looks like nothing to me if you can pick griffin.
on the money issue.of course it can work with memphis,i mean they are over 34m in salaries next year.they can take baron or zack contract and not mach it.with the kings its harder.even with garcia on the trade im not sure if they can make it but i think they can,and you have abdur-rahim contract its 6 or 7 millions and it´s in his last year,so the you can get it done.anyway,it´s very unrealistic and risk,but not necesarly a bad move
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 8:07pm #152464

Mr. Basketball
Participant
NO!
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 8:27pm #152466

Stanford hoops
Participant
why would you pay zach to stay away..he is very very productive..no one pays a 20 and 10 guy to stay away
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 8:29pm #152467

Mr. Basketball
Participant
he is a team cancer. people would pay for a cancer medication. clips might pay for zach to stay away. jk on the comparison btw.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 8:37pm #152469

Stanford hoops
Participant
they already made it known that they are gonna play zack and in some cases try blake at the 5 with zack on the floor at the 4 (draftexpress.com)..for a clippers fan you sure dont know much about whats going on with the team
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/22/2009 - 8:52pm #152471

Mr. Basketball
Participant
it was a joke as i said in the post… however, the clips r trying to get rid of randolph even tho they are not saying that.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/23/2009 - 6:23am #152505

Jackyboy6
Participant
I think that the Clippers will keep Blake Griffin when they draft him and they will try to build a franchise around him. Even though he hasnt played yet, Blake Griffin has great potential and I see him as a great rebounder and scorer for his entire career.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/23/2009 - 9:03am #152535

Clippers Darrell
Participant
Lets Go Clippers Lets Go !!!!!
0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.