This topic contains 9 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar KHAM83 11 years, 10 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 3:42pm #40635
    AvatarAvatar
    drk3351
    Participant

     Assuming neither Barnes or MKG is availible  at #7, this can be a trade idea for the warriors and minnesota. 

    Warriors get the 18th pick and beasly

    Wolves get the 7th pick and the bad contact of richard jefferson

    for the warriors they can draft perry jones or moe harkless and try to fill the small foward position while getting beasly and getting rid of jefferson. And the wolves can get their choice of shooting guards at 7th probably lamb, waiters, or rivers. Thoughts?

     

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 3:44pm #685488
    AvatarAvatar
    Tyrober
    Participant

     Bad trade for the Warriors. Wolves would jump all over this.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 3:49pm #685491
    AvatarAvatar
    DolanCare
    Participant

     I wouldnt call it a horrible trade. But still, the Warriors do not need Beasley. The last thing they need is another tweener who doesn’t win games….. but they could end up drafting T Jones. Gulp.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 4:12pm #685511
    AvatarAvatar
    Chewy
    Participant

    Tanked more games this year then every non playoff NFL team combined. Don’t blame the losing of those poor tweeners.

    Richard Jefferson, Dorell Wright, Dominic McGuire, and Chris Wright? They need help at the 3 and Beasely could help them.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 4:16pm #685516
    AvatarAvatar
    HeelsGuy25
    Participant

     trade. No way GS dies this. They are the team Im most interested too see on draft night.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 4:23pm #685528
    AvatarAvatar
    Chewy
    Participant

    Beasely is a restricted free agent, so sign and trade is possible.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 4:24pm #685517
    AvatarAvatar
    220
    Participant

    Isn’t Beasley a free agent?

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 4:26pm #685529
    AvatarAvatar
    drk3351
    Participant

     well maybe instead of beasly the wolves 2013 first round pick top 12 protected

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 4:31pm #685527
    AvatarAvatar
    PulseGlazer
    Participant

    Beasley is a RFA and can’t be traded.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 4:39pm #685540
    AvatarAvatar
    KHAM83
    Participant

    Wolves were contending for a playoff spot before Rubio’s injury. I dont think Warriors will send their lotto pick for theirs.
    Beasley is better than any 3 on the Warriors, and any that they can get outside of Barnes and MKG. I think they rather more of a defensive SF like Iggy or Gay though. I think Philly will be m ore willing to move Iggy for the Warriors pick to get a SG. Only way I can see a Wolves-Warriors deal is say Harkless or either Jones fall to the Wolves at 18, the Wolves may entice the Warriors to swap picks if the Wolves send next years pick and agrees to take Biedrens contract off their hands. Theyll have to sign and trade Beasely of course. Warriors now have Beasely as 3 and a prospect at the 3, Ill suggest Harkless bc of his defense. They can then Admesty Jefferson’s deal. Wolves can get a 2g, Rivers/Lamb/Waiters and get Beidrens to add devensive depth at the 5. Give Beidrens time to see if he can stay healthy and rediscover his skills. If not, admesty him.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login