This topic contains 16 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar llperez 14 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #40386
    AvatarAvatar
    mookie
    Participant

     Tell me micheal wilbon isn’t the biggest a$$-kisser alive!  How he bends over for magic, and just listening to him ask stern about the lottery set up.  I don’t like Rome but at least he don’t try to sugar coat a question like wilbon

    0
  • #682906
    AvatarAvatar
    TRC1991
    Participant

    wilbon would suck the AIDS out of magic if he could

    0
  • #682907
    AvatarAvatar
    jhbm24
    Participant

     He’s gettin paid to sugar coat it. It’s ABC!!!! 

    0
  • #682908
    AvatarAvatar
    ballaj334
    Participant

     i think its beyond obvious he does not like stern so the suck up thing i dont really understand magic on the other hand………….. i pretty sure wolbon is in love he even calls him ervin like its his boy ahah

    0
  • #682909
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    stern mentioned during the interview at halftime with wilbom in regards to the lotto fixing of the 1985 draft that espn the mag did a article about it disproving the theories behind it. But I wanted to point out that it was actually a very good article discussing 25 of sports histories most controversial debates and espn "settles" them. The part of the article that stunned the most for me as a raider fan was that damn tuck rule that would have sent the raiders to the superbowl instead of new england and espn confirmed it was a bad ruling against the raiders.

    0
  • #682921
    AvatarAvatar
    Chewy
    Participant

    Look everyone knows that Magic knows basketball. However, he isn’t very good at talking about basketball. He rambles and repeats himself alot! Magic makes a good point and then repeats himself 3 more times. Wilbon is perfect at cutting Magic off at the right moment so that Magic can make good points and not talk for 2 minutes straight.

     

    0
  • #682919
    AvatarAvatar
    McDunkin

     Wilbon knows Disney is signing those checks…and he wants to keep it that way

    0
  • #682928
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    its tough listening to magic talk ball. He says the most basic stuff but says it really slow and uses hand gestures to emphasize his point as if he explaining rocket science.

    0
  • #682984
    AvatarAvatar
    Hale
    Participant

    The tuck rule is probably the worst call in the history of sports. Really fucked up years of the NFL imo. 

    0
  • #682987
    AvatarAvatar
    mookie
    Participant

     

    He’s like the Big Show…a sellout!  what’s the point of being a journalist if you’re gonna whimp out on asking tough questions?  Jim Rome asked a straight up question and he still getting paid.  Skip bayless gets paid for hatin Lebron.  But wilbon…good god…he is just another uncle tom

    0
  • #682995
    AvatarAvatar
    Chewy
    Participant

    have no credibility. This is how their shows work every time.

    Step 1: Pick a really good or really popular player

    Step 2: If he is good- bash him. If he is liked- bash him

    Step 3: Play devil’s advocate and try to piss off as many people as possible.

    Step 4: Repeat.

    Wilbon is great on PTI, but remember what jhbm24 already said in this post… it’s ABC not ESPN.

    0
  • #682998
    AvatarAvatar
    Hale
    Participant

    +1 for that reference! 

    0
  • #683052
    AvatarAvatar
    NYK2010
    Participant

    Tuck Rule screwed the Raiders but its the rule.

    It happens.

    Magic Johnson I agree with that he just brings an audience I guess.

    0
  • #683062
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    @nyk2010,  The rule states that when bringing the football down in a forward motion on the way to tuck it and you lose it, then it would be considered a incomplete pass. However espn broke down the frame by frame of it and brady made contact with his off hand before the contact from woodson making it a completed tuck thus it should have been ruled a fumble.

    0
  • #683064
    AvatarAvatar
    For_Never_Ever
    Participant

     TaylorCondrin, thats a funny azz line. Lol

    0
  • #683071
    AvatarAvatar
    Tongue-Out-Like-23
    Participant

    llperez

    If ESPN had to play it by frame-by-frame to get an exact result, how difficult do you think it was for referees who saw it with the naked eye and at full speed?

    0
  • #683075
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    i agree its hard to call live. One of the problems is though that live they called it a fumble and ruled it raiders ball. They then reviewed it with the rule being conclusive effidnve needed to overturn the ruling on the field and apparently they felt that the replay conclusively showed it was not a fumble which is the biggest issue i take with it since, as you said, it was so close.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login