This topic contains 12 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by
Chilbert arenas 14 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 6:55pm #31672

rileymcshea3Participanthttp://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=3vyor9z
This first trade would make sense because Bargani would fair nice next to Timmy and Popovich would turn Bargani into a more defensive minded player.The Spurs also wanted to get rid of Tony Parker during the draft and the Rapts would like to get rid of Bargani to clear up minutes for Ed Davis and Jonas Valanciunas , and for the Spurs they still get a good starting Pg with Jose Calderon.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=66f6qou
The second trade gives the Hawks a Center that allows Al Horford to play Pf and they trade Hinrich to give Teague more minutes.For the Jazz they get Monta Ellis while only getting rid of Al Jefferson sounds like a win for them.The Warriors get Josh Smith who would it perfectly on the Warriors run and gun offense and plays Pf for them.They also get Hinrich so they dont have a whole left from Ellis.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=63zzao2
The third trad sends Kaman to the T-Wolves and gives them a Center and more minutes for Derrick Williams and Kevin Love.The Clips get Gallinari an upgrade at Sf and a good scorer .Michael Beasly goes to the Nuggets and replaces Kenyon Martin and they can sighn Wilson Chandler and he wont have to split minutes with Gallo
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 6:56pm #568144

rileymcshea3ParticipantIDC about Neggative points just want your opinions
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 6:56pm #568036

rileymcshea3ParticipantIDC about Neggative points just want your opinions
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:04pm #568160
boshjonesfordParticipantAs a raptors fan i would not want that trade
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:04pm #568052
boshjonesfordParticipantAs a raptors fan i would not want that trade
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:12pm #568168

I May Be WrongParticipantAll of them don’t really work for me bro. I see your idea but in all the trades, someone is getting ripped off somewhere
1st trade – Bargs would be a nice stretch 4 for the Spurs and give Duncan some more scoring punch. And he’s still young and you are right, the Spurs have been open to trading Tony Parker. But that trade would look so much better if Geroge Hill was still with them. Calderon isn’t a fast guard like Tony. Both are weak defensively but at least Tony kept teams on their heels because he can get to rack easily. If George Hill was there, then this trade might work. Parker to the Raptors would be good though
2nd trade – Actually all three teams don’t benefit on this one. The Jazz cannot start Monta at PG and having Monta and Devin Harris would be a very weak and undersized backcourt. The Hawks need a center but not a center who really isn’t a great defender. Andris Beindris is not the problem in the trade. In fact, that would be great because that dude doesn’t score and gives Al Horford all the touches. But if you have Al Jefferson, then Horford is just going to be stuck where he is now cuz Jefferson will take all his shots. And Warriors get a good backup PG but I have no clue how a front court of Josh Smith and David Lee would work out. Sure one is a good shot blocker and another a good rebounder but they will give up size and the Warriors were allready undersized in the backcourt. You cant do that to the front court either. And if you want to put Josh Smith at the SF, then that takes away from Dorrell Wright, who may continue to improve. Sorry, but this trade doesn’t make sense
3rd trade – Actually not a bad trade for the Wolves. They get a center and have more minutes at the forward spot for Williams and Wes Johnson and their other 5 Forwards lol. But only problem is the Nuggets shouldn’t give up on Gallo and I don’t think they would trade him to be replaced by Beasley. Gallo is untradable IMO and the Nuggets are going to make him the SF for the future. Plus, the Clippers could use more of an athletic defensive wing rather than a tall 3 point shooter in Gallo. I think Wilson Chandler would be a better fit for the Clippers and their uptempo play.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:12pm #568061

I May Be WrongParticipantAll of them don’t really work for me bro. I see your idea but in all the trades, someone is getting ripped off somewhere
1st trade – Bargs would be a nice stretch 4 for the Spurs and give Duncan some more scoring punch. And he’s still young and you are right, the Spurs have been open to trading Tony Parker. But that trade would look so much better if Geroge Hill was still with them. Calderon isn’t a fast guard like Tony. Both are weak defensively but at least Tony kept teams on their heels because he can get to rack easily. If George Hill was there, then this trade might work. Parker to the Raptors would be good though
2nd trade – Actually all three teams don’t benefit on this one. The Jazz cannot start Monta at PG and having Monta and Devin Harris would be a very weak and undersized backcourt. The Hawks need a center but not a center who really isn’t a great defender. Andris Beindris is not the problem in the trade. In fact, that would be great because that dude doesn’t score and gives Al Horford all the touches. But if you have Al Jefferson, then Horford is just going to be stuck where he is now cuz Jefferson will take all his shots. And Warriors get a good backup PG but I have no clue how a front court of Josh Smith and David Lee would work out. Sure one is a good shot blocker and another a good rebounder but they will give up size and the Warriors were allready undersized in the backcourt. You cant do that to the front court either. And if you want to put Josh Smith at the SF, then that takes away from Dorrell Wright, who may continue to improve. Sorry, but this trade doesn’t make sense
3rd trade – Actually not a bad trade for the Wolves. They get a center and have more minutes at the forward spot for Williams and Wes Johnson and their other 5 Forwards lol. But only problem is the Nuggets shouldn’t give up on Gallo and I don’t think they would trade him to be replaced by Beasley. Gallo is untradable IMO and the Nuggets are going to make him the SF for the future. Plus, the Clippers could use more of an athletic defensive wing rather than a tall 3 point shooter in Gallo. I think Wilson Chandler would be a better fit for the Clippers and their uptempo play.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:23pm #568075
MCRIZZParticipantquick thoughts on something like this possibly?
Raptors give: amir johnson and leandro barbosa
Clippers Give : chris kaman
toronto gets the perfect stop gap for Big val, and 12 mil off the books after that season (as well as freeing up logjam of PF)
Clippers get a great backup PF with good energy/defense, and a real good backup sg after eric gordon…If leandro does not work out they still get 7.6 mil off the books at the end of the season
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:23pm #568183
MCRIZZParticipantquick thoughts on something like this possibly?
Raptors give: amir johnson and leandro barbosa
Clippers Give : chris kaman
toronto gets the perfect stop gap for Big val, and 12 mil off the books after that season (as well as freeing up logjam of PF)
Clippers get a great backup PF with good energy/defense, and a real good backup sg after eric gordon…If leandro does not work out they still get 7.6 mil off the books at the end of the season
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:27pm #568079

TeamShowtimeLakersParticipanti like trade number 3
0 - Posted on: Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:27pm #568187

TeamShowtimeLakersParticipanti like trade number 3
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/11/2011 - 7:27am #568454

Chilbert arenasParticipant^ Agree, I especially would like to see Beasley go to the Nugs
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/11/2011 - 7:27am #568564

Chilbert arenasParticipant^ Agree, I especially would like to see Beasley go to the Nugs
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |