the 5 POSSIBLE #1 picks (most in a while)

How did you come up with these percentages? lol 

How did you come up with these percentages? lol 

How did you come up with these percentages? lol 

lmao

Would you consider taking a percentage or two away from Irving and putting Kanter in there as a sixth candidate? 

lmao

Would you consider taking a percentage or two away from Irving and putting Kanter in there as a sixth candidate? 

lmao

Would you consider taking a percentage or two away from Irving and putting Kanter in there as a sixth candidate? 

Kinda skeptical about where your numbers come from…

What is your variance based off of?

What did you set as your sample mean; what is that mean based off of?

What do these percentages represent?

Are the percentages based off of opinions of experts or yourself? If they are from experts, which ones? 

I’m starting to think you’re just making up numbers.

Kinda skeptical about where your numbers come from…

What is your variance based off of?

What did you set as your sample mean; what is that mean based off of?

What do these percentages represent?

Are the percentages based off of opinions of experts or yourself? If they are from experts, which ones? 

I’m starting to think you’re just making up numbers.

Kinda skeptical about where your numbers come from…

What is your variance based off of?

What did you set as your sample mean; what is that mean based off of?

What do these percentages represent?

Are the percentages based off of opinions of experts or yourself? If they are from experts, which ones? 

I’m starting to think you’re just making up numbers.

This sounds fun, I want in!

 Keith Benson – .096

This sounds fun, I want in!

 Keith Benson – .096

This sounds fun, I want in!

 Keith Benson – .096

Thats Ivy League you not messing with that man

Thats Ivy League you not messing with that man

Thats Ivy League you not messing with that man

darko milicic: 8.2%…he’s re-entering…he’s THAT good

darko milicic: 8.2%…he’s re-entering…he’s THAT good

darko milicic: 8.2%…he’s re-entering…he’s THAT good

before the season barnes was the clear cut no 1 but he hasnt been very productive early on and irving jones and big sull have looked very dominant i meant t jones havent kept up on p jones

before the season barnes was the clear cut no 1 but he hasnt been very productive early on and irving jones and big sull have looked very dominant i meant t jones havent kept up on p jones

before the season barnes was the clear cut no 1 but he hasnt been very productive early on and irving jones and big sull have looked very dominant i meant t jones havent kept up on p jones

i can’t believe i’m saying this but Harrison isn’t worth 50plus% for now..

i can’t believe i’m saying this but Harrison isn’t worth 50plus% for now..

i can’t believe i’m saying this but Harrison isn’t worth 50plus% for now..

If you go beyond numbers Irving has a better chance than Terrence Jones. A number of low ranked teams need a star point-guard; Toronto, Clippers, Detroit, Sacramento are all a possibility to land the number one pick with no definite PG for the future (Kings have been playing Reke at the 2 a lot this season so it looks like they are going to want a PG).

If you go beyond numbers Irving has a better chance than Terrence Jones. A number of low ranked teams need a star point-guard; Toronto, Clippers, Detroit, Sacramento are all a possibility to land the number one pick with no definite PG for the future (Kings have been playing Reke at the 2 a lot this season so it looks like they are going to want a PG).

If you go beyond numbers Irving has a better chance than Terrence Jones. A number of low ranked teams need a star point-guard; Toronto, Clippers, Detroit, Sacramento are all a possibility to land the number one pick with no definite PG for the future (Kings have been playing Reke at the 2 a lot this season so it looks like they are going to want a PG).

No offense to Sullinger but I think his chances of going number one rival my chances of banging Megan Fox!

No offense to Sullinger but I think his chances of going number one rival my chances of banging Megan Fox!

No offense to Sullinger but I think his chances of going number one rival my chances of banging Megan Fox!

If there is no standout number one then everything could depend on team needs and hence the draft lottery effectively decides the draft order but in recent years, I cannot recall there being a shock number one come draft day. Eg the guy everyone had down to go 2nd suddenly goes number 1, players do slide and shoot up the draft but most people can probably pick the top 10 a lot easier than further down the draft.

Sullinger has had a great start to his college career but I could not see an undersized C going number 1 unless he is really a peak Big Ben Wallace mk II and after weighing in at 286lbs last summer if Sullinger is that size or bigger next summer it may well put a few teams off. Sullinger in my mind at the moment is a very likely top 5 pick whose upside could be as high as number 3 but I just don’t see him as a top pick.

If there is no standout number one then everything could depend on team needs and hence the draft lottery effectively decides the draft order but in recent years, I cannot recall there being a shock number one come draft day. Eg the guy everyone had down to go 2nd suddenly goes number 1, players do slide and shoot up the draft but most people can probably pick the top 10 a lot easier than further down the draft.

Sullinger has had a great start to his college career but I could not see an undersized C going number 1 unless he is really a peak Big Ben Wallace mk II and after weighing in at 286lbs last summer if Sullinger is that size or bigger next summer it may well put a few teams off. Sullinger in my mind at the moment is a very likely top 5 pick whose upside could be as high as number 3 but I just don’t see him as a top pick.

If there is no standout number one then everything could depend on team needs and hence the draft lottery effectively decides the draft order but in recent years, I cannot recall there being a shock number one come draft day. Eg the guy everyone had down to go 2nd suddenly goes number 1, players do slide and shoot up the draft but most people can probably pick the top 10 a lot easier than further down the draft.

Sullinger has had a great start to his college career but I could not see an undersized C going number 1 unless he is really a peak Big Ben Wallace mk II and after weighing in at 286lbs last summer if Sullinger is that size or bigger next summer it may well put a few teams off. Sullinger in my mind at the moment is a very likely top 5 pick whose upside could be as high as number 3 but I just don’t see him as a top pick.

Barnes is still clearcut.  His problem right now is that Carolina is not that good, mainly because of Drew’s non-existance at point and the fact that Bullock should be in the starting lineup to take some of the perimeter pressure off of Barnes, which as of right now Barnes is the only perimeter threat in the starting 5.  If you based on how they are playing plus potential,  I like Jones, but NBA scouts just dont see him over P. Jones or Barnes.  UK is poop without Jones in the lineup, as evidenced against UConn.  Let me say however, this may come down to still what team gets that pick.

Barnes is still clearcut.  His problem right now is that Carolina is not that good, mainly because of Drew’s non-existance at point and the fact that Bullock should be in the starting lineup to take some of the perimeter pressure off of Barnes, which as of right now Barnes is the only perimeter threat in the starting 5.  If you based on how they are playing plus potential,  I like Jones, but NBA scouts just dont see him over P. Jones or Barnes.  UK is poop without Jones in the lineup, as evidenced against UConn.  Let me say however, this may come down to still what team gets that pick.

Barnes is still clearcut.  His problem right now is that Carolina is not that good, mainly because of Drew’s non-existance at point and the fact that Bullock should be in the starting lineup to take some of the perimeter pressure off of Barnes, which as of right now Barnes is the only perimeter threat in the starting 5.  If you based on how they are playing plus potential,  I like Jones, but NBA scouts just dont see him over P. Jones or Barnes.  UK is poop without Jones in the lineup, as evidenced against UConn.  Let me say however, this may come down to still what team gets that pick.

 I saw the espn ticker with barnes only scoring 8 points(3-12) against a lower level school cant even remember the name of them, is there really noone better to be the number one pick?

 I saw the espn ticker with barnes only scoring 8 points(3-12) against a lower level school cant even remember the name of them, is there really noone better to be the number one pick?

 I saw the espn ticker with barnes only scoring 8 points(3-12) against a lower level school cant even remember the name of them, is there really noone better to be the number one pick?