Jordan Williams - NBADraft.net

This topic contains 8 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by stanford hoops 15 years, 7 months ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 10:24am #23080

ghettosermon
Participant
What are his prospects in the 2011 or 2012 drafts? Is he a possible lottery pick? I know people love to compare him to Lonny Baxter because of the school but he definitely looks taller and way more athletic. I just love what a see in Williams. Huge kid and a rare traditional old school post bruiser, he also has extremely soft hands, good passing skills, and plays with lots of intensity. Anyone else think he has lottery potential?
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 10:34am #432762

JNixon
Participant
He has late 1st round potential. He’s taller than Baxter and probably wider at 6’10 280, so I’d think he’d have a better chance at success. He’s a 2012 or 2013 prospect, but I do think he’ll be an impact player for Maryland this year. He reminds me of a shorter version of Roy Hibbert honestly.
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 10:34am #432769

JNixon
Participant
He has late 1st round potential. He’s taller than Baxter and probably wider at 6’10 280, so I’d think he’d have a better chance at success. He’s a 2012 or 2013 prospect, but I do think he’ll be an impact player for Maryland this year. He reminds me of a shorter version of Roy Hibbert honestly.
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 10:51am #432794

stanford hoops
I see him as a 2012 prospect. He’s bigger but a tad less athletic. Lonnie was shorter but could still get up and down the court and bang on you (vert measured at 34inch his soph year). In the two games this year jordan has been balling hopefully he can keep it up
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 10:51am #432801

stanford hoops
I see him as a 2012 prospect. He’s bigger but a tad less athletic. Lonnie was shorter but could still get up and down the court and bang on you (vert measured at 34inch his soph year). In the two games this year jordan has been balling hopefully he can keep it up
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 10:55am #432798

BothTeamsPlayedHard
Participant
I think the Baxter comparisons are fair in that they are both intense, bad-bodied Maryland big men with decent skills. The problem with Baxter wasn’t on the court. If it was only about what he was able to do on the court, Baxter would have never fallen out of the NBA, but he wasn’t good enough to be as dumb as he was with guns.
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 10:55am #432805

BothTeamsPlayedHard
Participant
I think the Baxter comparisons are fair in that they are both intense, bad-bodied Maryland big men with decent skills. The problem with Baxter wasn’t on the court. If it was only about what he was able to do on the court, Baxter would have never fallen out of the NBA, but he wasn’t good enough to be as dumb as he was with guns.
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 11:02am #432808

stanford hoops
Lol
at bad bodies. So true
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 11:02am #432815

stanford hoops
Lol
at bad bodies. So true
0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.