This topic contains 14 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by 
omphalos 15 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 3:02pm #23023
TRC1991Participanthere they are without seeing John Hollinger’s rankings and stock UP/DOWN/EVEN
1) LA Lakers 7-0
2) Orlando 5-1
3) Boston 6-2
4) San Antonio 5-1
5) New Orleans 6-0
6) Miami 5-2
7) Atlanta 6-2
8) Golden State 5-2
9) Portland 5-3
10) Denver 4-3
11) Dallas 4-2
12) Chicago 3-3
13) Utah 3-3
14) Oklahoma City 3-3
15) Memphis 4-4
16) New York 3-3
17) Sacramento 3-3
18) Phoenix 3-4
19) Houston 1-5
20) Cleveland 3-3
21) Indiana 2-3
22) New Jersey 2-4
23) Philadelphia 2-5
24) Milwaukee 2-5
25) Washington 1-4
26) Detroit 2-5
27) Toronto 1-6
28) LA Clippers 1-6
29) Charlotte 1-6
30) Minnesota 1-6
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 3:15pm #431556
BasketBalAllanParticipantI like these rankings as a Kings fan, but I am think mabey move them down one spot. Although the general position of each team I happen to agree with give or take a spot or two.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 3:15pm #431577
BasketBalAllanParticipantI like these rankings as a Kings fan, but I am think mabey move them down one spot. Although the general position of each team I happen to agree with give or take a spot or two.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 3:25pm #431560
ChewyParticipanthow NO Hornets can be 6-0 and still be 5 in the power ranking. I agree with it, just find it funny tho.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 3:25pm #431581
ChewyParticipanthow NO Hornets can be 6-0 and still be 5 in the power ranking. I agree with it, just find it funny tho.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 3:30pm #431562
Toronto16ParticipantHouston kinda high, no?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 3:30pm #431583
Toronto16ParticipantHouston kinda high, no?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 5:16pm #431653
sheltwon3ParticipantNew Orleans should at least be 3.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 5:16pm #431671
sheltwon3ParticipantNew Orleans should at least be 3.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 6:15pm #431719
RickyRubio9ParticipantI would be panicking as a Houston fan, but the teams we played were like a combined 25-5 and we barely lost to the Lakers and Spurs.
We led every game at the half except the Spurs game, just disappointing 2nd half and bad coaching thus far.
Aaron Brooks loss will hurt us, but I like Ishmael Smith. Hopefully Lowry can come back.
We should be able to garner a few wins in our next few games; we play the Knicks, Pacers, and Wizards (not in order). At least 2 of 3. I expect a 4 game-winning streak or hope for.0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 6:15pm #431738
RickyRubio9ParticipantI would be panicking as a Houston fan, but the teams we played were like a combined 25-5 and we barely lost to the Lakers and Spurs.
We led every game at the half except the Spurs game, just disappointing 2nd half and bad coaching thus far.
Aaron Brooks loss will hurt us, but I like Ishmael Smith. Hopefully Lowry can come back.
We should be able to garner a few wins in our next few games; we play the Knicks, Pacers, and Wizards (not in order). At least 2 of 3. I expect a 4 game-winning streak or hope for.0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 7:44pm #431744
Kinguy11ParticipantWhy is Houston Number 19 when they are 25th in the league?
I also agree with sheltwon, New Orleans should at least be three, they’re tied first in the league!
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 7:44pm #431761
Kinguy11ParticipantWhy is Houston Number 19 when they are 25th in the league?
I also agree with sheltwon, New Orleans should at least be three, they’re tied first in the league!
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 8:12pm #431752
omphalosParticipant^ ^ ^ because power rankings go beyond simple win-loss percentage otherwise there would be no point to them?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 11/09/2010 - 8:12pm #431768
omphalosParticipant^ ^ ^ because power rankings go beyond simple win-loss percentage otherwise there would be no point to them?
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |