This topic contains 13 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar DoubleNickelsDurr55 15 years, 8 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #22059
    AvatarAvatar
    The Splash Doc
    Participant

    When they made the Brown/Gasol/Crittenton trade for Pau Gasol do you think they would replace the rights to Marc Gasol with Andrew Bynum due to his durability.

    Gasol-Gasol-Odom-Ratliff-Caracter

    Bryant-Artest-Barnes-Ebanks

    Fisher-Blake-Brown

    do you take this Laker team or the one with Baby Gasol

    0
  • #408856
    AvatarAvatar
    Charlie Sheen
    Participant

    Personally I’d take Marc Gasol and Pau Gasol inside only due to Bynum’s durability but if Bynum could play in 75 games a year then I’d probally keep Bynum

    0
  • #408857
    AvatarAvatar
    RUDEBOY_
    Participant

    If they had gotten Marc they wouldn’t have Aretest..They got Artest becuz they felt they needed some toughness..Marc would’ve gave then that…the Grizzlies would’ve love getting Bynum…

    0
  • #408858
    AvatarAvatar
    The Splash Doc
    Participant

    Would they basically replace Bynum with Gasol and they would’ve gotten Artest anyway because Ariza wanted to get paid and Kobe and Odom really wanted Artest

    0
  • #408859
    AvatarAvatar
    RUDEBOY_
    Participant

    hey young splash..i see u new in the hood..

    seems like you know a little basketball..

    who are your favorite posters so far?

    0
  • #408862
    AvatarAvatar
    The Splash Doc
    Participant

    You

    OJJ

    Reke-DMC

    B-Rabbit

    Scarecrow

    NoMoney

    thats all who caught my eye

    but I see guys are a little angry sometims I mean i dont care about points but I feel if you minus someone explain yourself and its suppose to be debating so tell me why you think im wrong then we can go at it but i like the sight and who’s DNyce

    0
  • #408865
    AvatarAvatar
    Steroid
    Participant

    I’m sure they would have definitely taken Gasol if they would have known Bynum would have been this injury prone. At least I would have. When Bynum plays he makes a good impact, but he is useless when he doesn’t play which is pretty often..

    0
  • #408866
    AvatarAvatar
    kurtu17
    Participant

    man i agree people should not just minus ppl just for somethin they dont agree with…i understand if its somethin that doesnt make sense or if its ludicrous…but its all good

    0
  • #408867
    AvatarAvatar
    RUDEBOY_
    Participant

    DNYCE is the Dave Chappelle of this site..He’s good for a great laugh…

    Whenever you see a headline that says ”Lakers trade Bynum”’

    thats a DYNCE Post…

    0
  • #408878
    AvatarAvatar
    WizardofOz
    Participant

    No love for me Young Spalsh?

    0
  • #408884
    AvatarAvatar
    The Splash Doc
    Participant

    oh my bad Wiz your good too also

    Oh canada he’s good and the other canadian poster

    0
  • #408890
    AvatarAvatar
    The Scare Crow Returns
    Participant

    LOL Just kidding…Your the Truth…But for Real I’d take the Gasol Brothers and Odom…Throw in any veteran as the 4th Big and the Lakers are Golden..I honestly see Marc signing there when his deal is done in Memphis…He and Pau have always wanted to play together in the NBA..Withy the pick of Thabeet the Grizzles handcuffed them selves to him for at least the next few years( if they don’t wanna look foolish for Drafting him with the # 2 pick…Could have traded that or drafted Tyreke Evans who played at Memphis for his 1 and done college career)…Now I feel like they have to pick one or the other Zac or Marc Gasol…I would of course choose Marc and just try to move Randolph to a Contender…a team like The Spurs strike me as a good trade partner…Zac and Mike Conley for Tony Parker and Big man X…Tiago Splitter??? Any way I’d Keep Gasol over Randolph and would take him over Bynum…(durabilty,chemistry with Pau and over skillset for a C…

    0
  • #408904
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    As much as Bynum has been hurt, I do not think there is anyway I would have traded him for Marc Gasol. Still wouldn’t. Hindsight is 20/20 guys. I mean, Marc has been in the league for two years, putting up solid numbers and showing that he is not exactly "Pau Gasol’s Fat Little Brother". He is a very solid player, a big part of why the Grizz improved so much this past year, he has even shown some of the abilities that make Pau such a unique and respected big man. However, he also has limited athletic ability and defensive potential, both of which are nowhere near that of Pau, or Bynum. So, let’s think about the two years since Marc has been in the league? Yes, Bynum has been hurt, and his ability in the play-offs has been mediocre at best. But, THE LAKERS WON TWO RINGS. To say they would have done the same thing with Marc at the Center spot is possible, but I do not see it as a guarantee, especially this past year in the play-offs. Bynum’s length makes him an infinitely more potent defender, and I just think Bynum has a certain toughness. It is truly hard for me to see Marc Gasol being as valuable to the Lakers as Andrew Bynum, say whatever you want about health and numbers (which only aid Gasol due to health, but again, no gurantee he would have the same role on LA as he does in Memphis). All in all, I do not think I make a change in that trade whatsoever. Marc was an unknown quantity, many thought he might not make much of an impact in the NBA, but he indeed worked his butt off and has proved critics wrong (including myself). He is indeed a very solid big man, but why trade a player from a team that has won two titles? You can say to keep winning titles, but again, I say that it would be no guarantee that Marc would have won you those two titles or would help them to more thereafter. 

    0
  • #408972
    AvatarAvatar
    DoubleNickelsDurr55
    Participant

    The key here was to rid themselves of Kwame "I have a perminent pout on my face" Brown. That trade alone shows the NBA that Jerry West wants to be the GM of the Lakers and that Mitch better watch his back. Regardless of what could of happened. I like the possibilites with Bynum. He is 22 years old with a life time of basketball yet to be playd in the NBA. we have seen flashes of his potential and that alone makes me think they made the right move.

    They are on the verge of a three peat. In todays game a possibility of a three peat shouldnt even be possible. Good move Lakers, well play’d sir’s. Oh and I am a Celtics fan.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login