This topic contains 18 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by 
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:17am #55437
Another player I thought would be a steal in this draft has measured out to 6’8.75 in shoes which I will say is 6’9 . I can only think that these measurements might give him a huge boost in draft stock. He is very athletic can shoot it I’m just amazed how he measured out. Do you guys think his stock will increase ?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:24am #901653
DipoTimeParticipantIf I’m not mistaken he measured out at 6"5.5" without shoes and 6’6.75" with them
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:24am #901770
DipoTimeParticipantIf I’m not mistaken he measured out at 6"5.5" without shoes and 6’6.75" with them
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:26am #901655
strobox88ParticipantWait, I thought it was 6’6.75″ with shoes.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:26am #901772
strobox88ParticipantWait, I thought it was 6’6.75″ with shoes.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:29am #901657
CameronCrazy11ParticipantChad Ford tweeted what the original post says but both heights measured are actually two inches shorter I believe. Glenn Robinson III was indeed measured at 6’6.75″ in shoes.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:29am #901774
CameronCrazy11ParticipantChad Ford tweeted what the original post says but both heights measured are actually two inches shorter I believe. Glenn Robinson III was indeed measured at 6’6.75″ in shoes.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:31am #901659
Bad report I read chad fords sorry for the mis led information I seen went a double checked tried to edit post but didn’t know how
0- Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:58am #901675
XYRYXParticipantI was cunfused too to see the Cad Ford comments who don’t seem to be true.
Ford tweeted that James Young was measured the following: James Young measured 6′ 5.25" in socks. 6′ 7.75" in shoes. 7′ 0 wing. 8′ 8" standing reach. Great measurements.
(Should mean 6′ 6.75" in shoes)
Most likely just a typo but if you are Chad Ford and tweeting about things like that you should double check what you’re spreading before sending it out to the world.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:58am #901793
XYRYXParticipantI was cunfused too to see the Cad Ford comments who don’t seem to be true.
Ford tweeted that James Young was measured the following: James Young measured 6′ 5.25" in socks. 6′ 7.75" in shoes. 7′ 0 wing. 8′ 8" standing reach. Great measurements.
(Should mean 6′ 6.75" in shoes)
Most likely just a typo but if you are Chad Ford and tweeting about things like that you should double check what you’re spreading before sending it out to the world.
0
- Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:31am #901777
Bad report I read chad fords sorry for the mis led information I seen went a double checked tried to edit post but didn’t know how
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:33am #901661
mikeyvthedonParticipantThe nba.com Anthropometric have him at 6’5.5 and 6’6.78 (which is weird and I am guessing might be a key slip) on their current list:
Was wondering where people were getting the number, than I saw who posted it, Chad Ford:
https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/466980292448636928
Well, maybe Glenn grew a ton, though am guessing Chad was maybe looking at James Michael McAdoo’s height with an without shoes? Because Glenn measures out to what people might round up to 6’7, just not 6’9. Could be wrong and Chad could be right, though I would think this might be a situation where I would want to look at the official measurement before quoting his word as gospel. Will also take the 8’4.5 standing reach (which is slightly above average for a SG and below average for a SF) as a sign Glenn didn’t grow 3 inches from his listed height at Michigan.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:33am #901779
mikeyvthedonParticipantThe nba.com Anthropometric have him at 6’5.5 and 6’6.78 (which is weird and I am guessing might be a key slip) on their current list:
Was wondering where people were getting the number, than I saw who posted it, Chad Ford:
https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/466980292448636928
Well, maybe Glenn grew a ton, though am guessing Chad was maybe looking at James Michael McAdoo’s height with an without shoes? Because Glenn measures out to what people might round up to 6’7, just not 6’9. Could be wrong and Chad could be right, though I would think this might be a situation where I would want to look at the official measurement before quoting his word as gospel. Will also take the 8’4.5 standing reach (which is slightly above average for a SG and below average for a SF) as a sign Glenn didn’t grow 3 inches from his listed height at Michigan.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:34am #901667
Hoopshype.com said he measure out 6’8 in shoes that’s where I got it from then I later checked his other link sorry again
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:34am #901785
Hoopshype.com said he measure out 6’8 in shoes that’s where I got it from then I later checked his other link sorry again
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:39am #901669
mikeyvthedonParticipantIs Chad Ford, lol:
http://hoopshype.com/rumors/tag/glenn_robinson
Guessing Chad must be busy with draft coverage, otherwise he would probably delete it.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 9:39am #901787
mikeyvthedonParticipantIs Chad Ford, lol:
http://hoopshype.com/rumors/tag/glenn_robinson
Guessing Chad must be busy with draft coverage, otherwise he would probably delete it.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 10:36am #901697
Lotto StudParticipantAlthough the measureables aren’t true, hypothetically speaking now where would those stats project him in the draft and which team would be the most eager to select him?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/15/2014 - 10:36am #901815
Lotto StudParticipantAlthough the measureables aren’t true, hypothetically speaking now where would those stats project him in the draft and which team would be the most eager to select him?
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |