Top 10 prospects comparisons and analysis
That is not a valid arguement. Raul Lopez played in the Olympics when he was 20. Patrick Mills played in the Olympics last year. Are they more skilled than Stockton?
I really don't care about points. I know it's you that keeps giving me thumbs-down. I'm also pretty sure you give yourself points on every post. It's a flawed system that stands for nothing.
i'm really not giving you the thumbs down. and i just have 90+ posts then i get 200+ points. yeah they did play, But nobody played in the level that Rubio played. butidonthavemoney honestly do you play ball or just watch? you'll know the difference when you play.
This is going around in circles. I feel like I can't get anywhere arguing with you. If that is your opinion, whatever. Your point is so obscure I don't even know how to respond. I'm sure you know what you're talking about but I don't understand at all.
I have nothing else to say. Lets just agree to disagree.
If you won't do that, then let me fuel your homophobic rant before I go.
Stockton looks good in short shorts.
Bring it on.
Peace.
yeah surely, that's why i compared him to an 18 year old Stockton, butihavenomoney maybe right that it was not right comparing him, But I really think Rubio was a better player at this point.
Rubio at this point of his career has more skills than John Stockton. Stockton, one of the best of all-time is a great point guard, that may not be the case for Rubio in the future, But as of this point of their careers Rubio has more potential and skill.
That might be true. I have no idea how good Stockton was going into Gonzaga but he had a very good college career. He was the 5th ranked pg coming out of college so I assume Rubio is ahead of where Stockton was at 18 years old.
Deeds is trying to say that Rubio is flashier than Stockton... If, by more skilled, you mean flashier, than maybe I'll give you that.
Stockton was so skilled that he didnt' have to do anything spectacular to be, IMO, the best/most efficient PG ever.
Rubio can't even make a jumper! how could he be more skilled? he just ATTEMPTS more ridiculous passes... just cause stockton didn't ATTEMPT to make those foolish plays, doesn't mean he wasn't able to, it just means that he was skilled enough to score pretty much at-will so he didn't waste his time with garbage passes that have slim to no chance of being completed....
deeds why you so homophobic? got a little secret? right when someone attacks your point they're gay? what are you covering up...










He really has more skills, Stockton may be better but he really has more skills, You'll know that once you take a look at their games.