Tony Wroten
I think his future is at PG and he has very good size for the position and has a knack for getting into the lane and making flashy passes to his teammates for easy baskets. He is a good athlete and a very good ball handler. He needs to work on his shooting ability and increase his range in order to become a more complete player. He also needs work on his overall consistency and come out to play game in and game out. This guy was really hyped up early in his career because he was ranked as the #1 6th grader. He was widely regarded as the #1 player in the class of 2011 up unto his sophomore year in HS and has slid down the rankings ever since, but there is no question that he is one of the best players in his class.
I think his future is at PG and he has very good size for the position and has a knack for getting into the lane and making flashy passes to his teammates for easy baskets. He is a good athlete and a very good ball handler. He needs to work on his shooting ability and increase his range in order to become a more complete player. He also needs work on his overall consistency and come out to play game in and game out. This guy was really hyped up early in his career because he was ranked as the #1 6th grader. He was widely regarded as the #1 player in the class of 2011 up unto his sophomore year in HS and has slid down the rankings ever since, but there is no question that he is one of the best players in his class.www.thehouseofgucci.com cheap wholesale Louis Vuitton Mens Shoes,Tapout Clothing
tony wroten was once the #1 player in the 2011 class but he started to slide down a bit then he got injured last season and didnt play his whole junior year but he has came back strong this summer and they said he played well for the usa team this summer. Thi site compares him to Rodney Stuckey and James Harden. So yall agree with that comparsion? If not. Who do he reminds you guys of? He is a point guard to me with very good passy to fancy at times but he can pass and has good court vision. Is his future at the 1 or 2?