share

Suns-Warriors Trade Rumors?

NCKevin11
Registered User
Joined: 06/08/2009
Posts: 25
Points: 25
Offline
Suns-Warriors Trade Rumors?

Heard it on TV...

Warriors get...
Amare Stoudemire

Suns get...
Brandan Wright
Marco Belinelli
Other Player
Warriors 1st Round

not completed yet... but any thoughts


Scott42444
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 538
Points: 331
Offline
I think that it's stupid

I think that it's stupid from a Warriors perspective for 1 reason only.

I don't think that Amare Stoudemire will be a Warrior in 2010-2011.

Giving up Wright, the possibility of grabbing Hill at #7, and a couple others for what will probably amount to nothing (I don't think that the Warriors are anywhere near a contender in the West with their current roster). The Warriors made a strong impression in the playoffs a couple of seasons ago, but that is because they shocked the Mavericks in the first round. They haven't gotten better in the interim. Yes, it seems like they got a really good player in the draft last year in Randolph, but he wasn't even a lock to be considered Top 10 out of last year's rookie class.

If I were the Warriors, I would trade #7 for a true PG. That would enhance the existing roster.

But, Nellie doesn't think conventionally.

llperez
llperez's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/13/2009
Posts: 11894
Points: 11689
Offline
warriors

I don't think Wright or Bellinenli would have amounted to anything great. There are no gaurantees at #7, and I don't see why Amare would'nt want to resign in GState. They will surely offer him top dollar and the Bay area is beautiful. Amare with Monta, Jackson, and Maggette could prove to be a force immediately in the west.

knicksfreak
knicksfreak's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/09/2009
Posts: 1409
Points: 244
Offline
Its only a rumor.

Its only a rumor.

Scott42444
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 538
Points: 331
Offline
I like the Bay Area, I guess

I like the Bay Area, I guess I don't have any good reason for saying that llperez22. I am usually long winded about my reasons, I just feel that way. You ever just feel a certain way about teams and players, even though there is no reason to back your feelings up.

Plus, I think that Amare would help make the Warriors a playoff team, but I don't think that they are contenders. Plus, if they sign Amare long-term, they would have...

Ellis, Biedrins, Maggette, and Jackson at $40,000,000.00 (around) and Amare at $18,000,000.00 in about 2 seasons.

That's $60 million committed to a team that has 1 star and 4 "almost" all-stars. I think that the Spurs, Mavs, Lakers, Portland, Denver, and Houston are above G.S. next season at least. The only year that Amare is guaranteed. Of course, having Amare and giving up 3 non-starters is a good deal (assuming that #7 would be a 6th man in 2009-2010).

Maybe I'm wrong here.

kacey
Registered User
Joined: 06/16/2009
Posts: 1565
Points: -139
Offline
Trade is dead. Not going to

Trade is dead. Not going to happen

SmooveKRYPT
SmooveKRYPT's picture
Registered User
Joined: 02/13/2009
Posts: 607
Points: 1043
Offline
Actually its much more than

Actually its much more than a rumor, its actually pretty close to a done deal, they're just waiting til July 1st because of Biedrins' contract...

The terms are...

GS gets: Amare Stoudemire

PHX gets: Biedrins, 7th pick(Steph Curry), Brandan Wright and/or Bellineli

dmo21
dmo21's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/24/2009
Posts: 1050
Points: 881
Offline
bad idea

fot the warriors, give away good players to rent amare

RSS: Syndicate content