This topic contains 5 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Siggy 11 years, 4 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Fri, 11/16/2012 - 6:32pm #44636
Lotto StudParticipantWho will said to have a better pro career when it is over?
Who has the better attributes?
Athleticism-
Size-
Defense-
Strength-
Quickness-
Leadership-
Jumpshot-
Ballhandling-
Passing-
Intangibles-
0 - Posted on: Fri, 11/16/2012 - 7:40pm #728692
OfficialWho has the better attributes? Goodwin
Athleticism- Goodwin
Size- Goodwin
Defense- Goodwin
Strength- IDK
Quickness- Goodwin
Leadership- Goodwin
Jumpshot- Purvis
Ballhandling- Goodwin
Passing- Goodwin
0 - Posted on: Fri, 11/16/2012 - 8:22pm #728697
HaleParticipantThis is a really good question, and it’s tough because I think they are pretty close in most areas. I think the only obvious ones would be size for Goodwin, and strength for Purvis.
0- Posted on: Fri, 11/16/2012 - 8:25pm #728698
Officialyea i was think Purvis might be stronger.
0
- Posted on: Fri, 11/16/2012 - 8:30pm #728699
Yandyhere2ParticipantGoodwin is for sure faster and more explosive than Purvis
0 - Posted on: Sat, 11/17/2012 - 8:00am #728728
SiggyParticipantIf you break down their individual attributes and simply count them up, they would appear to be almost even. But player comparison is more complex than that. Archie’s better length, similar athleticism and overall size gives him a major advantage at the SG position. Now if we were comparing their attributes as combo guards or strictly PG prospects, I’d actually give Purvis the edge. Purvis’ size disadvantage would actually be a strength at the PG position. Obviously Archie would still have better size, but I think Purvis has better playmaking ability and an overall better feel for the point position. It might not show since he’s playing off the ball again, but Purvis has been making the transition to the point for the past year and a half or so. He was actually a full time PG last year
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |