This topic contains 4 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Lebron’s Hairline 11 years, 6 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/16/2012 - 12:27pm #43871
    AvatarAvatar
    Lebron’s Hairline
    Participant

    Rank these teams based on pure talent and potential, not who won a ring or not. 00-01 Kings, 06-07 Suns, 07-08 Spurs, 08-09 Celtics, 12-13 Lakers.

    0
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/16/2012 - 2:41pm #721169
    AvatarAvatar
    WinterSoldier
    Participant

    How can you rank a Laker team that hasn’t played yet.

    0
    • Posted on: Tue, 10/16/2012 - 5:07pm #721183
      AvatarAvatar
      Lebron’s Hairline
      Participant

      I said BASED OFF TALENT. I’m asking which teams had the most talent

      0
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/16/2012 - 4:22pm #721179
    AvatarAvatar
    F_S mock

    spurs

    celtics

    lakers

    suns:  nash- stat- matrix: epic but always lacked a go-to scorer IMO. sure there are some exceptions, but i believe you need a great go-to scorer to win it all… 

     

    0
    • Posted on: Tue, 10/16/2012 - 4:40pm #721181
      AvatarAvatar
      F_S mock

      "but i believe you need a great go-to scorer to win it all…"

      if not great go-to scorer, at least a couple guys that can get theirs on isolations. nash scores within a team’s offense, stat was by no means a go-to scorer wether being the high post or low post. and marion as well… no go to scorer. 

      spurs had timmy and the argentinian prick. plus parker who was/is a scoring pg shooting amongst the highest fg% inside the paint who can easily get buckets.

      boston had paul pierce: great go to scorer

      lakers have kobe: great go to scorer

      0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login