NCAA Tournament Selections Show
Florida as a two seed and UK only got a four seed? Don't know about that. Plenty of solid teams as the 2-4 seeds. Florida has to be the weakest of the bunch.
Oh crap, more bubble teams didn't make it, lets just add four more teams to the Tourney next year and make it 72 teams.
Colorado should've gotten in. That's the biggest snub to me. EASILY too. They were a tourny team. Virginia Tech was 50/50 to me.
Florida isn't deserving of being a 2 seed. They are a 3 or probably even a 4 to me.
Kansas State is going to have a tough one against Utah State.
Why are UAB and VCU in the tourny? I don't get it.
Colorado not getting in is a joke.
The East is ridiculous. Marquette and 11? You kidding me.
The First Four is ghey.
Kentucky is the best 4-seed ever.
Nova could actually beat Ohio State in the 2nd round if they return to past form.
Remember, Nova has 7 quality wins on the year.
Again, watch out for Oakland.
Texas is an amazing 4-seed too.
St. John's going to the Elite Eight.
Book it.
"Seriously though, how is michigan states inside play becasue the only real advantage ucl has over most teams is size and if they cant dominate the paint they struggle badly."
Not great. Draymond Green is a very solid player, and even at 6'5 260, he likes to face up from mid-range more than play down low. He operates much like Kevin Love did for you guys, but he's probably even more perimeter oriented. Other than him, Adreian Payne is raw down low and not someone you run offense through, and Derrick Nix is a big body who fouls. Delvon Roe is a workhorse who competes and can defend, but he's not going to score a bunch and he's a little foul prone.
I'll do a $15 pay-in league if we can get at least 10 guys.
We would have to send money to a PayPal account and people would have to trust me.
Believe me, I'll pay up, but it's always hard trusting people on anonymous forums, so we'll see who's down...
This is one of the worst seeding jobs in recent history. It seems like the committee decided to come up with a whole new way of selecting teams. They pretty much ignored the whole out of conference schedule and the full body of a team's resume or the very at least inconsistent in their ways in choosing teams Florida as a 2. I know they have many rpi 50 and 100 wins but their resume only deserved a 3-4 seed Richmond, Memphis and Utah state as 12. Does they mean they were right on the bubble? That's bull&$#%#&@!, the minimum seed shld have been at least at 10 for these guys USC as 11 and even in the tourney? Did the committee only start taking note of their games after jio fontan joined? I mean they lost to rider, tcu. And had a couple more bad losses. They were on the nit bubble for god'S sake, if they are in, then Alabama should have been in as well. And I would have chosen harvard over these two but the ivy league never gets any respect And colorado.. And virginia tech .... I have nothing else to say Plenty more that I disagree with as well
Who has Mich St beat exactly? I'll give them Purdue but Colorado has better wins then they do and they have bad loses. Its only because of who they are, that's why they are in.
Ohio St is gonna Blow out villanova if they even get past the first round.
When Duke lost to Va Tech i said they still weren't a lock even though Dickie V and knicks thought they were. They should have gotten in over VCU though
Greg Gumble bringing it to you raw. Ohio #1 overall!