[valentine]

Is anyone interested in helping me get accurate ratings and rosters for NBA 2K12? I want the rankings to be realistic and the players potential rating to be realistic.
In 2K11, the potential ratings were way off. I just want a realistic game, and with the new historic players,  I want to be able to put them into the Association, and
see what there stats would be against today’s players. Here is what I have in mind.

Michael Jordan
Wilt Chamberlain
Rating: 99

Larry Bird
Magic Johnson
Rating: 98

Bill Russell
Kareem
Rating: 97

Oscar Robertson
Shaquille O’Neal
Rating: 96

NBA Players

LeBron
Rating: 96
Potential: 83

D-Wade
Rating: 94
Potential: 78

Kobe
Rating: 94
Potential: 69

Dirk
Rating: 93
Potential: 70

Dwight
Rating: 92
Potential: 84

Durant
Rating: 91
Potential: 87

D-Rose
Rating: 90
Potential: 88

Young Players and Rookies
 
Blake Griffin
Rating: 86
Potential: 90

John Wall
Rating: 84
Potential: 92

Kyrie Irving
Rating: 73
Potential: 92

Derrick Williams
Rating: 73
Potential: 90

Enes Kanter
Rating: 70
Potential: 88

Tristan Thompson
Rating: 65
Potential: 95

Jonas Valanciunas
Rating: 69
Potential: 94

Jan Vesely
Rating: 69
Potential: 88

Bismack Biyombo
Rating: 60
Potential: 99

Brandon Knight
Rating: 69
Potential: 94

Kemba Walker
Rating: 70
Potential: 87

Jimmer Fredette
Rating: 69
Potential: 85

Klay Thompson
Rating: 68
Potential: 86

Alec Burks
Rating: 68
Potential: 89

Jeremy Tyler
Rating: 60
Potential: 96

[TRC1991Participant]

jeremy tyler more potential than blake griffin?

[TRC1991Participant]

jeremy tyler more potential than blake griffin?

[TRC1991Participant]

jeremy tyler more potential than blake griffin?

[DurantsWingspan]

I mean more potential to raise points in his overal ranking. At 86, Blake Griffin can not go up all that may points. 10 points and he would be best in the league. At a 60, if Tyler went up 10 points, it really wouldn’t even make him a solid starter. I think of potential for the game as how much a player’s rating can go up, because that is what makes it realistic for Association mode, but I see where you are coming from because Griffin does have more potential then Tyler. That is why Bismack has a high, high potential rating. He is also low. And I think potential goes down significantly each year as well. Griffin when he was a rookie before his injury I would say it was like a 98 and the next year like a 94 and this year a 90. And like John Wall 97 last year and 92 this year.

[DurantsWingspan]

I mean more potential to raise points in his overal ranking. At 86, Blake Griffin can not go up all that may points. 10 points and he would be best in the league. At a 60, if Tyler went up 10 points, it really wouldn’t even make him a solid starter. I think of potential for the game as how much a player’s rating can go up, because that is what makes it realistic for Association mode, but I see where you are coming from because Griffin does have more potential then Tyler. That is why Bismack has a high, high potential rating. He is also low. And I think potential goes down significantly each year as well. Griffin when he was a rookie before his injury I would say it was like a 98 and the next year like a 94 and this year a 90. And like John Wall 97 last year and 92 this year.

[DurantsWingspan]

I mean more potential to raise points in his overal ranking. At 86, Blake Griffin can not go up all that may points. 10 points and he would be best in the league. At a 60, if Tyler went up 10 points, it really wouldn’t even make him a solid starter. I think of potential for the game as how much a player’s rating can go up, because that is what makes it realistic for Association mode, but I see where you are coming from because Griffin does have more potential then Tyler. That is why Bismack has a high, high potential rating. He is also low. And I think potential goes down significantly each year as well. Griffin when he was a rookie before his injury I would say it was like a 98 and the next year like a 94 and this year a 90. And like John Wall 97 last year and 92 this year.

[DurantsWingspan]

If a few people want to do this with me, we can all say our opinions on a players rating and then average it out to get an unbiased opinion. It would work good to for uploading draft classes because we can all have a rating system on what we think players ratings will be when they are rookies. Maybe all the way up to Stephen Zimmerman’s class, atleast a few players from it to make it realistic. Maybe five to ten.

 

For instance:

Andre Drummond

Rating: 77

Potential:97

 

Shabazz Muhammad:

Rating: 77

Potential: 97

 

Jabari Parker

Rating: 76

Potential: 96

 

Andrew Wiggins

Rating: 75

Potential: 98

 

Stephen Zimmerman

Rating: 75

Potential: 96

[DurantsWingspan]

If a few people want to do this with me, we can all say our opinions on a players rating and then average it out to get an unbiased opinion. It would work good to for uploading draft classes because we can all have a rating system on what we think players ratings will be when they are rookies. Maybe all the way up to Stephen Zimmerman’s class, atleast a few players from it to make it realistic. Maybe five to ten.

 

For instance:

Andre Drummond

Rating: 77

Potential:97

 

Shabazz Muhammad:

Rating: 77

Potential: 97

 

Jabari Parker

Rating: 76

Potential: 96

 

Andrew Wiggins

Rating: 75

Potential: 98

 

Stephen Zimmerman

Rating: 75

Potential: 96

[DurantsWingspan]

If a few people want to do this with me, we can all say our opinions on a players rating and then average it out to get an unbiased opinion. It would work good to for uploading draft classes because we can all have a rating system on what we think players ratings will be when they are rookies. Maybe all the way up to Stephen Zimmerman’s class, atleast a few players from it to make it realistic. Maybe five to ten.

 

For instance:

Andre Drummond

Rating: 77

Potential:97

 

Shabazz Muhammad:

Rating: 77

Potential: 97

 

Jabari Parker

Rating: 76

Potential: 96

 

Andrew Wiggins

Rating: 75

Potential: 98

 

Stephen Zimmerman

Rating: 75

Potential: 96

[DurantsWingspan]

Name                   Position  Height  Weight  Rating  Potential  Shot Tendency

LeBron James            SF/PG    6’8    265    96    80    93
Dwight Howard            C    6’11    270    92    81    84
Dwyane Wade            SG/PG    6’4    220    94    74    94
Kobe Bryant            SG/SF    6’6    210    94    68    95
Chris Paul            PG    6’1    180    92    79    78
Kevin Durant            SF/SG    6’10    230    91    84    96
Derrick Rose            PG    6’3    195    90    85    94
Carmelo Anthony            SF    6’8    240    90    78    95
Blake Griffin            PF    6’10    255    85    88    82
Kevin Love            PF/C    6’10    265    84    83    79
Russell Westbrook        PG    6’3    200    85    85    83
Dirk Nowitzki            PF/C    7’0    250    93    69    91
Pau Gasol            PF/C    7’0    250    86    71    77
Amare Stoudemire        PF/C    6’10    250    87    74    88
Zach Randolph            PF/C    6’10    265    83    72    82
Tim Duncan             PF/C    7’0    265    86    63    75
Manu Ginobili            SG    6’5    210    81    70    77
LaMarcus Aldridge        PF/C    6’11    245    85    81    83
Kevin Martin            SG    6’6    185    79    78    87
Deron Williams            PG    6’2    200    90    76    82
Andrew Bynum            C    7’1    300    74    83    70
Steve Nash            PG    6’3    190    85    63    67
Al Horford            PF/C    6’10    250    81    74    65
Josh Smith            PF/SF    6’9    245    82    77    68
Joe Johnson            SG    6’7    240    82    69    77
Kevin Garnett            PF/C    6’11    255    81    64    67
Paul Pierce            SF    6’7    235    83    68    80
Rajon Rondo            PG    6’1    170    86    79    51
Ray Allen             SG    6’5    205    78    65    70
David West            PF    6’9    250    74    70    71
Nene                C    6’11    265    77    72    67
Tony Parker            PG    6’2    190    78    70    72
Al Jefferson            C/PF    6’10    275    77    78    78
Paul Millsap            PF    6’8    250    75    74    69
Lamar Odom            PF/SF    6’11    240    75    68    60
Stephen Curry            PG/SG    6’3    190    77    85    72
Monta Ellis            SG/PG    6’2    180    83    79    93
Chris Bosh            PF    6’11    235    86    78    76
Brook Lopez            C    7’0    260    78    82    75
Ryan Anderson            PF    6’11    230    68    81    70
Chris Andersen            C/PF    6’11    250    66    69    32
Ramon Sessions            PG    6’3    185    69    80    66
Lou Williams            PG/SG    6’2    180    71    74    77
Carlos Boozer            PF    6’9    260    80    72    75
Joakim Noah            C/PF    6’11    250    80    79    52
Chauncey Billups        PG    6’3    200    78    66    71
Elton Brand            PF    6’8    260    73    67    70
Eric Gordon            SG    6’3    210    80    86    86
Thaddeus Young            SF/PF    6’8    230    71    85    66
Rodney Stuckey            PG/SG    6’4    200    73    79    77
Tyson Chandler            C    7’1    250    72    69    52
Luis Scola            PF    6’9    250    75    71    67
Tony Allen            SG/SF    6’5    220    67    72    51
Tyrus Thomas            PF    6’9    225    69    81    68
Chris Wilcox            C/PF    6’10    265    66    69    52
Greg Monroe            C/PF    6’11    250    70    88    59
Ty Lawson            PG    5’11    190    73    81    70
Andre Miller            PG    6’1    200    72    67    66
Kris Humphries            PF    6’10    250    69    80    55
Danny Granger            SF    6’8    225    80    76    82
Andre Igoudala            SF/SG    6’6    215    82    77    64
Rudy Gay            SF/SG    6’8    220    81    83    78
Serge Ibaka            PF/C    6’10    245    73    87    48
James Harden            SG/PG    6’5    210    76    86    74

[DurantsWingspan]

Name                   Position  Height  Weight  Rating  Potential  Shot Tendency

LeBron James            SF/PG    6’8    265    96    80    93
Dwight Howard            C    6’11    270    92    81    84
Dwyane Wade            SG/PG    6’4    220    94    74    94
Kobe Bryant            SG/SF    6’6    210    94    68    95
Chris Paul            PG    6’1    180    92    79    78
Kevin Durant            SF/SG    6’10    230    91    84    96
Derrick Rose            PG    6’3    195    90    85    94
Carmelo Anthony            SF    6’8    240    90    78    95
Blake Griffin            PF    6’10    255    85    88    82
Kevin Love            PF/C    6’10    265    84    83    79
Russell Westbrook        PG    6’3    200    85    85    83
Dirk Nowitzki            PF/C    7’0    250    93    69    91
Pau Gasol            PF/C    7’0    250    86    71    77
Amare Stoudemire        PF/C    6’10    250    87    74    88
Zach Randolph            PF/C    6’10    265    83    72    82
Tim Duncan             PF/C    7’0    265    86    63    75
Manu Ginobili            SG    6’5    210    81    70    77
LaMarcus Aldridge        PF/C    6’11    245    85    81    83
Kevin Martin            SG    6’6    185    79    78    87
Deron Williams            PG    6’2    200    90    76    82
Andrew Bynum            C    7’1    300    74    83    70
Steve Nash            PG    6’3    190    85    63    67
Al Horford            PF/C    6’10    250    81    74    65
Josh Smith            PF/SF    6’9    245    82    77    68
Joe Johnson            SG    6’7    240    82    69    77
Kevin Garnett            PF/C    6’11    255    81    64    67
Paul Pierce            SF    6’7    235    83    68    80
Rajon Rondo            PG    6’1    170    86    79    51
Ray Allen             SG    6’5    205    78    65    70
David West            PF    6’9    250    74    70    71
Nene                C    6’11    265    77    72    67
Tony Parker            PG    6’2    190    78    70    72
Al Jefferson            C/PF    6’10    275    77    78    78
Paul Millsap            PF    6’8    250    75    74    69
Lamar Odom            PF/SF    6’11    240    75    68    60
Stephen Curry            PG/SG    6’3    190    77    85    72
Monta Ellis            SG/PG    6’2    180    83    79    93
Chris Bosh            PF    6’11    235    86    78    76
Brook Lopez            C    7’0    260    78    82    75
Ryan Anderson            PF    6’11    230    68    81    70
Chris Andersen            C/PF    6’11    250    66    69    32
Ramon Sessions            PG    6’3    185    69    80    66
Lou Williams            PG/SG    6’2    180    71    74    77
Carlos Boozer            PF    6’9    260    80    72    75
Joakim Noah            C/PF    6’11    250    80    79    52
Chauncey Billups        PG    6’3    200    78    66    71
Elton Brand            PF    6’8    260    73    67    70
Eric Gordon            SG    6’3    210    80    86    86
Thaddeus Young            SF/PF    6’8    230    71    85    66
Rodney Stuckey            PG/SG    6’4    200    73    79    77
Tyson Chandler            C    7’1    250    72    69    52
Luis Scola            PF    6’9    250    75    71    67
Tony Allen            SG/SF    6’5    220    67    72    51
Tyrus Thomas            PF    6’9    225    69    81    68
Chris Wilcox            C/PF    6’10    265    66    69    52
Greg Monroe            C/PF    6’11    250    70    88    59
Ty Lawson            PG    5’11    190    73    81    70
Andre Miller            PG    6’1    200    72    67    66
Kris Humphries            PF    6’10    250    69    80    55
Danny Granger            SF    6’8    225    80    76    82
Andre Igoudala            SF/SG    6’6    215    82    77    64
Rudy Gay            SF/SG    6’8    220    81    83    78
Serge Ibaka            PF/C    6’10    245    73    87    48
James Harden            SG/PG    6’5    210    76    86    74

[DurantsWingspan]

Name                   Position  Height  Weight  Rating  Potential  Shot Tendency

LeBron James            SF/PG    6’8    265    96    80    93
Dwight Howard            C    6’11    270    92    81    84
Dwyane Wade            SG/PG    6’4    220    94    74    94
Kobe Bryant            SG/SF    6’6    210    94    68    95
Chris Paul            PG    6’1    180    92    79    78
Kevin Durant            SF/SG    6’10    230    91    84    96
Derrick Rose            PG    6’3    195    90    85    94
Carmelo Anthony            SF    6’8    240    90    78    95
Blake Griffin            PF    6’10    255    85    88    82
Kevin Love            PF/C    6’10    265    84    83    79
Russell Westbrook        PG    6’3    200    85    85    83
Dirk Nowitzki            PF/C    7’0    250    93    69    91
Pau Gasol            PF/C    7’0    250    86    71    77
Amare Stoudemire        PF/C    6’10    250    87    74    88
Zach Randolph            PF/C    6’10    265    83    72    82
Tim Duncan             PF/C    7’0    265    86    63    75
Manu Ginobili            SG    6’5    210    81    70    77
LaMarcus Aldridge        PF/C    6’11    245    85    81    83
Kevin Martin            SG    6’6    185    79    78    87
Deron Williams            PG    6’2    200    90    76    82
Andrew Bynum            C    7’1    300    74    83    70
Steve Nash            PG    6’3    190    85    63    67
Al Horford            PF/C    6’10    250    81    74    65
Josh Smith            PF/SF    6’9    245    82    77    68
Joe Johnson            SG    6’7    240    82    69    77
Kevin Garnett            PF/C    6’11    255    81    64    67
Paul Pierce            SF    6’7    235    83    68    80
Rajon Rondo            PG    6’1    170    86    79    51
Ray Allen             SG    6’5    205    78    65    70
David West            PF    6’9    250    74    70    71
Nene                C    6’11    265    77    72    67
Tony Parker            PG    6’2    190    78    70    72
Al Jefferson            C/PF    6’10    275    77    78    78
Paul Millsap            PF    6’8    250    75    74    69
Lamar Odom            PF/SF    6’11    240    75    68    60
Stephen Curry            PG/SG    6’3    190    77    85    72
Monta Ellis            SG/PG    6’2    180    83    79    93
Chris Bosh            PF    6’11    235    86    78    76
Brook Lopez            C    7’0    260    78    82    75
Ryan Anderson            PF    6’11    230    68    81    70
Chris Andersen            C/PF    6’11    250    66    69    32
Ramon Sessions            PG    6’3    185    69    80    66
Lou Williams            PG/SG    6’2    180    71    74    77
Carlos Boozer            PF    6’9    260    80    72    75
Joakim Noah            C/PF    6’11    250    80    79    52
Chauncey Billups        PG    6’3    200    78    66    71
Elton Brand            PF    6’8    260    73    67    70
Eric Gordon            SG    6’3    210    80    86    86
Thaddeus Young            SF/PF    6’8    230    71    85    66
Rodney Stuckey            PG/SG    6’4    200    73    79    77
Tyson Chandler            C    7’1    250    72    69    52
Luis Scola            PF    6’9    250    75    71    67
Tony Allen            SG/SF    6’5    220    67    72    51
Tyrus Thomas            PF    6’9    225    69    81    68
Chris Wilcox            C/PF    6’10    265    66    69    52
Greg Monroe            C/PF    6’11    250    70    88    59
Ty Lawson            PG    5’11    190    73    81    70
Andre Miller            PG    6’1    200    72    67    66
Kris Humphries            PF    6’10    250    69    80    55
Danny Granger            SF    6’8    225    80    76    82
Andre Igoudala            SF/SG    6’6    215    82    77    64
Rudy Gay            SF/SG    6’8    220    81    83    78
Serge Ibaka            PF/C    6’10    245    73    87    48
James Harden            SG/PG    6’5    210    76    86    74

[providencefriars1Participant]

If you are going to go in and change every NBA players ratings, or even the good players, you have waaaaay too much time on your hands.

[providencefriars1Participant]

If you are going to go in and change every NBA players ratings, or even the good players, you have waaaaay too much time on your hands.

[providencefriars1Participant]

If you are going to go in and change every NBA players ratings, or even the good players, you have waaaaay too much time on your hands.

[mikeyvthedonParticipant]

In past years of games, I actually find that if you find the right balance of where you project a player to go, as far as potential, than 2k does a great job. The thing with potential ratings in the game, is that they effect how a players career plays out. Hence, older players still have very high potential. Once a player gets to a certain age, they will still decline regardless, potential is more so effecting how good a player can become and the production hence forth.

Here are the rankings from last year, if you were to start an Association without changing any of the ratings (Living Rosters, as of when I made the post):

http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/how-nba2k11-rates-nba

Outside of Dirk Nowitzki being 22nd and Pau Gasol being 10th, they are really not that bad. The ratings you gave are not horrible, but your potential ratings are. You can dip them slightly, but realize that if Kobe or Dirk has a 99 in potential, it does not mean they are getting better, it just shows how their careers will progress. Same goes for every other player. It is why Shaq still had a 99 potential.

The cool thing about 2k11, that I find different from Live, is that they explain what every rating represents. I think a lot of people miss out on these descriptions, thus thinking the rating is ridiculous. I wish that there was an easier way of seeing the average ratings per position, maybe even having templates that show a positions average rating while you are adjusting them. This would be incredibly helpful for draft classes, as I find a lot of people who tend to create them have no real concept of where a player ranks in this category amongst position.

My bottom line is, the reason most of your ratings seem kind of crazy is that they lack the concept of what potential actually does to players. If you play an Association, the odds are that players potential ratings go up, I guess that is done through the off-season camps that are probably not visible to you. I also have found that if a player is given a certain amount of potential, the odds are, they will peak at that level (if John Wall stays at 92, he will not get past a 92, if that, unless his potential rises). So, Biyombo, a 99, is insane. Yes, he more than likely will not become a 99, but he is not going to rise at that rate.

What I have tried to do was form templates and averages for players. This was a long, boring process and a general waste of a few days. I am pretty much sorry I did it, but if you want it to be "realistic", than having a bunch of guys in this years draft class have potential above 90 would not be a way to do it. 2k luckily realizes that a players "potential", is not strictly based on age, but on where and in what way a player will develop. So, if you are indeed trying to make the game as realistic as possible, really read the descriptions and take into the averages per position of each rating. If you use the ratings you have suggested, the odds of the game being "realistic", decrease dramatically.

 

 

 

[mikeyvthedonParticipant]

In past years of games, I actually find that if you find the right balance of where you project a player to go, as far as potential, than 2k does a great job. The thing with potential ratings in the game, is that they effect how a players career plays out. Hence, older players still have very high potential. Once a player gets to a certain age, they will still decline regardless, potential is more so effecting how good a player can become and the production hence forth.

Here are the rankings from last year, if you were to start an Association without changing any of the ratings (Living Rosters, as of when I made the post):

http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/how-nba2k11-rates-nba

Outside of Dirk Nowitzki being 22nd and Pau Gasol being 10th, they are really not that bad. The ratings you gave are not horrible, but your potential ratings are. You can dip them slightly, but realize that if Kobe or Dirk has a 99 in potential, it does not mean they are getting better, it just shows how their careers will progress. Same goes for every other player. It is why Shaq still had a 99 potential.

The cool thing about 2k11, that I find different from Live, is that they explain what every rating represents. I think a lot of people miss out on these descriptions, thus thinking the rating is ridiculous. I wish that there was an easier way of seeing the average ratings per position, maybe even having templates that show a positions average rating while you are adjusting them. This would be incredibly helpful for draft classes, as I find a lot of people who tend to create them have no real concept of where a player ranks in this category amongst position.

My bottom line is, the reason most of your ratings seem kind of crazy is that they lack the concept of what potential actually does to players. If you play an Association, the odds are that players potential ratings go up, I guess that is done through the off-season camps that are probably not visible to you. I also have found that if a player is given a certain amount of potential, the odds are, they will peak at that level (if John Wall stays at 92, he will not get past a 92, if that, unless his potential rises). So, Biyombo, a 99, is insane. Yes, he more than likely will not become a 99, but he is not going to rise at that rate.

What I have tried to do was form templates and averages for players. This was a long, boring process and a general waste of a few days. I am pretty much sorry I did it, but if you want it to be "realistic", than having a bunch of guys in this years draft class have potential above 90 would not be a way to do it. 2k luckily realizes that a players "potential", is not strictly based on age, but on where and in what way a player will develop. So, if you are indeed trying to make the game as realistic as possible, really read the descriptions and take into the averages per position of each rating. If you use the ratings you have suggested, the odds of the game being "realistic", decrease dramatically.

 

 

 

[mikeyvthedonParticipant]

In past years of games, I actually find that if you find the right balance of where you project a player to go, as far as potential, than 2k does a great job. The thing with potential ratings in the game, is that they effect how a players career plays out. Hence, older players still have very high potential. Once a player gets to a certain age, they will still decline regardless, potential is more so effecting how good a player can become and the production hence forth.

Here are the rankings from last year, if you were to start an Association without changing any of the ratings (Living Rosters, as of when I made the post):

http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/how-nba2k11-rates-nba

Outside of Dirk Nowitzki being 22nd and Pau Gasol being 10th, they are really not that bad. The ratings you gave are not horrible, but your potential ratings are. You can dip them slightly, but realize that if Kobe or Dirk has a 99 in potential, it does not mean they are getting better, it just shows how their careers will progress. Same goes for every other player. It is why Shaq still had a 99 potential.

The cool thing about 2k11, that I find different from Live, is that they explain what every rating represents. I think a lot of people miss out on these descriptions, thus thinking the rating is ridiculous. I wish that there was an easier way of seeing the average ratings per position, maybe even having templates that show a positions average rating while you are adjusting them. This would be incredibly helpful for draft classes, as I find a lot of people who tend to create them have no real concept of where a player ranks in this category amongst position.

My bottom line is, the reason most of your ratings seem kind of crazy is that they lack the concept of what potential actually does to players. If you play an Association, the odds are that players potential ratings go up, I guess that is done through the off-season camps that are probably not visible to you. I also have found that if a player is given a certain amount of potential, the odds are, they will peak at that level (if John Wall stays at 92, he will not get past a 92, if that, unless his potential rises). So, Biyombo, a 99, is insane. Yes, he more than likely will not become a 99, but he is not going to rise at that rate.

What I have tried to do was form templates and averages for players. This was a long, boring process and a general waste of a few days. I am pretty much sorry I did it, but if you want it to be "realistic", than having a bunch of guys in this years draft class have potential above 90 would not be a way to do it. 2k luckily realizes that a players "potential", is not strictly based on age, but on where and in what way a player will develop. So, if you are indeed trying to make the game as realistic as possible, really read the descriptions and take into the averages per position of each rating. If you use the ratings you have suggested, the odds of the game being "realistic", decrease dramatically.

 

 

 

[McDunkin]

So by not making 100 potential available…They are admitting in advance that Chu Chu Maduabum wont be accurate.

 

"Come on Son"

[McDunkin]

So by not making 100 potential available…They are admitting in advance that Chu Chu Maduabum wont be accurate.

 

"Come on Son"

[McDunkin]

So by not making 100 potential available…They are admitting in advance that Chu Chu Maduabum wont be accurate.

 

"Come on Son"

[yellowdunkerParticipant]

 D.Rose Mvp gets a 90 rating and at the age of 23 only an 88 for potential…?

[yellowdunkerParticipant]

 D.Rose Mvp gets a 90 rating and at the age of 23 only an 88 for potential…?

[yellowdunkerParticipant]

 D.Rose Mvp gets a 90 rating and at the age of 23 only an 88 for potential…?

[Jayhawks2011Participant]

i’m pretty sure potential is the best ability a player can get to. for instance if you are a 80 and have a 90 potential the best you can be is a 90.  so if you are above like a 95 and your potential is 85 in a few years you will start to regress towards and 85

[Jayhawks2011Participant]

i’m pretty sure potential is the best ability a player can get to. for instance if you are a 80 and have a 90 potential the best you can be is a 90.  so if you are above like a 95 and your potential is 85 in a few years you will start to regress towards and 85

[Jayhawks2011Participant]

i’m pretty sure potential is the best ability a player can get to. for instance if you are a 80 and have a 90 potential the best you can be is a 90.  so if you are above like a 95 and your potential is 85 in a few years you will start to regress towards and 85

[torontoraptors10Participant]

Bismack Biyombo has a 99 potential? In NBA 2K11, I’ve drafted similar players in my association (from the downloadable drafts) and they would usually get 4ppg but like 12rpg. I think he is going to turn out like one of those players in NBA 2K12

[torontoraptors10Participant]

Bismack Biyombo has a 99 potential? In NBA 2K11, I’ve drafted similar players in my association (from the downloadable drafts) and they would usually get 4ppg but like 12rpg. I think he is going to turn out like one of those players in NBA 2K12

[torontoraptors10Participant]

Bismack Biyombo has a 99 potential? In NBA 2K11, I’ve drafted similar players in my association (from the downloadable drafts) and they would usually get 4ppg but like 12rpg. I think he is going to turn out like one of those players in NBA 2K12

[Author]

Posts