This topic contains 11 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by BucksRUS 13 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sun, 05/23/2010 - 1:58pm #16046
SwatLakeCityParticipantI am having trouble posting my mock to a thread so I am doing it through a friends’ account. (this is actually wesleymatthews23’s mock, so don’t let the name fool you.
http://www.nbadraft.net/nba_mock_drafts/comments/371290 - Posted on: Sun, 05/23/2010 - 2:01pm #319886
SwatLakeCityParticipantwesleymatthews 23 has made some pretty bold picks. This is smart because players with a lot of upside always go higher then they should. Anyone too high or too low?
0 - Posted on: Sun, 05/23/2010 - 2:01pm #319887
SwatLakeCityParticipantwesleymatthews 23 has made some pretty bold picks. This is smart because players with a lot of upside always go higher then they should. Anyone too high or too low?
0 - Posted on: Sun, 05/23/2010 - 2:07pm #319891
jjpn73Participanthow do u edit your mock? it wont let me change my picks
0 - Posted on: Sun, 05/23/2010 - 2:14pm #319895
wesleymatthews23ParticipantI just moved the guys where they should go. Make sure you do not use the back buttons to go back and forth between the comment page and the edit page. Use the links provided. If that doesn’t work out then try making your problem a thread. That might get Aran and Joseph to fix the problem.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 05/23/2010 - 2:15pm #319897
wesleymatthews23ParticipantWhat do you think of my mock?
0 - Posted on: Sun, 05/23/2010 - 7:48pm #320015
sheltwon3Participant - Posted on: Sun, 05/23/2010 - 7:51pm #320017
sheltwon3ParticipantI see you are not high on Favors and also I doubt my team New Orleans would take a power forward unless it was top 5 talent and I think they want more of a banger type anyway. Whiteside who is similiar to Chandler in build and length and athleticism makes more sense or they could go with a sg or small forward. Power forward is not really a need for the Hornets.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 05/24/2010 - 5:34am #320142
kaceyParticipantnbadraft.net/nba_mock_drafts/29512/2010
Looks like you need to update it.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 05/24/2010 - 6:14am #320158
wesleymatthews23ParticipantSheltwon, do you think that the Hornets could go for Henry. I’ve noticed that the Hornets always go for best available not necessarily for need. I did not put Whiteside there because The raptors need someone with a lot of potential to replace Bosh. I see Bargnani as more of a PF not a C. So Whiteside would cause that too happen. Maybe the Hornets could trade David West for a Center and then move Okafor to the PF.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 05/24/2010 - 6:16am #320159
wesleymatthews23ParticipantSheltwon how do you imagine Patterson to the Warriors. Isn’t that a little high for him. Please back that up.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 05/24/2010 - 7:56am #320187
BucksRUSParticipantwesleymatthews 23 mock is interesting. I don’t see Monroe going that high. Favors fits better in NJ.
For the Bucks, 2 PFs and a Center? I agree that Patterson will be the pick if he is there and George is not. I am not seeing the Lawal pick especially after picking Patterson in the First. Jordan Crawford would be the pick at 37 over Lawal. If the Bucks go for a center in the second round Art Parkhouski who you still have available at 47 would be the selection.
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |