[Lotto StudParticipant]

 Best fit for his projected range?

[220Participant]

 On paper Bridges has the kind of game any team can make use of. 

[ChewyParticipant]

 Behind Bagley, Doncic, and Porter.

Ahead of Miles, Walker, and Trent Jr.

Not sure between him and Knox. Right now I slightly lean towards Knox.

 

 

[OhCanada-Participant]

I agree Bridges and Knox stock are very close. A rebuilding team will likely lean towards Knox while a competitive team will likely go with Bridges.

[BeardedDragon84Participant]

I think he’ll end up in Philly, and he’s the perfect fit for their team, but they’re probably not the best fit for him becoming a star. He’ll be great for them tho.

[BeastMode716Participant]

 Super long wing span, 3pt shooter – beautiful form, high elevation & extension – can attack the Rim, great cutter b/c he moves os well w/o the ball 

Plays strong fundamentally sound perimeter defense which is So hard to find & Bridges does not Ever engage in Iso action. 

He moves w/o the ball to work for an open 3, a back door cut & when he recieves the pass he is prepared to shoot Immediately – the guy is at the Rim or behind the 3pt line & nothing in between & that is Exactly what you want at Both ends from your 3&D Wing in the modern game 

Bridges really would fit w/ Anyone but b/c he’s projected to go 10th he might go to a good team – I don’t see Bridges as a "Star" but that’s fine b/c Every player on your roster can’t be a Star & this kid would be a Great piece as a rotation player early & eventually a Big time Starter on a Competing team

 

 

 

[Memphis MadnessParticipant]

 I have Mikal Bridges at 5. 

If he REALLY impresses at the combine, and has some great workouts, showing more of an in-between game with more of an alpha/mean streak, then I think he moves up to 3.

 

[Robb_CParticipant]

 Mikal Bridges reminds me a lot of another Villanova product.. Kerry Kittles

His potential is capped but thats not a bad thing, I believe his game translates very well at the next level, You could run him in multiple different sets and he would be efficient in most of them..

I personally dont see him in top 3 due to his limited potential, Hes not a go to guy but hes going to be a very serviceable bail out player when an offense becomes stale or in transition when your lead guy is being shadowed..

I see him in the 6-10 range, Jerry West wont let him slip past the lotto imo.

 

  

 

[whiteflashParticipant]

 That’s interesting, ’cause I see a bit of Eddie Jones in him. 

[Robb_CParticipant]

Eddie Jones? Jones is a better ball handler.. Mikal is a bit capped offensively due to this. Jones way better in Iso situations.. 

[kobyzParticipant]

sean elliott is best comparison!

[Author]

Posts