This topic contains 28 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by 
Mopgrass 7 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 7:40am #63688
ChicagoCaseyParticipantIt looks like these three have won the physical measutments part of the combine w/ Chriss measuring at 6’10" w/s 6’8.75" w/o 233 IBS and a 7’0.25" WS. Ellenson measuring in at 6’11.5" w/s 6’10" w/o 242 IBS and a 7’2.25" WS. And Davis measuring in at 6’10.5" w/s 6’9.25" w/o 237 IBS and a 7’2.5" WS.
I never knew Ellenson was that tall and Chriss was that tall. I could see Chriss going higher given his measurments.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 7:41am #1061429
- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 7:41am #1061551
- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 7:43am #1061431
ChicagoCaseyParticipantWade Baldwin measuring in a 6’4" in shoes and a MONSTER 6’11.25" wingspan
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 7:43am #1061553
ChicagoCaseyParticipantWade Baldwin measuring in a 6’4" in shoes and a MONSTER 6’11.25" wingspan
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 7:47am #1061433
GBeeParticipantI wouldn’t call Chriss a winner especially since he measured out poorly in the most important measurement for a big which is standing reach. 8’9 is below average for a PF.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 7:47am #1061555
GBeeParticipantI wouldn’t call Chriss a winner especially since he measured out poorly in the most important measurement for a big which is standing reach. 8’9 is below average for a PF.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:14am #1061447
Magic JordanParticipantThe real winner is Zhou Qi.
Poeltl with only an 8’9.5" standing reach? How is that even possible for someone as tall as him. That is terrible.
0- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:24am #1061462
GBeeParticipantCould be low set (but wide) or sloping shoulders,
Poeltl never looked like he had great length. His defensive potential comes from his agility, energy, intelligence and potential to defend in space, not his potential as a rim protector. A little disappointing, but I don’t think this impacts his stock much at all.
Skal had an equally terrible standing reach, but that was more predictable if you just look at his body structure. He has those aforementioned sloped shoulders…narrow too.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:24am #1061583
GBeeParticipantCould be low set (but wide) or sloping shoulders,
Poeltl never looked like he had great length. His defensive potential comes from his agility, energy, intelligence and potential to defend in space, not his potential as a rim protector. A little disappointing, but I don’t think this impacts his stock much at all.
Skal had an equally terrible standing reach, but that was more predictable if you just look at his body structure. He has those aforementioned sloped shoulders…narrow too.
0
- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:14am #1061569
Magic JordanParticipantThe real winner is Zhou Qi.
Poeltl with only an 8’9.5" standing reach? How is that even possible for someone as tall as him. That is terrible.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:19am #1061455
giddyup123ParticipantNo big suprises aside from Ellenson’s size to me.
Also… don’t like think he is good enough to get significant minutes in the NBA next year (though the potential is there), but got to imagine Malachi Richardson is another big winner. Legit SG size at 6’6 with a 7 foot wingspan with big hands.
Buddy Hield also measured better than I expected.. 6’5 w/ a 6’9+ wingspan should cement a top 7 selection.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:19am #1061577
giddyup123ParticipantNo big suprises aside from Ellenson’s size to me.
Also… don’t like think he is good enough to get significant minutes in the NBA next year (though the potential is there), but got to imagine Malachi Richardson is another big winner. Legit SG size at 6’6 with a 7 foot wingspan with big hands.
Buddy Hield also measured better than I expected.. 6’5 w/ a 6’9+ wingspan should cement a top 7 selection.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:34am #1061466
Arc12345ParticipantThat’s a pretty massive wingspan (7’3) for a guy who’s not even 6’7 (6’6.75) barefoot. He’s really skilled, I think he should get drafted.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:34am #1061587
Arc12345ParticipantThat’s a pretty massive wingspan (7’3) for a guy who’s not even 6’7 (6’6.75) barefoot. He’s really skilled, I think he should get drafted.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:36am #1061468
XavierAllTheWayParticipantBaldwin…doesn’t not matter if measurements are great when he sucked the whole year
0- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 9:11am #1061474
mamadouParticipantYeah he sucked all year at 14+ 5+ 4 + playing 30 mins as a very young sophomore and learning the PG spot.
6 FTA per game, 42% 3 pts shooter in his college career and great measurements.
It doesn’t matter.
Surprised by Chriss, i thought he was a 6’8.5 in shoes with a 6’11 wingspan.
6’10 with his guard skills, shooting abilities, athleticism cement him as PF, shorter he could have been viewed as a pure tweener.
Brice Johnson, i thought he was 6’9 in shoes, good for him.
My men Layman is tall, but no surprise with his japanese wingspan.
Thon Maker with KG measurements i guess.
0- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 10:04pm #1061671
MopgrassParticipantMaker had the 2nd best standing reach in the whole combine… though that may be commentary on how the NBA is getting away from super size and toward agility. He’s a winner at the combine because it puts to bed the weird rumor about him having small hands. Among the centers at the combine, his hand size pretty dead average. who makes that kind of stuff up to begin with?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 10:04pm #1061793
MopgrassParticipantMaker had the 2nd best standing reach in the whole combine… though that may be commentary on how the NBA is getting away from super size and toward agility. He’s a winner at the combine because it puts to bed the weird rumor about him having small hands. Among the centers at the combine, his hand size pretty dead average. who makes that kind of stuff up to begin with?
0
- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 9:11am #1061595
mamadouParticipantYeah he sucked all year at 14+ 5+ 4 + playing 30 mins as a very young sophomore and learning the PG spot.
6 FTA per game, 42% 3 pts shooter in his college career and great measurements.
It doesn’t matter.
Surprised by Chriss, i thought he was a 6’8.5 in shoes with a 6’11 wingspan.
6’10 with his guard skills, shooting abilities, athleticism cement him as PF, shorter he could have been viewed as a pure tweener.
Brice Johnson, i thought he was 6’9 in shoes, good for him.
My men Layman is tall, but no surprise with his japanese wingspan.
Thon Maker with KG measurements i guess.
0
- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 8:36am #1061589
XavierAllTheWayParticipantBaldwin…doesn’t not matter if measurements are great when he sucked the whole year
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 11:53am #1061652
XavierAllTheWayParticipantLol 14-5-5 stat line for ballon is supposed to be impressive? How many players average that and more???? Plenty! I watch him atleast 5 times and whenever his teams really need a basket, he does nothing to create opportunities for his teammates or himself. Instead he just dribbles on the perimeter and then laugh 3 point shots. Yes, his measureables are great, but better improve his handle and shooting if he wants to do something. Early second round is where he belongs
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 11:53am #1061530
XavierAllTheWayParticipantLol 14-5-5 stat line for ballon is supposed to be impressive? How many players average that and more???? Plenty! I watch him atleast 5 times and whenever his teams really need a basket, he does nothing to create opportunities for his teammates or himself. Instead he just dribbles on the perimeter and then laugh 3 point shots. Yes, his measureables are great, but better improve his handle and shooting if he wants to do something. Early second round is where he belongs
0- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 2:34pm #1061686
mamadouParticipantHe wasn’t a PG a year ago, so yeah 5+ assists in 30 mins is a pretty solid start for a young sophomore…as are his 6 FTA, his shooting stroke, his length, his defensive potential, his versatility as a lead guard or off guard and his dabs during a fight….
His shooting is more than fine, effortless, he needs to improve his decision making and ball handling, just like every other 20YO guard…
He’s 4th in assists in nba prospects, he’s the youngest of the 4, played the least of the 4, best shooter of the 4, so many knock on him,
Man, George Hill is a starting PG in this league, he’s 30.
Beverley, Chalmers, remember me the name of the bucks PG ?, jazz PG ?, who’s the PG for the lakers ? Knicks ?, Nets ?
Who’s the back up of the great and reliable derrick rose ?, reggie jackson ?.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 2:34pm #1061564
mamadouParticipantHe wasn’t a PG a year ago, so yeah 5+ assists in 30 mins is a pretty solid start for a young sophomore…as are his 6 FTA, his shooting stroke, his length, his defensive potential, his versatility as a lead guard or off guard and his dabs during a fight….
His shooting is more than fine, effortless, he needs to improve his decision making and ball handling, just like every other 20YO guard…
He’s 4th in assists in nba prospects, he’s the youngest of the 4, played the least of the 4, best shooter of the 4, so many knock on him,
Man, George Hill is a starting PG in this league, he’s 30.
Beverley, Chalmers, remember me the name of the bucks PG ?, jazz PG ?, who’s the PG for the lakers ? Knicks ?, Nets ?
Who’s the back up of the great and reliable derrick rose ?, reggie jackson ?.
0
- Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 2:44pm #1061694
nill650Participantbaldwin could go as high as 25 some think higher.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/12/2016 - 2:44pm #1061572
nill650Participantbaldwin could go as high as 25 some think higher.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |