This topic contains 17 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by JNixon 13 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 8:24am #21623
valentine1.duke
2.purdue
3.Michigan state
4.kstate
5.Pitt
6.unc
7.Ohio st
8.butler
9.Illinois
10.Washington
11.Florida
12.Tennessee
13.villanova
14.Kentucky
15.Baylor
16.gonzaga
17.Kansas
18. Va tech
19.west va
20.Texas
21.Syracuse
22.san diego st
23.Georgia
24.temple
25.byu34.Memphis
36.ucla-the bruins will prove last season was nothing more than an aberration
39.Maryland-soph Jordan Williams will be the next all American terp0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 8:42am #402478
JNixonParticipantButler is pretty high there
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 8:42am #402495
JNixonParticipantButler is pretty high there
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 8:53am #402488
stanford hoopsYea I noticed I agree though because they should kill there conference and before haywards breakout year Matt Howard was player of the year and reports are shelvn Mack is a first rounder after balling this summer
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 8:53am #402505
stanford hoopsYea I noticed I agree though because they should kill there conference and before haywards breakout year Matt Howard was player of the year and reports are shelvn Mack is a first rounder after balling this summer
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 9:05am #402500
OhCanada-ParticipantWhere is North Carolina, they did get the number #1 freshman. Doesnt that count for anything?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 9:05am #402517
OhCanada-ParticipantWhere is North Carolina, they did get the number #1 freshman. Doesnt that count for anything?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 9:08am #402506
JNixonParticipantThey are also ranked too high. At #6
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 9:08am #402523
JNixonParticipantThey are also ranked too high. At #6
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 9:19am #402514
knicksfan7Participantthe tidbit on Jordan Williams, they don’t mean this year do they?? If they do I think that is to early, I could see him being an All-American his junior year, but I don’t think he will do it until his senior year. I am a big Jordan Williams fan, but the loss of Vasquez, Hayes, and Milbourne will make him take a greater role which will take him a while to adjust to. Hopefully the incoming guard play is solid because Williams needs solid to great guard play in order for him to be the best player that he can be.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 9:19am #402531
knicksfan7Participantthe tidbit on Jordan Williams, they don’t mean this year do they?? If they do I think that is to early, I could see him being an All-American his junior year, but I don’t think he will do it until his senior year. I am a big Jordan Williams fan, but the loss of Vasquez, Hayes, and Milbourne will make him take a greater role which will take him a while to adjust to. Hopefully the incoming guard play is solid because Williams needs solid to great guard play in order for him to be the best player that he can be.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 9:55am #402540
stanford hoopsNo it’s not for this year for Williams
I can understand unc because Henson will be bigger and better. Zeller is nice if healthy and barnes is barnes. Plus history shows unc bounces backPAC-10 write up
“will take you by suprise
Stanford may have gotten a major steal with Josh huestis. At 6-8 he has the ability to play in the post but is also skilled enough to be on the wing. Huestis saw his stock rise late and had the recruiting process been longer, it would nit have been a surprise to see the entire Pac-10 recruit him0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 9:55am #402557
stanford hoopsNo it’s not for this year for Williams
I can understand unc because Henson will be bigger and better. Zeller is nice if healthy and barnes is barnes. Plus history shows unc bounces backPAC-10 write up
“will take you by suprise
Stanford may have gotten a major steal with Josh huestis. At 6-8 he has the ability to play in the post but is also skilled enough to be on the wing. Huestis saw his stock rise late and had the recruiting process been longer, it would nit have been a surprise to see the entire Pac-10 recruit him0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 1:23pm #402928
hiphopismylifeParticipantYeah im not so sure about Butler or Carolina that high. Im all about the heels but they have alot to prove. Butler will have a chance to maintain that though because of their conference.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/16/2010 - 1:23pm #402933
hiphopismylifeParticipantYeah im not so sure about Butler or Carolina that high. Im all about the heels but they have alot to prove. Butler will have a chance to maintain that though because of their conference.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/17/2010 - 8:15am #403617
stanford hoopsOne thing I liked about Jordan Williams. He’s alot like Lonnie Baxter because he can create his own offense without a guard having to Set him up
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/17/2010 - 8:42am #403623
McWinningParticipantI still think without Mitchell Missouri is a top 25 team.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/17/2010 - 9:03am #403626
JNixonParticipantOh yeah. Mizzou isn’t there either. I think Mizzou will be a Sweet 16 or Elite 8 team next year, with or without Mitchell.
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |