This topic contains 14 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar SmooveKRYPT 10 years, 11 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #49456
    AvatarAvatar
    RMolloy24
    Participant

    Two pretty similar players. Both known for hustle, defense and their elite athleticism. Would love if the Celtics could pick him up in the Draft with the 16th pick.

    0
  • #784993
    AvatarAvatar
    The Q
    Participant

    I’m a big franklin fan, but not sure he’s a Jimmy Butler type.

    Butler had one really good 3pt shooting year at Marquette as a Jr. and then fell off a cliff his sr. year.

    I soured on him a bit after that, and it was a mistake. But Franklin just has never shown that kind of shooting ability.

    all that said, I’d still take Franklin at 16 because I don’t think you’ll see better value there unless something crazy and unexpected happens. But considering the draft we’re looking at, crazy and unexpected should be the unexpected.

    My pick for the next Jimmy Butler is Reggie Bullock.

    And I honestly would have few qualms selecting him at 16 except that it’s very likely I could get him 10 picks later.

    0
  • #785058
    AvatarAvatar
    The Q
    Participant

    I’m a big franklin fan, but not sure he’s a Jimmy Butler type.

    Butler had one really good 3pt shooting year at Marquette as a Jr. and then fell off a cliff his sr. year.

    I soured on him a bit after that, and it was a mistake. But Franklin just has never shown that kind of shooting ability.

    all that said, I’d still take Franklin at 16 because I don’t think you’ll see better value there unless something crazy and unexpected happens. But considering the draft we’re looking at, crazy and unexpected should be the unexpected.

    My pick for the next Jimmy Butler is Reggie Bullock.

    And I honestly would have few qualms selecting him at 16 except that it’s very likely I could get him 10 picks later.

    0
  • #785003
    AvatarAvatar
    The Scare Crow Rises
    Participant

    I Think he’s a less talented Kahwi Leonard, his best fit is to go later and drop to a contender like Memphis and replicate what Tony Allen brought to the table…

    0
  • #785068
    AvatarAvatar
    The Scare Crow Rises
    Participant

    I Think he’s a less talented Kahwi Leonard, his best fit is to go later and drop to a contender like Memphis and replicate what Tony Allen brought to the table…

    0
  • #785009
    AvatarAvatar
    kobyz
    Participant

    the next Iman Shumpert more accurate, if you have to there you can find some similarities as a complete individual.

    0
  • #785074
    AvatarAvatar
    kobyz
    Participant

    the next Iman Shumpert more accurate, if you have to there you can find some similarities as a complete individual.

    0
  • #785023
    AvatarAvatar
    Chilbert arenas
    Participant

    Just like Jimmy Butler I think Franklins success depends on where he lands, besides that I don’t see too many similarities in their game. I think Franklin has better handles than Butler, and Butler has much better shot selection. Both are above averaged athletes and are great competitors, but have opposite personalities on the court.

    0
  • #785088
    AvatarAvatar
    Chilbert arenas
    Participant

    Just like Jimmy Butler I think Franklins success depends on where he lands, besides that I don’t see too many similarities in their game. I think Franklin has better handles than Butler, and Butler has much better shot selection. Both are above averaged athletes and are great competitors, but have opposite personalities on the court.

    0
  • #785041
    AvatarAvatar
    Siggy
    Participant

    No. Butler plays smart, is under control at all times, plays more of a strength game and was/is very efficient. Franklin is wild, unpredictable, inefficient with a low IQ.
    Butler’s really good defensively despite having mediocre length because he’s strong, fundamentally sound and is always on balance. Franklin’s more of a gambler on defense, relying on his aggressiveness and length to be disruptive.

    0
  • #785106
    AvatarAvatar
    Siggy
    Participant

    No. Butler plays smart, is under control at all times, plays more of a strength game and was/is very efficient. Franklin is wild, unpredictable, inefficient with a low IQ.
    Butler’s really good defensively despite having mediocre length because he’s strong, fundamentally sound and is always on balance. Franklin’s more of a gambler on defense, relying on his aggressiveness and length to be disruptive.

    0
  • #785181
    AvatarAvatar
    sportspolymath
    Participant

    He does a little bit of everything and is a proven winner. Guys like this provide excellent value, because jump shooting always gets better at the next level, or usually does. I like him in the top 20.

    0
  • #785246
    AvatarAvatar
    sportspolymath
    Participant

    He does a little bit of everything and is a proven winner. Guys like this provide excellent value, because jump shooting always gets better at the next level, or usually does. I like him in the top 20.

    0
  • #785259
    AvatarAvatar
    SmooveKRYPT
    Participant

    I see more Andre Iguodala

    0
  • #785323
    AvatarAvatar
    SmooveKRYPT
    Participant

    I see more Andre Iguodala

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login