Glen Rice Jr. - NBADraft.net

This topic contains 16 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by CavFanPR 10 years, 11 months ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 8:54am #49355

chrsw003
Participant
Just want to throw out their that Glen Rice Jr. would be a steal at #34 and should definitely be a first round draft pick. Wont be surprised if he goes in the 18-25 area when all is said and done.
dont know how to post video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5E_IpKjowQ
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 9:45am #783106

apb540
Participant
I definitely agree with that. Wouldn’t even be surprised to see him move into the late lottery-mid first range. However, I am not personally that big of a fan of his. He disappeared a lot in college, but if I was drafting around 20 and really needed a SF (ex. Cavs) I would take a chance.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 9:45am #783038

apb540
Participant
I definitely agree with that. Wouldn’t even be surprised to see him move into the late lottery-mid first range. However, I am not personally that big of a fan of his. He disappeared a lot in college, but if I was drafting around 20 and really needed a SF (ex. Cavs) I would take a chance.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 9:46am #783108

King Calucha
Participant
He COULD be the next swingman taken after KCP/Crabbe… in the 18-30 range. I’m definitely sold on him, since he’s proven against decent competition.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 9:46am #783040

King Calucha
Participant
He COULD be the next swingman taken after KCP/Crabbe… in the 18-30 range. I’m definitely sold on him, since he’s proven against decent competition.
0
- Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:07am #783122
  
  chrsw003
  Participant
  I played against him all throughout highschool and AAU, he has an unorthadox style but it works for him thats just his game. Hes improved his jumpshot. I personally would take him over Crabbe. Higher potential I think and can create more. Gets alot of different stats across the board. Dream scenario probably not too realistic, but I want my Hawks to pick KCP and GRjr. Their both about 6’6 so they can be interchanchable at the 2 &3. Resign Korver and you have him and Jenkins coming off the bench. Horford, who knows dont really want to get into getting Dwight lol but that would be pretty damn solid if you ask me.
  0
- Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:07am #783054
  
  chrsw003
  Participant
  I played against him all throughout highschool and AAU, he has an unorthadox style but it works for him thats just his game. Hes improved his jumpshot. I personally would take him over Crabbe. Higher potential I think and can create more. Gets alot of different stats across the board. Dream scenario probably not too realistic, but I want my Hawks to pick KCP and GRjr. Their both about 6’6 so they can be interchanchable at the 2 &3. Resign Korver and you have him and Jenkins coming off the bench. Horford, who knows dont really want to get into getting Dwight lol but that would be pretty damn solid if you ask me.
  0
  - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:27am #783130
    
    TheArtistPaysthePrice
    Participant
    If Crabbe can’t shoot 45 percent on 2’s and 41 from 3, then Rice is better. Rice does more and is a better defender. Crabbe can shoot but unless he is shooting lights out then he’s not better. Crabbe has NBA range, maybe even out to 25, but what coach in the League is going to give him enough string to work out the kinks in his game and get stronger physically.
    0
  - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:27am #783062
    
    TheArtistPaysthePrice
    Participant
    If Crabbe can’t shoot 45 percent on 2’s and 41 from 3, then Rice is better. Rice does more and is a better defender. Crabbe can shoot but unless he is shooting lights out then he’s not better. Crabbe has NBA range, maybe even out to 25, but what coach in the League is going to give him enough string to work out the kinks in his game and get stronger physically.
    0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:01am #783114

CavFanPR
Participant
He’s very athletic but he’s more of a sf and he’s a little undersized for that position.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:01am #783046

CavFanPR
Participant
He’s very athletic but he’s more of a sf and he’s a little undersized for that position.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:19am #783124

TheArtistPaysthePrice
Participant
I don’t see how Alonzo Gee could play 22 minutes a game in the League and he can’t, eventually. He won’t get past the Spurs unless a big is there for them. If he can guard 2’s at 6’6 215 and not be a very slightly undersized 3, I think he will be a solid rotation guy. He just looks like a heady player who uses his athleticism. Guys lose their natural athleticism if they don’t find away to utilizes it in their game. He is a athletic cross between Gary Neal and Danny Green.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:19am #783056

TheArtistPaysthePrice
Participant
I don’t see how Alonzo Gee could play 22 minutes a game in the League and he can’t, eventually. He won’t get past the Spurs unless a big is there for them. If he can guard 2’s at 6’6 215 and not be a very slightly undersized 3, I think he will be a solid rotation guy. He just looks like a heady player who uses his athleticism. Guys lose their natural athleticism if they don’t find away to utilizes it in their game. He is a athletic cross between Gary Neal and Danny Green.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:54am #783142

Lebron’s Hairline
Participant
I see him as a Cj miles type of player. Lets hope he can play alot more smarter than Cj.
0
Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 10:54am #783074

Lebron’s Hairline
Participant
I see him as a Cj miles type of player. Lets hope he can play alot more smarter than Cj.
0
- Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 11:01am #783156
  
  CavFanPR
  Participant
  I have to agree with you. C.J. is a better shooter though and is more of a tall shooting guard.
  0
- Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 11:01am #783088
  
  CavFanPR
  Participant
  I have to agree with you. C.J. is a better shooter though and is more of a tall shooting guard.
  0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.