share
Home › Forums › Basketball › NBA Draft ›

confusion

Posted on: Thu, 06/25/2009 at 9:56pm
ckessler33
ckessler33's picture
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 39
Points: 7
Offline
confusion

there were A LOT of things that I thought were crazy, but one I wanted to get into was, Utah and New Orleans drafting pg's back to back, when they both have the 2 top pg's already in Williams and Paul respectivly, I think Maynor and Collison are good, but I don't understand drafting a guy to be a back up? sorry both teams needed a lot more help in a lot other places like at sg, sf, and another big man for both UT/NO. Yall's reactions


Posted on: Thu, 06/25/2009 - 10:00pm
llperez
llperez's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/13/2009
Posts: 11374
Points: 10440
llperez's 2013 Mock Draft
Offline
pg's

Not sure how they will earn many minutes, but they are both good players and when you are picking in the 20's, sometimes just getting a solid backup is a good thing.

Posted on: Thu, 06/25/2009 - 10:01pm
arman
Registered User
Joined: 05/31/2009
Posts: 390
Points: -237
Offline
agree

i dont get it how come they past budinger and blair cause both of them will fit on their teams

Posted on: Thu, 06/25/2009 - 10:26pm
futureGM22
futureGM22's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/25/2009
Posts: 41
Points: 36
Offline
if the jazz and hornets

if the jazz and hornets believe that collison and maynor will step in right away then they can be viewed more as really cheap free agent signings. both will have salaries around 1.5mil next year, and a solid back up point in free agency goes for about 4 mil. so it's somewhat of a bargin
the hornets did have other wholes though

Posted on: Thu, 06/25/2009 - 10:37pm
auber
auber's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 789
Points: 63
Offline
Depth at the point is

Depth at the point is something that holds both of these teams back.

RSS: Syndicate content