This topic contains 18 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar cabbycab 6 years, 8 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #67212
    AvatarAvatar
    high floor
    Participant

    Just for fun, to help pass the time during these final offseason weeks…… I thought it’d be fun to compare and contrast a couple of stud wings from the 80’s and early 90’s. Dominique ‘The Human Highlight Film’ Wilkins, and Clyde ‘The Glide" Drexler:

    Wilkins:

    • Career: 24.8pts, 6.7rebs, 2.5assists, 46% FG, 80% FT, 1.3stl, 2.5 t.o’s
    • 9 time all star
    • All NBA First Team, 1985-86
    • All NBA Second Team, 4 times
    • Led NBA in scoring in 1985-86 @ 30.2ppg
    • Eight seasons of 2,000+ pts!! (Durability)
    • 2-time slam dunk champion

    Drexler:

    • Career: 20.4pts, 6.1rebs, 5.6assists, 47% FG, 79% FT, 2.0stl, 2.7 t.o’s
    • 10 time all star
    • All NBA First Team, 1991-92
    • All NBA Second Team, 2 times
    • Top 4 in steals per game, four seasons
    • NBA Dream Team selectee, 1992
    • Three time nba finals participant, winner w/ Houston in 1995 
         

    *Who do you guys have as the better player & overall better career?

    0
  • #1105682
    AvatarAvatar
    Dazzling Dunks and Basketball Bloopers
    Participant

     Definitely Clyde. Wilkins was the pure scorer, but Clyde was superior in virtually every other aspect of the game. Clyde’s defense and playmaking skills were vastly superior to Dominique and he made his teammates better in a way that Dominique couldn’t. 

    0
    • #1105684
      AvatarAvatar
      The Goat
      Participant

       Agree, Clyde easily. Nique was a pure scorer though. 

      0
  • #1105689
    Robb_CRobb_C
    Robb_C
    Participant

    Drexler, no doubt he was the West Coast Jordan. 

    0
    • #1105701
      AvatarAvatar
      Dazzling Dunks and Basketball Bloopers
      Participant

       Eh. While drexler was no doubt really good in his prime I’m not sure if I would go that far. Anyone who saw them play would instantly recognize there was a pretty significant gap between the two. Drexler lacked Jordan’s dynamic scoring ability and refined offensive game. He didn’t have anywhere close to the ability to take over a game the way jordan did. I think that’s part of the reason his Portland teams never won, because he just couldn’t carry a team the way the truly elite offensive stars in the league could at that time. I thought he was probably better suited as a second option, a role that he excelled in quite nicely later in his career. I actually think he was probably more comparable to Scottie pippen than Jordan to be honest, but that opens up a whole nother debate.

      0
      • #1105703
        Robb_CRobb_C
        Robb_C
        Participant

         Let me ask you this.. If Clyde wasn’t comparable to Jordan or have similar skillsets.. why were they always guarding each other in Team USA practices.. 

        Clyde was a nightmare! In fact that whole Trailblazer team was ahead of its time.. if Cliff Robinson played in the league today he’d be considered one of the best.

         

        0
        • #1105729
          AvatarAvatar
          he_gets_buckets
          Participant

           Because Clyde was the other shooting guard with similar size to Jordan… if who you guard is how good you are everyone would be the same

          0
        • #1105738
          AvatarAvatar
          SubZero
          Participant

          Maybe because they were the only 2 SGs on the team

          0
          • #1105742
            Robb_CRobb_C
            Robb_C
            Participant

             Exactly my point!! He was the only SG in the league who could keep up with him, hence Clyde being the only other SG on the roster.

            0
  • #1105693
    AvatarAvatar
    cohenbc1
    Participant

    What they said. Up until the ’92 finals, Drexler or Jordan was a legitimate argument. He was that good. 

    0
    • #1105762
      AvatarAvatar
      he_gets_buckets
      Participant

       No. No it was not. Please stop this.

      0
  • #1105697
    AvatarAvatar
    terrancebower
    Participant

     Drexler, easily…. very easily

    0
  • #1105702
    AvatarAvatar
    whiteflash
    Participant

     What people forget (or never knew) about Drexler is what a phenomenal passer he was. I mean, his assist stats are damn good, but his ability to pass the ball was WAY better than his numbers would indicate, and that’s saying something. Drexler was without question the second best 2-guard of his era, and I believe a top 5 2-guard of all time. Wilkins was good but INCREDIBLY one dimensiona. Clyde wins this in a landslide. 

    0
  • #1105707
    AvatarAvatar
    BeastMode716
    Participant

     Drexler was a more well rounded player while Dominique was an unstoppable, explosive scorer

    From 24 thru 31 years old – his prime – Drexler averaged roughly 24 pts 6 reb 6 ast & shot 49% fg%

    During that same age bracket, Dominique averaged 29 pts 4 reb 3 ast & shot 46% fg%

    Both these players were among the greatest in game Dunkers the league has Ever seen – ironically both men are listed at 6’7” but in my mind Dominique was taller b/c Dominique could Yam on Anyone, Any time – in the half court set, on the fast break – if he got a sliver of space Dominique was going Hard to the rim & Dunking 

    Drexler’s exciting dunks came mainly on the fast break. Dominique was closer to Jordan (to me) b/c Dominque was an absolutely impossible to stop scorer who would Ruthlessly Dunk on Evertyone where Clyde’s game was smoother & more team oriented b/c let’s be honest, if he could do what Dominique (or Jordan) could do in the half court he would have done it – Every one would have done it,.,.;…

    If Dominique played in today’s game where you can No longer even hand check on the perimeter half the League would be on a shrink’s couch trying to recover from Dominque posterizing half the team Every night – the man was Not human

     

     

     

     

     

    0
    • #1105721
      AvatarAvatar
      whiteflash
      Participant

       Drexler also averaged over 2 steals and damn near a block a game during that span. Let’s also not forget that Drexler was the man on TWO Finals teams where Wilkins was routinely bounced in the first round.

      0
  • #1105725
    AvatarAvatar
    Illadelph
    Participant

    Drexler was probably the better all-around player, and team-oriented.  By the time he won a chip in ’95 with Houston, he had become the ultimate teammate.  Gotta probably go with Clyde as the overall "better" player.

    BUT, I submit that Dominique was the more athletic, more exciting, and more entertaining player.  I’d rather watch ‘Nique play any day over Drexler.  ‘Nique would absolutely f***ing destroy defenders.  Anyone who got in his way got got f***ing posterized.  If ‘Nique had been on a good team during his prime, he would have been a household name, and we’d be talking about him in the same breath as guys like Charles Barkley, Patrick Ewing, and Michael Jordan.  Instead, he is a relative unknown which is pretty shocking.  Imagine taking the X-Man’s athleticism and dunking and multiplying that by 10.  That was ‘Nique.  I watched him as a boy growing up and I remember so many sick dunks.  Vince Carter has nothing on ‘Nique.  What a freak.

     

       

     

     

    0
    • #1105749
      AvatarAvatar
      whiteflash
      Participant

       Dude, you’re letting childhood memories cloud judgement and common sense. Wilkins ONLY went right, struggled off the dribble, did the same handful of dunks OVER AND OVER…. He was a great scorer who raided the baselines, attacked the offensive glass and had a nice spin move, but saying Vince Carter had nothing on him is absolutely insane. Carter had dunks in traffic that were MUCH better than anything Wilkins ever did in contests, and that’s just the facts.

      0
  • #1105731
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

     Nique was fun to watch. But I am taking Clyde. (Clyde was fun to watch also)

    0
  • #1105791
    AvatarAvatar
    cabbycab
    Participant

     Nique was the 80 – 90’s version of Carmelo.  Great scorer, decent rebounder, never made teammates better and did not get close to winning the title.  Fun as heck to watch.  First player to do windmill dunks routinely in games ( sometimes in traffic ! ) .  

    Clyde was surrounded by better talent.  He had nice stats but he rarely made the big shots at the end of the game.  That was Terry Porter’s job.  The ’92 finals put an end to any conversation that he was on Jordan’s level.  Team actually played better with Danny Ainge in the line up during that finals.  

     

    This is a wash for me.  Clyde has a title, but he played with better talent.  

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login