Archie Goodwin comparison
That's a pretty interesting comparison considering i think Archie will be a surefire lottery/top 10 pick when he comes out and those guys barely crqcked the 1st round. Also be glad this is the internet as i would laugh in your face if this was brought to my attention
Just because a guy does not pan out or have what it takes to stick around in the league does not mean you cannot make a comparison.
joe forte/jr giddens are both horrible comparisons. of course giddens was expected to be a future all star in HS but look how he panned out. archie goodwin has already (2 or 3 games in) developed a better reputation that giddens. as far as forte i dont even know where that came from. but archie goodwin could potentially play in the nba for 7-10 years and that is pretty damn good now a days. id say westbrook is a far fetch but not a a totally impossible destination
HAVE YA SEEN D WADE IN IN COLLEGE THEY PLAY THE SAME NOT SAYING WHEN HE BECOME A PRO THAT HE WID WLL PLAY LIKE D WADE BUT HE PLAYS LIKE HIM AT THE COLLEGE LEVEL!
Larry Hughes comparison isn't that bad. Hopefully he develops a better mind for the game than Larry. If he comes close to his potential I think he can be a Latrell Sprewell type.
i like the wade comparison.
a lot of these players that get compared to wade have anywhere near the slashing ability wade does, archie goodwin is an excellent slasher.
Reminds me of a quicker but out of control (poor man's) Joe Johnson. He can do it all player on offense and a decent defender. He's an isolation offensive player that can create his own shot and shoot from most places on the court.










Archie Goodwin - Joe Forte/J.R. Giddens