[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 76ers have the number 3 and number 10th in this draft.

WHO WILL THEY PICK AT 3 This probably what the Sixers Draft Board looks like

1. Andrew Wiggins 

2. Jabari Parker 

3. Dante Exum 

4.  Joel Embiid 

5. Julius Randle 

How Draft will play out Sixers get their number 2 guy on their draft board

CAVS 1. JOEL EMBIID OR WIGGINS

BUCKS 2. ANDREW WIGGINS OR EMBIID

SIXERS 3. JABARI PARKER 

MAGIC 4. DANTE EXUM

JAZZ 5. NOAH VONLEH

CELTICS 6. AARON GORDON

LAKERS 7. JULIUS RANDLE

KINGS 8. MARCUS SMART

HORNETS 9. DOUG MCDERMOTT

SIXERS 10. ?

I think Joel Embiid goes to Cavs with the 1st pick, Andrew Wiggins goes to Bucks with the 2nd pick and the 76ers will pick Jabari Parker with the 3rd pick.

Jabari Parker is NBA ready and can score he will be the Sixers go to guy. With a coach like Brett Brown he will develop more and become a good defender.

The bigger Question is who do they pick with that number 10 pick or do they trade up with it?

I think if they stay they will pick a shooting guard which one I really don’t know, they can pick Zach Lavine, Nik Stauskas, James Young, or Gary Harris. 

I think they should trade number 10 and one or two of their second picks to the Kings for their 8th pick to pick MARCUS SMART!!! Smart has the ability to play PG and SG he’s 6’3 227 he plays more like a 2 and people compare him to D Wade.

76ers Starting 5

PG Michael Carter Williams

SG Marcus Smart

SF Jabari Parker

PF Thaddeus Young

C Nerlens Noel

NOW THIS IS HOW YOU REBUILD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BallinmvpParticipant]

 No just no. They do not need smart. They would be better off taking a 2 guard who can stretch the floor.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

I Agree if we say at 10 Nik Stauskas or Zach LaVine but getting a guy that would of been a top 5 pick in last years draft and if Exum wasn’t in this draft he would be a sure top 5 pick in this draft. So moving up two spot can’t be that bad to get a player the should of been drafted top 5 but dropped. That all I’m saying.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

I Agree if we say at 10 Nik Stauskas or Zach LaVine but getting a guy that would of been a top 5 pick in last years draft and if Exum wasn’t in this draft he would be a sure top 5 pick in this draft. So moving up two spot can’t be that bad to get a player the should of been drafted top 5 but dropped. That all I’m saying.

[BallinmvpParticipant]

 No just no. They do not need smart. They would be better off taking a 2 guard who can stretch the floor.

[negguaryParticipant]

I wouldn’t mind having smart but I would prefer Lavine who I could get at 10 without giving awat a pick.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 Hey I agree but it’s something about Smart that I really like accept for his flopping. I think he can be a star in the Nba Zach LaVine I like him but I just like sure things and Marcus Smart probably would of been a top 5 pick last year. So why not move up two spots to get him for 10 and second round that they probably going trade anyway.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 Hey I agree but it’s something about Smart that I really like accept for his flopping. I think he can be a star in the Nba Zach LaVine I like him but I just like sure things and Marcus Smart probably would of been a top 5 pick last year. So why not move up two spots to get him for 10 and second round that they probably going trade anyway.

[negguaryParticipant]

I wouldn’t mind having smart but I would prefer Lavine who I could get at 10 without giving awat a pick.

[christebasParticipant]

 How could anyone have Exum ahead of Embid?  Remember we’ve really only seen Exum playing under 19 ball for a grand total of 4 games.  As much as scouts love him, he’s the biggest gamble in the lottery.  Embid was a game changer and dominated D1 ball for close to a full season.  No way the Sixers pass on the any of the big 3 unless Embid’s back is a big problem.  As for 10 who knows, it depends who’s left but Gary Harris would be a great backcourt mate with MCW.  Harris not only is a sick shooter but can get to the hole and play D.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

Hey man brett brown use to coach Exum and sixers might not wont another injured big man and I don’t have him over Embiid I said I think the sixers do on their draft board. Personality I want sixers to draft Parker over everyone just because I think he is that good. If he is not there I want Embiid over wiggins because he might be the best player in this draft long term it’s just how does him and Noel fit together. Wiggins still needs development but with a coach like Brett brown I can see why they want him so bad but I think he can be a bust or star at the next level. Parker and Embiid our sure things to me Wiggins has a question mark over his head we just don’t what he is going to become. Same thing with Exum but we just know more about Wiggins because he played in college. The people who draft them are drafting for potential. 

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

Hey man brett brown use to coach Exum and sixers might not wont another injured big man and I don’t have him over Embiid I said I think the sixers do on their draft board. Personality I want sixers to draft Parker over everyone just because I think he is that good. If he is not there I want Embiid over wiggins because he might be the best player in this draft long term it’s just how does him and Noel fit together. Wiggins still needs development but with a coach like Brett brown I can see why they want him so bad but I think he can be a bust or star at the next level. Parker and Embiid our sure things to me Wiggins has a question mark over his head we just don’t what he is going to become. Same thing with Exum but we just know more about Wiggins because he played in college. The people who draft them are drafting for potential. 

[christebasParticipant]

 How could anyone have Exum ahead of Embid?  Remember we’ve really only seen Exum playing under 19 ball for a grand total of 4 games.  As much as scouts love him, he’s the biggest gamble in the lottery.  Embid was a game changer and dominated D1 ball for close to a full season.  No way the Sixers pass on the any of the big 3 unless Embid’s back is a big problem.  As for 10 who knows, it depends who’s left but Gary Harris would be a great backcourt mate with MCW.  Harris not only is a sick shooter but can get to the hole and play D.

[KHAM83Participant]

t’s the same thing everyday. Your profile says you “just joined today”. I don’t know who, but you’re a regular here who keeps opening new id just to post about the sixers. Its annoying.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

Hey man I feel u I tell u what give me a team other then sixers to talk about random I don’t care. This was my 1st report I had to do my home town 1st. I know my stuff whatsup? Get at me.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

Hey man I feel u I tell u what give me a team other then sixers to talk about random I don’t care. This was my 1st report I had to do my home town 1st. I know my stuff whatsup? Get at me.

[KHAM83Participant]

t’s the same thing everyday. Your profile says you “just joined today”. I don’t know who, but you’re a regular here who keeps opening new id just to post about the sixers. Its annoying.

[Ebown5Participant]

While I agree with you that the top two prospects on the board in a vaccuum are Embiid and Wiggins, I am not convinced that they will be the first two players drafted.

The Sixers at 3 could conceivably have the option to draft any of the top 4 players and we don’t know exactly how the Sixers rank them.

I don’t think that Smart is a good pick for us and certainly wouldn’t trade up for him. If we are sitting there at 10 though and he is still on the board then he might be the best pick simply because he could be the best prospect available and we are not good enough for fit to really be a big factor.

If Smart were available for the Kings at 8(and I am thinking that he probably won’t be) and they haven’t traded their pick for a veteran then I would expect them to want to draft him. He would be perfect for that team!

My prediction is currently that the Cavs take Embiid simply because he is by far the best prospect and just makes too much sense for them. For the Bucks I think that it gets interesting though as Wiggins is probably a worse fit for their team than either Parker or Exum. They may still draft him if they think that he is the most talented player available, but Parker and Exum are both extremely intriguing prospects for them.

 If the Bucks decide that they are fine with either Parker or Exum then maybe they trade down to 4 with Orlando who would take Wiggins and would leave at least one of them still on the board at 4. 

I think that the Sixers would take Wiggins for sure if he were to fall to 3, but if he didn’t then I’m not sure if they would take Parker or Exum. I personally would want Parker, but I don’t know who Hinkie wants. Parker and Exum are so different from one another that depending on which one we get, we may have different needs at 10.

I don’t think that you can take poor defenders with both picks, so that would mean that I wouldn’t take Stauskus at 10 if we got Parker at 3. If we got Wiggins at 3 then I would love Stauskus at 10.

My personal dream scenario without trading up or down would be to get Wiggins at 3 and then Randle at 10. Randle will most likely not be there, but you never know. If HE were on the board at 8 then I would try really hard to trade up to get him.

The possibilities are endless right now for the Sixers. There are just too many variables to really know what is going to happen or even what SHOULD happen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

[trombonematrix43Participant]

Keep the faith for Randle at 10. I don’t see him at 10 either but on the other hand it seems in the last month the only PF prospect that hasn’t had his stock shoot up is Randle….and you never know what these GMs are thinking. 

[trombonematrix43Participant]

Keep the faith for Randle at 10. I don’t see him at 10 either but on the other hand it seems in the last month the only PF prospect that hasn’t had his stock shoot up is Randle….and you never know what these GMs are thinking. 

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 Randle won’t get pass 7 8 or 9 lakers kings or hornets will pick him in a heartbeat. But we can make it happen trade up or trade Thaddeus. 

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 Randle won’t get pass 7 8 or 9 lakers kings or hornets will pick him in a heartbeat. But we can make it happen trade up or trade Thaddeus. 

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

I agree still think Embiid will be the Cavs #1 pick if his back turns out to be ok. I just don’t think the Bucks will pass up on Wiggins but you never know like you said. I just dont want sixers to pass on Parker for Exum another MCW but not really version of him.  

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

I agree still think Embiid will be the Cavs #1 pick if his back turns out to be ok. I just don’t think the Bucks will pass up on Wiggins but you never know like you said. I just dont want sixers to pass on Parker for Exum another MCW but not really version of him.  

[Ebown5Participant]

While I agree with you that the top two prospects on the board in a vaccuum are Embiid and Wiggins, I am not convinced that they will be the first two players drafted.

The Sixers at 3 could conceivably have the option to draft any of the top 4 players and we don’t know exactly how the Sixers rank them.

I don’t think that Smart is a good pick for us and certainly wouldn’t trade up for him. If we are sitting there at 10 though and he is still on the board then he might be the best pick simply because he could be the best prospect available and we are not good enough for fit to really be a big factor.

If Smart were available for the Kings at 8(and I am thinking that he probably won’t be) and they haven’t traded their pick for a veteran then I would expect them to want to draft him. He would be perfect for that team!

My prediction is currently that the Cavs take Embiid simply because he is by far the best prospect and just makes too much sense for them. For the Bucks I think that it gets interesting though as Wiggins is probably a worse fit for their team than either Parker or Exum. They may still draft him if they think that he is the most talented player available, but Parker and Exum are both extremely intriguing prospects for them.

 If the Bucks decide that they are fine with either Parker or Exum then maybe they trade down to 4 with Orlando who would take Wiggins and would leave at least one of them still on the board at 4. 

I think that the Sixers would take Wiggins for sure if he were to fall to 3, but if he didn’t then I’m not sure if they would take Parker or Exum. I personally would want Parker, but I don’t know who Hinkie wants. Parker and Exum are so different from one another that depending on which one we get, we may have different needs at 10.

I don’t think that you can take poor defenders with both picks, so that would mean that I wouldn’t take Stauskus at 10 if we got Parker at 3. If we got Wiggins at 3 then I would love Stauskus at 10.

My personal dream scenario without trading up or down would be to get Wiggins at 3 and then Randle at 10. Randle will most likely not be there, but you never know. If HE were on the board at 8 then I would try really hard to trade up to get him.

The possibilities are endless right now for the Sixers. There are just too many variables to really know what is going to happen or even what SHOULD happen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

[burgessfourParticipant]

That’s my dream scenario as well – Wiggins & Randle – very unlikely, but could happen.

[burgessfourParticipant]

That’s my dream scenario as well – Wiggins & Randle – very unlikely, but could happen.

[Taylor Gang MikeParticipant]

 Parker and Lavine or Embiid or Lavine or Parker and Gordon

[Taylor Gang MikeParticipant]

 Parker and Lavine or Embiid or Lavine or Parker and Gordon

[Neggedpastor]

I find it funny ppl say exum and mcw can make it work but smart and mcw cant co-exist.

I would love to have smart if its going to be an up tempo it shouldn’t matter.

[Ebown5Participant]

Well, Exum is more talented than Smart so I think people are really just saying that Exum and MCW is more likely to work than Smart and MCW would. Exum is much more likely to excel at the 2 than Smart is IMO.

I wouldn’t draft Smart as a two guard, but if he is there at 10 then perhaps you take him based only on his value and play him as the third guard.

  

[Ebown5Participant]

Well, Exum is more talented than Smart so I think people are really just saying that Exum and MCW is more likely to work than Smart and MCW would. Exum is much more likely to excel at the 2 than Smart is IMO.

I wouldn’t draft Smart as a two guard, but if he is there at 10 then perhaps you take him based only on his value and play him as the third guard.

  

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

Dante Exum is pretty much MCW period. Smart is a combo guard to me that plays pg. Exum look like MCW so having two MCWs I don’t know if that works. Smart IQ is high no question great defender no question great driver no question only thing bad u can say about smart is the shove and his shoot isn’t their yet but it will get there.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

Dante Exum is pretty much MCW period. Smart is a combo guard to me that plays pg. Exum look like MCW so having two MCWs I don’t know if that works. Smart IQ is high no question great defender no question great driver no question only thing bad u can say about smart is the shove and his shoot isn’t their yet but it will get there.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 If u seen the sixers play we play up tempo. That’s why I think the can play together if we get Parker first then I think we can take that risk and move up and draft him.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 If u seen the sixers play we play up tempo. That’s why I think the can play together if we get Parker first then I think we can take that risk and move up and draft him.

[Neggedpastor]

I find it funny ppl say exum and mcw can make it work but smart and mcw cant co-exist.

I would love to have smart if its going to be an up tempo it shouldn’t matter.

[jorgeluiszamudioParticipant]

with the 3rd pick just take embiid wiggins or parker (i think parker would be the pick) and with the 10th pick the best sg (with range) available.

it is a easy draft for philly.

pg mcw

sg harris/stauskas/young

sf parker

pf thad

c noel

[jorgeluiszamudioParticipant]

with the 3rd pick just take embiid wiggins or parker (i think parker would be the pick) and with the 10th pick the best sg (with range) available.

it is a easy draft for philly.

pg mcw

sg harris/stauskas/young

sf parker

pf thad

c noel

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

True I know if u can see my mock draft but I have the sixers picking Parker then Stauskas because he is the best shooter in this draft.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

True I know if u can see my mock draft but I have the sixers picking Parker then Stauskas because he is the best shooter in this draft.

[PhillytheKid]

harris to me will be just a body in the NBA.

Harris – average defense, average shooting, limited size.  Whats there to like?  He’s just an average player.  No real explosiveness.  And he’s short.

Lavine – Explosive.  Grew 6 inches, used to play PG, so will be a tremendous off guard.  Has great size and length, and his shot is beautiful.

Stauskas – incredible shooter.  Great length.  Needs help on defense but certainly isn’t a liability.  A little too slow for my liking.  I don’t think he has the footwork of a Gordon Heyward but I think he is a better shooter.  I don’t see him being a starter on a championship team, but a great guy off the bench.  A very good sixth man.  He’s not Ginobli, he’s not athletic enoguh to be Ginobli.  But simply for his shooting, if we draft Wiggins at 3, I would be very happy with him as my SG.

James Young – great size and length.  Has a very good shot it just dind’t always fall.  According to Charles Barkley, he was the best player on the court in the NCAA Finals.  I always thought that myself watching Kentucky play.  He has an NBA body.  I don’t get the Nick Young comparisons AT ALL.  Nick Young does not have the body James Young has.  No way Nick Young would ever play the 3 for Kentucky as a freshman.  Nick Young is an incredible scorer when he’s hot but has NO BBall IQ or conscience.  He just shoots the rock, and doesn’t make anyone around him better.  I think James Young will be very good.

I’d go Lavine > James Young > Stauskas > Harris.  with the 10th pick. 

[PhillytheKid]

harris to me will be just a body in the NBA.

Harris – average defense, average shooting, limited size.  Whats there to like?  He’s just an average player.  No real explosiveness.  And he’s short.

Lavine – Explosive.  Grew 6 inches, used to play PG, so will be a tremendous off guard.  Has great size and length, and his shot is beautiful.

Stauskas – incredible shooter.  Great length.  Needs help on defense but certainly isn’t a liability.  A little too slow for my liking.  I don’t think he has the footwork of a Gordon Heyward but I think he is a better shooter.  I don’t see him being a starter on a championship team, but a great guy off the bench.  A very good sixth man.  He’s not Ginobli, he’s not athletic enoguh to be Ginobli.  But simply for his shooting, if we draft Wiggins at 3, I would be very happy with him as my SG.

James Young – great size and length.  Has a very good shot it just dind’t always fall.  According to Charles Barkley, he was the best player on the court in the NCAA Finals.  I always thought that myself watching Kentucky play.  He has an NBA body.  I don’t get the Nick Young comparisons AT ALL.  Nick Young does not have the body James Young has.  No way Nick Young would ever play the 3 for Kentucky as a freshman.  Nick Young is an incredible scorer when he’s hot but has NO BBall IQ or conscience.  He just shoots the rock, and doesn’t make anyone around him better.  I think James Young will be very good.

I’d go Lavine > James Young > Stauskas > Harris.  with the 10th pick. 

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 I agree but I like Stauskas because he works on his game everyday not to just be an average guy who can just shoot. Some people wouldn’t even have him drafted after his freshman season. Now we’re talking about him being a top 10 pick. He just wants to be the best he can be and Brett brown loves players like this that why we got MCW & Nerlens and that’s why we will pick him.

[Jhavon PhillipsParticipant]

 I agree but I like Stauskas because he works on his game everyday not to just be an average guy who can just shoot. Some people wouldn’t even have him drafted after his freshman season. Now we’re talking about him being a top 10 pick. He just wants to be the best he can be and Brett brown loves players like this that why we got MCW & Nerlens and that’s why we will pick him.

[Author]

Posts