This topic contains 14 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar KevinDurantRocks 14 years, 8 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:17am #7530
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    i ws just wondering what kind of player you think its best to go after in the second round? for me its the upperclassmen who has a solid defensive game and had proved himself in the tournament, Chalmers, Moute, and Lee, you could get the next Ginoble, or Ellis but i think its better to go defensive with later picks. what do you think?

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:22am #197400
    AvatarAvatar
    the microwave
    Participant

    i think u cant wait until the school year starts..Getting awfully bored these days huh…

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:39am #197407
    AvatarAvatar
    BasketballGuru24
    Participant

    2nd round is for role players……And you might get lucky and get a star

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:41am #197408
    AvatarAvatar
    SpencerIsHawesome

    that nasty word…

    ..potential..

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:42am #197410
    AvatarAvatar
    j1232e
    Participant

    most likely take the best overall player, or a weakness on your team depth wise.

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:42am #197411
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    you’re right i am a little bored.

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:47am #197413
    AvatarAvatar
    j1232e
    Participant

    try going outside, play a little basketball or some football, try getting away from the computer for a while!

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:50am #197415
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    i did i havent posted at all today since like 10 minutes ago.

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:50am #197416
    AvatarAvatar
    jojososa
    Participant

    A lot of GMs go for potential n BOTH rounds, but if some1 like boozer or gilbert falls n ur lap u gotta take ’em, but yea I wuld go wif a tuff defensive guy

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:55am #197418
    AvatarAvatar
    j1232e
    Participant

    good for you. I was starting to wonder about you and knickboy, every time i come home and turn on the web you are always on. Not a problem though, dedication to the site. lol

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 9:59am #197422
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    yeah, but knicksboy34 recently has been attacked by some hater and he isnt on much.

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 10:03am #197423
    AvatarAvatar
    j1232e
    Participant

    too bad for him! Do you think your team portland will runaway with the northwest division, or do the nuggets and jazz have a shot at the division?

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 10:05am #197425
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    i think it will be tight with those three teams im not sure who will win it.

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 11:46am #197444
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    I’ve never been a fan of people who think acertain way about drafting like always taking potential, or a proven player, or a guy who fills a need. As a GM, you have to look at each player individually, take all those things into consideration, and then make the best pick possible and stick with it. And I like the Nuggets to win the northwest.

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 08/07/2009 - 4:16pm #197598
    AvatarAvatar
    KevinDurantRocks
    Participant

    should be for role players but it is really just for spark talent lately

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login