share
Home › Forums › Basketball › NBA Draft ›

2003 draft redo

Posted on: Sat, 04/18/2009 at 6:29pm
Al-Farouq Aminu
Al-Farouq Aminu's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/28/2009
Posts: 253
Points: 4
Offline
2003 draft redo

1). The King
2). D-Wade
3). Bosh
4). Melo
5). David West
6). Josh Howard
7). Chris Kaman
8). Mo Williams
9). Kirk Hinich
10). Boris Diaw
11). TJ Ford
12). Leandro Barbosa
13). Nick Collison
14). Travis Outlaw
Too many solid contributors...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_NBA_Draft


Posted on: Sat, 04/18/2009 - 6:39pm
Bballfan123
Registered User
Joined: 11/24/2008
Posts: 22
Points: -1
Offline
......

Darko's not a lottery pick...lol

Posted on: Sat, 04/18/2009 - 11:22pm
Adi Joseph
Registered User
Joined: 06/22/2008
Posts: 460
Points: 506
Offline
1. James 2. Wade 3. Bosh 4.

1. James

2. Wade

3. Bosh

4. Anthony

5. Howard

6. West

7.  Williams

8. Kaman

9. Barbosa

10. Diaw

11. Ford

12. Hinrich

13. Outlaw

14. Perkins

15. Collison

16. Blake

17. Milicic

18. Jones

19. Green

20. Korver

21. Walton

Basically, you could take James and Wade, perhaps the two best players in the NBA, out of the picture, and still have an excellent draft class.

That's what makes the 2003 Draft the best ever. 1984 didn't have this kind of depth. 

Posted on: Sun, 04/19/2009 - 8:36am
Sirlau
Registered User
Joined: 04/19/2009
Posts: 1
Points: 0
Offline
1996 Draft Class

Take a look at that class and get back to me....

Posted on: Sat, 04/18/2009 - 11:42pm
sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6227
Points: 2690
sheltwon3's 2013 Mock Draft
Offline
I would take Hinrich over

I would take Hinrich over Ford because Ford has played less games and Hinrich defense is top notch. If Hinrich starts for another team less say the Kings he could but up huge numbers.

Posted on: Sun, 04/19/2009 - 9:07am
jdubsram-13
jdubsram-13's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/07/2008
Posts: 94
Points: 17
Offline
Agreed with Sirlau

There is no way the 2003 draft class can compare to the 1996 draft. It has produced many of the top players today and still for the next couple of years. The 2003 class is solid and deep but as of now 1996 has the edge

Posted on: Sun, 04/19/2009 - 12:10pm
Money Shot
Registered User
Joined: 04/19/2009
Posts: 3
Points: 0
Offline
why do you guys have kaman

why do you guys have kaman so high? he is decent but not as good as most guys you both listed under him

Posted on: Sun, 04/19/2009 - 4:09pm
sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6227
Points: 2690
sheltwon3's 2013 Mock Draft
Offline
Kaman when he isn't Injured

Kaman when he isn't Injured deserves to be that high. he can score inside and can defend and he isnt that slow.

RSS: Syndicate content