This topic contains 42 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by
TripleDoubleScout 10 years, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2015 - 11:15pm #61104

TripleDoubleScoutParticipantI decided to point this out because no one is paying attention yet to one of the seven or so worst run franchises in the NBA, the Hornets. Ive seen post after post after post on here that deal with conference/team predictions that carelessly place Charlotte ahead of teams like the Pistons, the Pacers, and Magic, all who have clearly improved in the offseason. I have wondered if Jordan and Co. actually are fooling themselves in the same way. Interestingly though, I’m finding out and reading that actual NBA execs and professionals are thinking what I’m thinking and been saying for two years: what in the heck are the Hornets doing, and don’t they know it won’t work? I want to point yall to a fantastic recent article in Grantland that exposes the bleak short term reality of the Hornets, and the great potential (I would say likelihood) for them to enter the Ben Simmons/Harry Giles/DeAndre Ayton future sweepstakes. The article doesn’t predict with certainty that my Hornets will fail, but it’s impossible to miss its overall point. Adjust your predictions accordingly.
grantland.com/the-triangle/good-charlotte-the-hornets-and-the-sliding-scale-of-nba-mediocrity/
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2015 - 11:55pm #1004887

BleedGreen808ParticipantJust curious would you have taken Boston’s offer if you were running Charlotte? I think Boston was willing to give up a lot to move up from 16 to 9. I also wonder what Boston offered Atlanta to get the 15th pick as well. Who knows how Brooklyn looks in 2018. That pick could be near the top or be a mid-late first rounder depending on how Brooklyn can rebuild the next couple years.
My second question is do you believe Polk when he says they didn’t have enough time to think about who they’d pick at 15 and 16? I mean isn’t it the front office’s job to evaluate talent throughout the draft in the event of trades? Not to mention it was reported that Boston had been trying to trade for the 9th pick days before the draft.
Last are you alright with taking Kaminsky or would you have preferred taking Winslow even though you already have MKG and Batum?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2015 - 11:55pm #1004748

BleedGreen808ParticipantJust curious would you have taken Boston’s offer if you were running Charlotte? I think Boston was willing to give up a lot to move up from 16 to 9. I also wonder what Boston offered Atlanta to get the 15th pick as well. Who knows how Brooklyn looks in 2018. That pick could be near the top or be a mid-late first rounder depending on how Brooklyn can rebuild the next couple years.
My second question is do you believe Polk when he says they didn’t have enough time to think about who they’d pick at 15 and 16? I mean isn’t it the front office’s job to evaluate talent throughout the draft in the event of trades? Not to mention it was reported that Boston had been trying to trade for the 9th pick days before the draft.
Last are you alright with taking Kaminsky or would you have preferred taking Winslow even though you already have MKG and Batum?
0- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 11:18am #1004902

TripleDoubleScoutParticipantAll good questions imo. First I think the Boston offer was overrrated. I don’t think that offer gets you a top 5 pick, as I think the Nets will do everything in their power to be competitive the next few years since they can’t tank/rebuild. That being said, I still might have taken it IF all of my preferred prospects were already off the board, which takes me to your 3rd question. Let me be clear: I actually am high on Kaminsky as a productive role player big for the next 10-12 years. The problem is, Winslow I believe will pan out to be a borderline all-star/super 4th option in the mold of Iggy, Wes Matthews and ironically Nic Batum.
As for your second question, yes like you I’m calling BS on that one. Huge BS actually. Everyone knew exactly what picks and players Boston was offering weeks before the draft, and it was being reported by multiple news outlets multiple times that Charlotte was a Celtic trade target.
0- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:45pm #1005057

BleedGreen808ParticipantI agree the offer was overrated mostly because it was so many picks to move up 7 spots. For example one of the 1st rounders was possibly the T-Wolves top 12 protected pick. After next season that pick becomes 2016 and 17 2nd rounders. So really it was probably more three 1st and four 2nd rounders. However, I’m not ready to 100% write off the Brooklyn pick not being really good. We’ve seen in recent years that teams with cap space don’t always get the stars they want. Knicks, Lakers, Mavs have all been looking to get a star with their cap space but continue to strikeout. Then you have to wonder if Brook Lopez can stay healthy. Still 2018 is far away so it is questionable to assume the pick will be top 5 or 10.
What confuses me about Charlotte is that I don’t know which direction they are trying to go. Of course we probably aren’t having this conversation if they didn’t have horrible luck missing out on AD. While reading the article you posted I noticed that Cho wanted Doug McDermott but MJ overruled it because he was a fan of Vonleh. Now that’s fine because Vonleh had fallen right to them and was a higher rated prospect. But then this year they did the opposite. MJ was high on Kaminsky and the higher rated Winslow fell into their lap. I get Kaminsky was your guy but you have Boston’s trade offer or the ability to get Winslow for yourself. You can say Winslow wasn’t a big need after acquiring Batum to go along with MKG but is Kaminsky a big need when you had just traded Lance for Hawes? I think Hawes is a lot better than he was for the Clippers last year.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:45pm #1004918

BleedGreen808ParticipantI agree the offer was overrated mostly because it was so many picks to move up 7 spots. For example one of the 1st rounders was possibly the T-Wolves top 12 protected pick. After next season that pick becomes 2016 and 17 2nd rounders. So really it was probably more three 1st and four 2nd rounders. However, I’m not ready to 100% write off the Brooklyn pick not being really good. We’ve seen in recent years that teams with cap space don’t always get the stars they want. Knicks, Lakers, Mavs have all been looking to get a star with their cap space but continue to strikeout. Then you have to wonder if Brook Lopez can stay healthy. Still 2018 is far away so it is questionable to assume the pick will be top 5 or 10.
What confuses me about Charlotte is that I don’t know which direction they are trying to go. Of course we probably aren’t having this conversation if they didn’t have horrible luck missing out on AD. While reading the article you posted I noticed that Cho wanted Doug McDermott but MJ overruled it because he was a fan of Vonleh. Now that’s fine because Vonleh had fallen right to them and was a higher rated prospect. But then this year they did the opposite. MJ was high on Kaminsky and the higher rated Winslow fell into their lap. I get Kaminsky was your guy but you have Boston’s trade offer or the ability to get Winslow for yourself. You can say Winslow wasn’t a big need after acquiring Batum to go along with MKG but is Kaminsky a big need when you had just traded Lance for Hawes? I think Hawes is a lot better than he was for the Clippers last year.
0- Posted on: Mon, 01/11/2016 - 2:57pm #1036138

TripleDoubleScoutParticipantJust wanted to give BleedGreen props for his opinion/prediction on the Nets pick being a good one. As solid as Frank Kaminsky has been, it is now apparent that my Hornets missed a HUGE opportunity. Just another day at the office though, right Mr. Cho/Jordan? Hopefully fate will forgive our error…
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/11/2016 - 2:57pm #1036274

TripleDoubleScoutParticipantJust wanted to give BleedGreen props for his opinion/prediction on the Nets pick being a good one. As solid as Frank Kaminsky has been, it is now apparent that my Hornets missed a HUGE opportunity. Just another day at the office though, right Mr. Cho/Jordan? Hopefully fate will forgive our error…
0
- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 11:18am #1005041

TripleDoubleScoutParticipantAll good questions imo. First I think the Boston offer was overrrated. I don’t think that offer gets you a top 5 pick, as I think the Nets will do everything in their power to be competitive the next few years since they can’t tank/rebuild. That being said, I still might have taken it IF all of my preferred prospects were already off the board, which takes me to your 3rd question. Let me be clear: I actually am high on Kaminsky as a productive role player big for the next 10-12 years. The problem is, Winslow I believe will pan out to be a borderline all-star/super 4th option in the mold of Iggy, Wes Matthews and ironically Nic Batum.
As for your second question, yes like you I’m calling BS on that one. Huge BS actually. Everyone knew exactly what picks and players Boston was offering weeks before the draft, and it was being reported by multiple news outlets multiple times that Charlotte was a Celtic trade target.
0
- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:32am #1004889

OhCanada-ParticipantI said the same thing last year. That they should blow it up and rebuild correctly. They are making all or nothing pushes for a road seed and its not working. You can’t have Kemba, MKG, and Jefferson as your core none of them can shoot.
To their credit they did a good job going out this year and surrounding that core with shooters. Lamb is a high vole perimeter scorer and proved last year when dialed in he is very explosive get he was awfully inconsistent. Kaminsky showed great perimeter touch but can he rebound and defend at this level. With Batum you have a veteran coming off his worst season yet his upside is very high. Spencer Hawes can work as insurance to Jefferson and another floor stretcher alongside big Al in a veteran mold.
They put the right pieces around their preferred core on paper but their are so many question marks I doubt they beat out 8 other teams in the East.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:32am #1004750

OhCanada-ParticipantI said the same thing last year. That they should blow it up and rebuild correctly. They are making all or nothing pushes for a road seed and its not working. You can’t have Kemba, MKG, and Jefferson as your core none of them can shoot.
To their credit they did a good job going out this year and surrounding that core with shooters. Lamb is a high vole perimeter scorer and proved last year when dialed in he is very explosive get he was awfully inconsistent. Kaminsky showed great perimeter touch but can he rebound and defend at this level. With Batum you have a veteran coming off his worst season yet his upside is very high. Spencer Hawes can work as insurance to Jefferson and another floor stretcher alongside big Al in a veteran mold.
They put the right pieces around their preferred core on paper but their are so many question marks I doubt they beat out 8 other teams in the East.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:41am #1004891

OhCanada-ParticipantBobby Portis and 3 future 1st round picks sounds alot better than Frank Kaminsky.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:41am #1004752

OhCanada-ParticipantBobby Portis and 3 future 1st round picks sounds alot better than Frank Kaminsky.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:56am #1004895

Anton123ParticipantI found it very puzzling what they did with their big men this offseason: they got rid of/lost Biyombo and Noah Vonleh and got Kaminsky, Tyler Hansbrough and Spencer Hawes.
Their big men are now Zeller, Kaminsky, Al Jefferson, Marvin Williams, Hansbrough and Hawes. That’s just zero rim protection, defence and almost no rebounding. I understand that they were terrible shooting the ball last year and wanted to address that, but the new group looks awful and half these players provide basically the same thing.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:56am #1004756

Anton123ParticipantI found it very puzzling what they did with their big men this offseason: they got rid of/lost Biyombo and Noah Vonleh and got Kaminsky, Tyler Hansbrough and Spencer Hawes.
Their big men are now Zeller, Kaminsky, Al Jefferson, Marvin Williams, Hansbrough and Hawes. That’s just zero rim protection, defence and almost no rebounding. I understand that they were terrible shooting the ball last year and wanted to address that, but the new group looks awful and half these players provide basically the same thing.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 1:20am #1004907
sitlbitoParticipantI think Batum will really surprise the Charlotte fans. He’s coming off his worst year and I don’t think such a bad year is meant to happen again. He’s all they need,from passing to shooting to defense.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 1:20am #1004768
sitlbitoParticipantI think Batum will really surprise the Charlotte fans. He’s coming off his worst year and I don’t think such a bad year is meant to happen again. He’s all they need,from passing to shooting to defense.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 2:13am #1004913

220ParticipantI’d say Jordan should remove himself from over riding his GM regarding draft decisions, but then I hear Rich Cho was sure Bismack Biyombo and Cody Zeller were going to be studs. Jordan needs to remove himself from player personnel decisions, fire Cho, hire the highest ranking Spurs exec who assists the GM player decisions, and let him run the show. Unfortunately MJ put his faith in Cho after he already flamed out in Portland. The Hornets may be a lesser version of the Knicks in that their owner messes up all the GM or President’s hard work (ie Dolan forcing Donnie Walsh to trade all the assets he built up for Carmelo Anthony rather than attempting to sign him in the off season while retaining their assets.)
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 2:13am #1004774

220ParticipantI’d say Jordan should remove himself from over riding his GM regarding draft decisions, but then I hear Rich Cho was sure Bismack Biyombo and Cody Zeller were going to be studs. Jordan needs to remove himself from player personnel decisions, fire Cho, hire the highest ranking Spurs exec who assists the GM player decisions, and let him run the show. Unfortunately MJ put his faith in Cho after he already flamed out in Portland. The Hornets may be a lesser version of the Knicks in that their owner messes up all the GM or President’s hard work (ie Dolan forcing Donnie Walsh to trade all the assets he built up for Carmelo Anthony rather than attempting to sign him in the off season while retaining their assets.)
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 2:34am #1004921
SkalAndJamalParticipantI never understood their draft pick selections.
you go from Zeller to Vonleh to Kaminsky. These rooks get 1 yr and if they are not the next coming of tim Duncan they’ll get rid of them lol
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 2:34am #1004782
SkalAndJamalParticipantI never understood their draft pick selections.
you go from Zeller to Vonleh to Kaminsky. These rooks get 1 yr and if they are not the next coming of tim Duncan they’ll get rid of them lol
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 2:45am #1004925
prophetmeirParticipantI believe Jordan doesn’t scout, look at it every player that we draft are from a major program, a traditional winning program and the player has done well in the ncaa tournament. We do dumb things and we get headsight on a player, when we drafted MKG we could have taken Bradley beal then flipped him to To Washington for an extra pick. We took DJ Augustine over Brook Lopez. We took cody zeller over ben mck when we had no shooters on the floor lol.
Having said that this year depends a lot on batum, we have no two guard on the roster. We have no elite shooters on the roster. And also batum can play in small ball lineups. He will also have to shoulder a load of scoring between kemba and Al. That’s a lot of faith to put in a guy coming off the worst stat line of his career. Is he worth the max?
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 2:45am #1004786
prophetmeirParticipantI believe Jordan doesn’t scout, look at it every player that we draft are from a major program, a traditional winning program and the player has done well in the ncaa tournament. We do dumb things and we get headsight on a player, when we drafted MKG we could have taken Bradley beal then flipped him to To Washington for an extra pick. We took DJ Augustine over Brook Lopez. We took cody zeller over ben mck when we had no shooters on the floor lol.
Having said that this year depends a lot on batum, we have no two guard on the roster. We have no elite shooters on the roster. And also batum can play in small ball lineups. He will also have to shoulder a load of scoring between kemba and Al. That’s a lot of faith to put in a guy coming off the worst stat line of his career. Is he worth the max?
0- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 7:09am #1004870

TrillaParticipantLowe mentioned that he heard Jordan doesnt really watch college basketball, and he waits until the weeks before the draft to cram in hours of film on certain players until he makes his decision. If that guy is making your decisions, something has to change
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 7:09am #1005009

TrillaParticipantLowe mentioned that he heard Jordan doesnt really watch college basketball, and he waits until the weeks before the draft to cram in hours of film on certain players until he makes his decision. If that guy is making your decisions, something has to change
0 - Posted on: Sat, 08/01/2015 - 12:59am #1005153
sitlbitoParticipantWorth the max if he was signed this year,considering the salary cap will rise,maybe. I wouldn’t give him the max in 2016. Batum is one hell of a player if used correctly,and even if most NBA players say that,I can tell you that he’s in GREAT shape. He actually shot the ball really well in March and April(43% in march,39%in April). If he shoots that well in Charlotte,it’s already a huge plus. But Batum is much more than that,he’s in the conversation for second best passer amongst SF behind LeBron James and scoring PGs(like Kemba Walker) play very well with him(Lillard in Portland,Parker in the NT). He’s also a terrific overall and versatile defender when locked-in.
Some of his great games are often when the opposite point guard destroyed Lillard offensively,then Portland put Batum on the PG and just turned the game around(I recall the first game of the season against Westbrook who had like 32 in 3 quarters,had 34 at the end of the game because of Batum,or game 4 of the semi conference finals against Parker).
I could see the Batum/Al Jefferson combo being a great pick-and-roll duo. Now is he worth the max I don’t now,it’s a supply demand market,and Batum is the type of player teams want. I could see New Orleans making a run at him,they’ve been lacking a SF for like forever(not that it matters much,but Ajinça is one of his best friends).
0 - Posted on: Sat, 08/01/2015 - 12:59am #1005014
sitlbitoParticipantWorth the max if he was signed this year,considering the salary cap will rise,maybe. I wouldn’t give him the max in 2016. Batum is one hell of a player if used correctly,and even if most NBA players say that,I can tell you that he’s in GREAT shape. He actually shot the ball really well in March and April(43% in march,39%in April). If he shoots that well in Charlotte,it’s already a huge plus. But Batum is much more than that,he’s in the conversation for second best passer amongst SF behind LeBron James and scoring PGs(like Kemba Walker) play very well with him(Lillard in Portland,Parker in the NT). He’s also a terrific overall and versatile defender when locked-in.
Some of his great games are often when the opposite point guard destroyed Lillard offensively,then Portland put Batum on the PG and just turned the game around(I recall the first game of the season against Westbrook who had like 32 in 3 quarters,had 34 at the end of the game because of Batum,or game 4 of the semi conference finals against Parker).
I could see the Batum/Al Jefferson combo being a great pick-and-roll duo. Now is he worth the max I don’t now,it’s a supply demand market,and Batum is the type of player teams want. I could see New Orleans making a run at him,they’ve been lacking a SF for like forever(not that it matters much,but Ajinça is one of his best friends).
0
- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 8:50am #1004892
Stephen A. BaylessParticipantCharlotte was forced to increase it’s playoff push because at the time their attendance was 70-ish% of capacity. I’m from North Carolina and people only went to the games, out of boredom or if they got the tickets for next to nothing. The NBA is a business first, and the Hornets had no national buzz or regional buzz. Allegedly they were losing a ton of money each year.
Also in Charlotte’s defense, they did the draft rebuild. They got the 2nd pick and missed out on Anthony Davis in a draft that wasn’t top heavy. The next year they had the 4th pick in a historically weak draft. I think Noel was worth the risk at 4th but you can’t blame a team for not picking a guy that would have to sit out his whole rookie year. Gordon Hayward would have been a perfect player for them and they offered him the max despite criticism but Utah matched and he blossomed.
It’s crazy because last year through 76 games they had the same record as Boston despite injuries, and the Lance Stephenson fiasco but because Boston won out (with a little help) and Charlotte lost out their seasons are percieved as completely different.
Zach Lowe’s article made a point about getting out of mediocrity and how there is no guarantee. Dropping into the draft doesn’t always work unless you’re committed to 3-5 years around having a terrible record. Every team doesn’t have the luxury. Even hitting on almost every single move (like the Celtics) doesn’t even ensure that. It’s a problem that the NBA needs to address but the league is more profitable than ever right now so I don’t see it happening soon.
On the Kaminsky trade, if Kaminsky is your guy at 9 you take him. Value is overrated if you don’t end up with the players you want/need. Going from 9th to middle and late 1st round picks, is the equivalent of dropping from the late 1st round to 3rd and 4th round in the NFL Draft from a value stand point. Due to the cap going up, Brooklyn is under the luxury tax and next year will have room to sign a max player. The long demise predicted for them was adverted for now, and they won’t bottom out without having their pick. If the Hornets think Kaminsky can be very good that’s more valuable than 4 good to decent value picks in the NBA. In a sport like Baseball or football that’s not the case.
Last note, they didn’t waste the Vonleh selection they turned it into Batum who is only 26 and could be very good for them. His advance stats say that he has a huge positive effect on winning without hogging up offensive possesions. An extremely valuable skill.
0- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:04pm #1004910

TripleDoubleScoutParticipantA good defense of Charlotte on the surface, until you look deeper point by point. Start off with the Gordon Hayward max offer. The key part of that situation was that Utah had made it known they were going to match any offer BEFORE any offer was officially made.The Hornets did the right thing doing due diligence max offering Hayward, but it was a known moot point.
Zach Lowe’s point about how there are no guarantees is a shrewd throwaway line and frankly the weakest part of the article. The key word he uses (and he’s a journalist/writer for a living so he knows what he’s doing) is guarantee, Of course there are no guarantees. About virtually anything actually. When assessing the future of anything (except it’s end) you can only deal with probabilities.
The point about Boston vs Charlotte is a false one too. You can make the exact same argument about any two teams in any sport and it will be true. The fact is every NBA team plays 82 games, with the constant spectre of injuries and "lucky breaks". If you don’t make the playoffs you don’t make the playoffs, whether the margin is one game or 50. Boston’s and Charlotte’s seasons are perceived as different because they simply were.
About Batum, the point people are making isn’t that Batum sucks or even that he isn’t an upgrade, The point is why do the trade if he doesn’t get you to home court advantage territory. Even by the Hornets’ FO own logic laid out in the article, this trade is at least 1 year too late…
0- Posted on: Sat, 08/01/2015 - 12:14pm #1005084
Stephen A. BaylessParticipantI’m not a Charlotte fan so I’m not viewing this through Rose colored glasses. The Zach Lowe line wasn’t as much about guarantees but that there is a team building issue in the NBA. It wasn’t a throwaway line at all. Too much is based on luck and not enough based on shrewdness, planning, and good decision making.
I also don’t know how you can say the Boston Vs. Charlotte point is false either. Yea they made the playoffs as a sub .500 team in a terrible conference and got swept, and you can’t take that away from them. The point is that Boston and Charlotte was more alike for majority of the season than different. Momentum doesn’t carry over from year to year in sports. You can’t make that assertion about any two teams unless you start at game 1. Through 76 games (literally the entire season) they were the same team. Boston won two games with Cleveland resting players that they never would have won, even if they win the other games they would have still missed the playoffs.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 08/01/2015 - 12:14pm #1005224
Stephen A. BaylessParticipantI’m not a Charlotte fan so I’m not viewing this through Rose colored glasses. The Zach Lowe line wasn’t as much about guarantees but that there is a team building issue in the NBA. It wasn’t a throwaway line at all. Too much is based on luck and not enough based on shrewdness, planning, and good decision making.
I also don’t know how you can say the Boston Vs. Charlotte point is false either. Yea they made the playoffs as a sub .500 team in a terrible conference and got swept, and you can’t take that away from them. The point is that Boston and Charlotte was more alike for majority of the season than different. Momentum doesn’t carry over from year to year in sports. You can’t make that assertion about any two teams unless you start at game 1. Through 76 games (literally the entire season) they were the same team. Boston won two games with Cleveland resting players that they never would have won, even if they win the other games they would have still missed the playoffs.
0
- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:04pm #1005049

TripleDoubleScoutParticipantA good defense of Charlotte on the surface, until you look deeper point by point. Start off with the Gordon Hayward max offer. The key part of that situation was that Utah had made it known they were going to match any offer BEFORE any offer was officially made.The Hornets did the right thing doing due diligence max offering Hayward, but it was a known moot point.
Zach Lowe’s point about how there are no guarantees is a shrewd throwaway line and frankly the weakest part of the article. The key word he uses (and he’s a journalist/writer for a living so he knows what he’s doing) is guarantee, Of course there are no guarantees. About virtually anything actually. When assessing the future of anything (except it’s end) you can only deal with probabilities.
The point about Boston vs Charlotte is a false one too. You can make the exact same argument about any two teams in any sport and it will be true. The fact is every NBA team plays 82 games, with the constant spectre of injuries and "lucky breaks". If you don’t make the playoffs you don’t make the playoffs, whether the margin is one game or 50. Boston’s and Charlotte’s seasons are perceived as different because they simply were.
About Batum, the point people are making isn’t that Batum sucks or even that he isn’t an upgrade, The point is why do the trade if he doesn’t get you to home court advantage territory. Even by the Hornets’ FO own logic laid out in the article, this trade is at least 1 year too late…
0
- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 8:50am #1005031
Stephen A. BaylessParticipantCharlotte was forced to increase it’s playoff push because at the time their attendance was 70-ish% of capacity. I’m from North Carolina and people only went to the games, out of boredom or if they got the tickets for next to nothing. The NBA is a business first, and the Hornets had no national buzz or regional buzz. Allegedly they were losing a ton of money each year.
Also in Charlotte’s defense, they did the draft rebuild. They got the 2nd pick and missed out on Anthony Davis in a draft that wasn’t top heavy. The next year they had the 4th pick in a historically weak draft. I think Noel was worth the risk at 4th but you can’t blame a team for not picking a guy that would have to sit out his whole rookie year. Gordon Hayward would have been a perfect player for them and they offered him the max despite criticism but Utah matched and he blossomed.
It’s crazy because last year through 76 games they had the same record as Boston despite injuries, and the Lance Stephenson fiasco but because Boston won out (with a little help) and Charlotte lost out their seasons are percieved as completely different.
Zach Lowe’s article made a point about getting out of mediocrity and how there is no guarantee. Dropping into the draft doesn’t always work unless you’re committed to 3-5 years around having a terrible record. Every team doesn’t have the luxury. Even hitting on almost every single move (like the Celtics) doesn’t even ensure that. It’s a problem that the NBA needs to address but the league is more profitable than ever right now so I don’t see it happening soon.
On the Kaminsky trade, if Kaminsky is your guy at 9 you take him. Value is overrated if you don’t end up with the players you want/need. Going from 9th to middle and late 1st round picks, is the equivalent of dropping from the late 1st round to 3rd and 4th round in the NFL Draft from a value stand point. Due to the cap going up, Brooklyn is under the luxury tax and next year will have room to sign a max player. The long demise predicted for them was adverted for now, and they won’t bottom out without having their pick. If the Hornets think Kaminsky can be very good that’s more valuable than 4 good to decent value picks in the NBA. In a sport like Baseball or football that’s not the case.
Last note, they didn’t waste the Vonleh selection they turned it into Batum who is only 26 and could be very good for them. His advance stats say that he has a huge positive effect on winning without hogging up offensive possesions. An extremely valuable skill.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 2:38pm #1005075

OhCanada-ParticipantThis is why you can’t really hate what Hinkie is doing in Philly…unless your a season ticket holder. The 76ers made a clear plan to tank and rebuild. So they will continue the rebuild until they are comfortable with the assets they have acquired.
Charlotte did not do this. The Hornets plugged players into positions they would not predictably be successful and expected them to produce. While rebuilding theyvsigned veterans to help the team immediatly forcing the issue on the teams success instead of waiting and reserving key minutes for their coveted lottery picks development process. By doing this they also got worse lottery position and lower draft selections which means less talent. Any lottery talent has a chance to be a great player under the right guidance and they have not gotten the most out of their selections and their team building has been flawed.
The Boston comparison is also flawed. Boston "made" the playoffs. Not only that but they did so with a young talented upband coming coach, a young talented up and coming roster, they have tons of assets, picks and prospects the organization can use to build and strengthen their team going forward, they have financial flexibility, and a good attendemce/revunue from their fanbase as a result compared to Charlotte.
Just seems like they have no real plan.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 2:38pm #1004936

OhCanada-ParticipantThis is why you can’t really hate what Hinkie is doing in Philly…unless your a season ticket holder. The 76ers made a clear plan to tank and rebuild. So they will continue the rebuild until they are comfortable with the assets they have acquired.
Charlotte did not do this. The Hornets plugged players into positions they would not predictably be successful and expected them to produce. While rebuilding theyvsigned veterans to help the team immediatly forcing the issue on the teams success instead of waiting and reserving key minutes for their coveted lottery picks development process. By doing this they also got worse lottery position and lower draft selections which means less talent. Any lottery talent has a chance to be a great player under the right guidance and they have not gotten the most out of their selections and their team building has been flawed.
The Boston comparison is also flawed. Boston "made" the playoffs. Not only that but they did so with a young talented upband coming coach, a young talented up and coming roster, they have tons of assets, picks and prospects the organization can use to build and strengthen their team going forward, they have financial flexibility, and a good attendemce/revunue from their fanbase as a result compared to Charlotte.
Just seems like they have no real plan.
0- Posted on: Sat, 08/01/2015 - 12:20pm #1005088
Stephen A. BaylessParticipantAssets that they couldn’t even turn into the 9th pick. A lot of Boston assets are more valuable on this board than they are in real life. On top of that with no superstar they will be hard pressed to rise about 45 wins.
There situations aren’t much difference except for the organization, which is my point exactly. Charlotte faced real issues of why they couldn’t continue to bottom out and be terrible. There is no leveled playing field in the NBA.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 08/01/2015 - 12:20pm #1005228
Stephen A. BaylessParticipantAssets that they couldn’t even turn into the 9th pick. A lot of Boston assets are more valuable on this board than they are in real life. On top of that with no superstar they will be hard pressed to rise about 45 wins.
There situations aren’t much difference except for the organization, which is my point exactly. Charlotte faced real issues of why they couldn’t continue to bottom out and be terrible. There is no leveled playing field in the NBA.
0
- Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 3:16pm #1005081

omphalosParticipantI like the Jeremy Lamb pick-up, he could really reinvent himself next to Walker in Charlotte.
I don’t like the Kaminsky draft pick, but Batum could be a really nice piece and take some pressure off MKG to be the only defensive guy.
Charlotte without chemistry issues and a healthy roster could definitely make a run at the 8 seed if things break right for them.
I think MKG was the wrong draft pick in what is going to be a historically good draft IMO and Barnes, Drummond or even Beal made more sense at 2 than MKG, which has only become more evident as time went on.
The Zeller pick made no sense to me either, he was hugely overrated and there were simply better prospects available.
I want Charlotte to be good, but it’s hard to see it happening.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 3:16pm #1004942

omphalosParticipantI like the Jeremy Lamb pick-up, he could really reinvent himself next to Walker in Charlotte.
I don’t like the Kaminsky draft pick, but Batum could be a really nice piece and take some pressure off MKG to be the only defensive guy.
Charlotte without chemistry issues and a healthy roster could definitely make a run at the 8 seed if things break right for them.
I think MKG was the wrong draft pick in what is going to be a historically good draft IMO and Barnes, Drummond or even Beal made more sense at 2 than MKG, which has only become more evident as time went on.
The Zeller pick made no sense to me either, he was hugely overrated and there were simply better prospects available.
I want Charlotte to be good, but it’s hard to see it happening.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 3:39pm #1005087
Mr_Jeans11Participant5c
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/31/2015 - 3:39pm #1004949
Mr_Jeans11Participant5c
0 - Posted on: Sat, 08/01/2015 - 4:26am #1005188

mgreener_34ParticipantI actually like what they have done, and this team will most likely be the most talented team since the Bobcats were created, so it’s hard to go against it. Sure, they are building a treadmil, but shouldn’t you guys be happy to not be a bottom feeder. If the team buys in, I’m sure you could pull off a 7 seed.
For starters, I really do like the Batum trade. He’s a team player who can shoot the ball, and guard multiple positions. You’re probably going to see him play the stretch 4 a lot against teams that run out really small lineups, and his perimeter D will help get CHA back to where they were two years ago on that end. I also like the fact that he is a great guy. They need players like that to give perspective and focus to the team.
I also don’t mind the Frank pick, but do think it was terrible to turn down a trade that gives them that much flexability, and was even worse not to snag arguably a top 5 prospect in the draft in Winslow. But I understand why they did it. They are obviously trying to mimick SAS and GSW of the last couple of years with a pace and space offense, and they think Frank can help with that. Having Great shooters/passers in Kaminski and Zeller is going to be big if they are trying to focus on this kind of offense, and makes sense with the Batum trade.
I know he gets a lot of flack, but I also like Kemba. He can create his shot, is good on the break, and gets otheres involved. He’s never been on a team that had floor spacing, so we will finally see what he really can do this year. Have Frank/Batum on the wings, and using Zeller in the PnR could be deadly for Kemba, so I expect him to have a much more effiecient year. His best year came in 2012-13, and ironically it’s when the Hornets were starting BJ Mullens at the Center spot, and this helped space the floor for Kemba. He shot .423% that year, and I would expect the same this year.
Overall I think a lineup of
Kemba-Lin
MKG-Lamb
Batum-Williams
Zeller-Kaminski
Big Al- Hawes
Is really not that bad, and I expect them to be on the phones all year trying to get rid of Big Al for anything. What makes that team any worse than the Celtics team that went to the playoffs last year? It’s pretty much the same exact build, except what we lack in wing defenders they have, and what they lack in perimeter defenders, we have. This team could easily win 45 games in the East if they stay healthy and get any sort of contribution from Zeller and Frank.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 08/01/2015 - 4:26am #1005048

mgreener_34ParticipantI actually like what they have done, and this team will most likely be the most talented team since the Bobcats were created, so it’s hard to go against it. Sure, they are building a treadmil, but shouldn’t you guys be happy to not be a bottom feeder. If the team buys in, I’m sure you could pull off a 7 seed.
For starters, I really do like the Batum trade. He’s a team player who can shoot the ball, and guard multiple positions. You’re probably going to see him play the stretch 4 a lot against teams that run out really small lineups, and his perimeter D will help get CHA back to where they were two years ago on that end. I also like the fact that he is a great guy. They need players like that to give perspective and focus to the team.
I also don’t mind the Frank pick, but do think it was terrible to turn down a trade that gives them that much flexability, and was even worse not to snag arguably a top 5 prospect in the draft in Winslow. But I understand why they did it. They are obviously trying to mimick SAS and GSW of the last couple of years with a pace and space offense, and they think Frank can help with that. Having Great shooters/passers in Kaminski and Zeller is going to be big if they are trying to focus on this kind of offense, and makes sense with the Batum trade.
I know he gets a lot of flack, but I also like Kemba. He can create his shot, is good on the break, and gets otheres involved. He’s never been on a team that had floor spacing, so we will finally see what he really can do this year. Have Frank/Batum on the wings, and using Zeller in the PnR could be deadly for Kemba, so I expect him to have a much more effiecient year. His best year came in 2012-13, and ironically it’s when the Hornets were starting BJ Mullens at the Center spot, and this helped space the floor for Kemba. He shot .423% that year, and I would expect the same this year.
Overall I think a lineup of
Kemba-Lin
MKG-Lamb
Batum-Williams
Zeller-Kaminski
Big Al- Hawes
Is really not that bad, and I expect them to be on the phones all year trying to get rid of Big Al for anything. What makes that team any worse than the Celtics team that went to the playoffs last year? It’s pretty much the same exact build, except what we lack in wing defenders they have, and what they lack in perimeter defenders, we have. This team could easily win 45 games in the East if they stay healthy and get any sort of contribution from Zeller and Frank.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |