J’Mison Morgan Eligible (Figures to Be the Starting C for Baylor)

book it

book it

wow Baylor just got alot better they are a very scary team Big 12 watch out

wow Baylor just got alot better they are a very scary team Big 12 watch out

Baylor is THE team of any team west of the Mississippi….They are gonna wreck now….Texas is aight and so is K-State but its OV for the Big 12…..and Lace Dunn might have just become my favorite for POY…..that just took the heat off him big time and he can drill all day when he is actually open….all f-in day….

Baylor is THE team of any team west of the Mississippi….They are gonna wreck now….Texas is aight and so is K-State but its OV for the Big 12…..and Lace Dunn might have just become my favorite for POY…..that just took the heat off him big time and he can drill all day when he is actually open….all f-in day….

im surprised you guys are so high on him. He showed nothing special in 2 years at ucla. He is big and can carve out some space, but he was never gona get more then 10-15 minutes at ucla had he stayed. Maybe he he develops some better post moves, because he is kinda slow to get easy baskets off his athleticism.

im surprised you guys are so high on him. He showed nothing special in 2 years at ucla. He is big and can carve out some space, but he was never gona get more then 10-15 minutes at ucla had he stayed. Maybe he he develops some better post moves, because he is kinda slow to get easy baskets off his athleticism.

its really more of a defense and rebounding thing….Perry Jones was their only true size but he isn’t really a big defender or rebounder…..he can block shots sure but as far as being an actual post defender he would probably get pounded and more importantly get into big time foul trouble more often than not….

its really more of a defense and rebounding thing….Perry Jones was their only true size but he isn’t really a big defender or rebounder…..he can block shots sure but as far as being an actual post defender he would probably get pounded and more importantly get into big time foul trouble more often than not….

Have fun thinking he will reach Josh Lomers’ levels. He is a big body, nothing more. I would sooner predict a guy like Sekelja -in his second year in the US- emerge because of his skill set than someone who has shown himself to have bad hands, no skills, and limited interest in improving himself.

Have fun thinking he will reach Josh Lomers’ levels. He is a big body, nothing more. I would sooner predict a guy like Sekelja -in his second year in the US- emerge because of his skill set than someone who has shown himself to have bad hands, no skills, and limited interest in improving himself.

Lomers was a solid college player. He had the health problem (I can’t remember what it is) that limited how long he could play, but he the time he gave was quality. Nothing in the past two years would indicate any minutes J’Mison Morgan will give will be anything decent.

Lomers was a solid college player. He had the health problem (I can’t remember what it is) that limited how long he could play, but he the time he gave was quality. Nothing in the past two years would indicate any minutes J’Mison Morgan will give will be anything decent.

First of all, Ekpe Udoh and Curtis Kelly sat out a year. They had a year to dedicate to personal development while practicing on the scout team.

Second, Lomers was a good college player. Far be it from the Spurs to invite bad college players to their summer league team. Heck, he’ll probably have a nice career in Europe given that there are two games a week and it isn’t uncommon for big men to play all of 15-20 minutes per game. J’Mison Morgan went to UCLA and did nothing. He did nothing on bad UCLA teams that needed size because they were playing a 6’7 Reeves Nelson at center. Why would I assume changing teams would necessarily change the outcome? Why would a new coach look at playing Morgan over Cory Jefferson or Sekelja when another one with a good resume chose not to given a similar alternative? The only reason to think he would come in and start is the based off the regard he was held in during high school.

First of all, Ekpe Udoh and Curtis Kelly sat out a year. They had a year to dedicate to personal development while practicing on the scout team.

Second, Lomers was a good college player. Far be it from the Spurs to invite bad college players to their summer league team. Heck, he’ll probably have a nice career in Europe given that there are two games a week and it isn’t uncommon for big men to play all of 15-20 minutes per game. J’Mison Morgan went to UCLA and did nothing. He did nothing on bad UCLA teams that needed size because they were playing a 6’7 Reeves Nelson at center. Why would I assume changing teams would necessarily change the outcome? Why would a new coach look at playing Morgan over Cory Jefferson or Sekelja when another one with a good resume chose not to given a similar alternative? The only reason to think he would come in and start is the based off the regard he was held in during high school.

“Lomers basically sucked. He was a big body who fouled and only made plays that were based off sheer size, and he didn’t even really do that all that effectively for more than like 5 minute spurts. Morgan’s role will be to do the exact same thing Lomers did, except he has the upside to be even more effective.”

Yeah, there is two years of evidence at UCLA a little matter of Josh Lomers now collecting a paycheck to play basketball that laughably contradicts any point you are trying to make.

“Lomers basically sucked. He was a big body who fouled and only made plays that were based off sheer size, and he didn’t even really do that all that effectively for more than like 5 minute spurts. Morgan’s role will be to do the exact same thing Lomers did, except he has the upside to be even more effective.”

Yeah, there is two years of evidence at UCLA a little matter of Josh Lomers now collecting a paycheck to play basketball that laughably contradicts any point you are trying to make.

morgan does have some upside and can most likey contribute somewhere. He got off to a horrible start partly becasue his conditioning was terrible and howland didnt give him much of a look until he got in shape. But he is stil slow and uncordinated offensively. Im sure he has learned some things at the defensive end to earn minutes, but i dont think he is the type of guy that makes a difference in final 4 predictions. I dont know much about baylor, but i can see him maybe getting 6 points and 4 rebounds and contributing right away. But he would have been the 4th best big man at ucla had he returned and nobody was really dissapointed to hear he was leaving.

morgan does have some upside and can most likey contribute somewhere. He got off to a horrible start partly becasue his conditioning was terrible and howland didnt give him much of a look until he got in shape. But he is stil slow and uncordinated offensively. Im sure he has learned some things at the defensive end to earn minutes, but i dont think he is the type of guy that makes a difference in final 4 predictions. I dont know much about baylor, but i can see him maybe getting 6 points and 4 rebounds and contributing right away. But he would have been the 4th best big man at ucla had he returned and nobody was really dissapointed to hear he was leaving.

Ahh, I love when BothTeamsPlayedHard and Iggy argue back & fourth.

Ahh, I love when BothTeamsPlayedHard and Iggy argue back & fourth.

So if you watch basketball, then explain those two years where Morgan could have afforded UCLA a lot of lineup flexibility and the body to be a defensive presence against Pac 10 players. And before you laugh at the numbers Lomers put up, understand they were triple that of Morgan at UCLA. Plus, Morgan has no skills to speak of and showed a poor work ethic so that clearly means he will take full advantage of a second chance. Oh but wait, he was so highly regarded coming out of high school so of course JNixon-Iggy9 thinks that player will be handed minutes and produce. Funny how all those games you watch and you still think those prep rankings mean something.

So if you watch basketball, then explain those two years where Morgan could have afforded UCLA a lot of lineup flexibility and the body to be a defensive presence against Pac 10 players. And before you laugh at the numbers Lomers put up, understand they were triple that of Morgan at UCLA. Plus, Morgan has no skills to speak of and showed a poor work ethic so that clearly means he will take full advantage of a second chance. Oh but wait, he was so highly regarded coming out of high school so of course JNixon-Iggy9 thinks that player will be handed minutes and produce. Funny how all those games you watch and you still think those prep rankings mean something.