This topic contains 86 replies, has 18 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar bkballer 15 years, 12 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #19618
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2ccrts4

    You can add some first round and second round picks to this as well as money

    0
  • #359907
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    I think the Knicks would most likely swap Gallo in for Randolph to make the deal a lock.

    0
  • #359911
    AvatarAvatar
    Stojakovicfor3
    Participant

    The Knicks would have to throw in Felton so it would probably be like: Felton, Gallo and Chandler for CP3

    0
  • #359913
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    thats a bad trade for the hornets. The best player involved is randolph and they get to eat the last year of currys deal on top of that? Plus i dont think the knicks could include any first rounders until 2014 wich is not exactly gonna make the hornets giddy. And the hornets dont get to shed any of their bad contracts like okafor or peja?

    0
  • #359915
    AvatarAvatar
    the I in win
    Participant

    I thought the Knicks loved Gallo, would they give him up before Randolph.

    0
  • #359916
    AvatarAvatar
    PurpleMonkeyDishwasher
    Participant

    Felton can’t be traded until jan. or Feb. as per NBA free agency rules.

    0
  • #359917
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    Felton can not be trade right not I think you have to wait til Dec. Also Gallo is a Mike D type or player but if push came to shove I guess they would include him if they felt they were getting Melo.

    Randolph played at LSU so i would think New Orleans would want him to keep fan interests.

    0
  • #359918
    AvatarAvatar
    ghettosermon
    Participant

    The Hornets would probably want Gallinari in any Paul trade. Also if they trade Paul they will make sure that they make the other team take on Okafor’s horrendous contract or at least James Posey’s contract. They’d rather keep expirings like Songaila and Julian Wright and send out guys like Posey and Okafor.

    0
  • #359919
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    The Knicks have first rounders. They have a swap with Houston and they traded a pick. They also got some second rounder from GSW. GSW should not be good enough for those 2nd rounders to suck.

    0
  • #359920
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    I agree about the posey but i don’t know if Knicks do the deal if they can’t have money for Melo.

    0
  • #359923
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    THe swap is optional so they cant trade that pick.

    They cant trade a first rounder until 2014, which is a killer.

    0
  • #359926
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    ll

    Please, the Knicks have 1st round picks in 2011 and 2013…Do the info.

    If NY wants to get Paul- Gallo would have to be in the deal. And also- Taking Curry’s expiring contract is not a big deal. Gives you cap space in 2011.

    0
  • #359929
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    They cant trade back, to back first rounders.

    0
  • #359930
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    I like Gallo but I did not know New Orleans wanted him over Randolph. When did that happen?

    0
  • #359932
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    Randolph is very talented and I think he is from Louisiana. I know he went to LSU

    0
  • #359933
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    That’s true, you cannot trade the actual pick but if you can either

    – Rights to swap

    -Draft a player and trade him.

    NY could make a deal to give them rights to swap where NO is almost guranteed to get the pick.

    0
  • #359934
    AvatarAvatar
    IndianaBasketball
    Participant

    I think Portland could put together a much better package, especially considering they have a huge expiring contract in Pryzbilla and Andre Miller with a team option in 2011-2012.

    Portland could afford to take on Posey’s contract, while giving New Orleans plenty of young talent.

    0
  • #359936
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    haha, knicksoby gonna educate me now. You do know league rules require you have at least 1 draft pick every other season. Do your homework before you call out people for stuff you dont know.

    0
  • #359937
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    But ig they got Paul they would be better than New Orleans, lol and also theres no binding way to draft and trade players, and im sure New Orleans wouldnt trust New York.

    0
  • #359942
    AvatarAvatar
    dwat4444
    Participant

    http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29xggng

    Bare with me, NO gets a ton of cap room over the next two years(talking 40 mil) without taking on a PG to hinder collison. They also get a good wing and some youth and one of LA PGs, probably some draft picks involved as well.
    Orlando gets an elite PG and a versatile forward that doesn’t mind taking a bench Or they can play lewis at the 3, odom at the 4(or switched). Also, they get rid of Nelson, cuz he’ll be expendable.
    Lakers get a quality PG and trade away Odom’s inconsistent play. They get Bass to come off the bench also.

    I know its unlikely but i feel like its good for all teams involved.

    0
  • #359951
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    Do your homework before you call out people for stuff you dont know.

    Did I not say the Knicks could draft someone then move them? The Knicks have picks to move if needed. You also don’t think the Knicks could try to invite a 3rd team?

    Your making it like NY has no pieces to get Paul. That’s my only issue.

    0
  • #359954
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    How could they someone and then move him?

    And they do have peices, they just cant trade a first rounder till 2014 lol.

    0
  • #359955
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    Dwat that trade sucks for New Orleans. Vince is old and Bass played there already and they let him go.

    Orlando and Laker first rounder would not mean much considering they would be in the 25 and up

    0
  • #359958
    AvatarAvatar
    ummm…Looney
    Participant

    dwatt is DEFINITELY a Magic fan….wow

    The Hornes get absolutely jobbed in that trade.

    0
  • #359961
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    knicksboy, just man up and admit you were wrong

    0
  • #359963
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    I wasn’t wrong.

    The Knicks could offer deals to swap picks and/or do deals for lotto protected picks.

    Hell, the Knicks just did the deal involving a 2011 and 2012 pick like 5 months ago…. how are you telling me what could be moved?

    0
  • #359964
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    They didnt deal their 2011, and 2012 pick.

    They traded their 2012 pick, and offered a swap for their 2011 pick.

    Knicks can offer a swap but i doubt theyd get a higher pick from the Knicks if they got Paul.

    0
  • #359966
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    ”New York Knickerbockers President of Basketball Operations Donnie Walsh announced today that the team has acquired seven-time All-Star swingman Tracy McGrady from the Houston Rockets and guard Sergio Rodriguez from the Sacramento Kings, as part of a three-team trade. New York traded guard Larry Hughes to Sacramento and forwards Jordan Hill and Jared Jeffries to Houston, as well as a protected 2012 first round pick and the Rockets have the option to exchange first round draft selections in 2011. Sacramento acquired forwards Carl Landry and Joey Dorsey from Houston and Houston acquired guard Kevin Martin and forward/center Hilton Armstrong from Sacramento.”

    see.

    0
  • #359967
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    Knicks can offer a swap but i doubt theyd get a higher pick from the Knicks if they got Paul.

    They can offer a swap. So how am I wrong?

    0
  • #359968
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    knicksboy, i said they cant trade away their first rounders in a deal today for chris paul until 2014. You told me to do my info and that the hornets have 1st rounders in 2011 and 2013 as if they could somehow trade those for chris paul. They cant, they can not trade those for chris pual or anyone else. League rules prohibit that. Thus, you were wrong. You were worng in every sense of the word wrong. ANd you are too stubborn to admit it. I never said the hornets didnt have trade pieces just siad they dont have picks for awhile which they dont. Funny thing is, im wrong about details all the time. But i dont go around calling people out and telling them to do their homewrok and then turn around and try and act like "well, they have pieces, they could do things to make it work" after i was corrected.

    0
  • #359970
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    Plus, Timmy- You have to read friend.

    I never said they traded both picks. I said they did deals involving both 2011 and 2012 picks.

    0
  • #359971
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    The question now would be what will be the difference between Houston and Knicks pick without Chris Paul and what would be the different with Chris Paul. Also if Knicks get Chris Paul, I am going out on a limb here but I think they win more games than Houston making that 2011 pick theirs and good for a trade with New Orleans but it would probably be in the the late teens early 20’s

    0
  • #359972
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    knicksboy, i said they cant trade away their first rounders in a deal today for chris paul until 2014.

    That’s not true. They give up a 1st round pick without strings attached (swaps) until 2014.

    0
  • #359974
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    Im not saying they cant do anything with their picks, its just you have to have to have a first rounder every year, So they can swap all they want.

    But i highly doubt the Hornets would get a higher pick in the draft.

    0
  • #359977
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    Why can’t the Knicks trade the 2011 pick. Regardless of a swap they still have a pick. I don’t know all of the draft rules but I have never heard of a team doing a swap that could not move their pick. Knicks should be able to put an option that New Orleans has the right to claim their pick they want to which New Orleans would have to exercise or not before the draft. I have seen this happen before lots of times.

    0
  • #359978
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    They can trade a pick.

    But they have to get a first rounder back.

    @Sheltwon

    Theyll get that pick back but they cant trade it, no more than another swap.

    And they definitely cant trade it until the next of end season to see if they have a worse record than Houston.

    0
  • #359979
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    haha, sheltwon didnt say ‘swaps’ he said trade away the pick. I was talking directly to him anbout that which you tryied to correct me on. NOw you are tyring to back track and are too stubborn to admit you were worng by saying well they could swap picks they could change draft position wehn neither i nor sheltwon were talking about that. We were talking about good old fashion trading a pick. Your losing credibility in my eyes big time on this one the longer you refuse to man up.

    0
  • #360008
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

    Whoevers taking Paul is taking Okafor.

    Randolph
    Chandler
    Jordan
    Curry
    Felton

    for

    Okafor
    Paul
    Wright

    -Paul and Stoudemire could be better than Nash and Stoudemire.
    -New York would have to find a way to find a starting wing like Josh Howard.
    -All of these players will get better playing with Paul.

    PG-Paul,Douglas,Rautins
    SG-Azubuike,Wright,
    SF-Galinari,Fields,Walker
    PF-Stoudemire,Turiaf
    C-Okafor,Barron,Mosgov

    -In 2012-13 they would have 30 Mil committed on a great core of Felton, Collison, Poindexter, Brackins, Randolph, with options to re-sign Chandler, Jordan and Thornton as un-restricted Free agents.
    -They have many expiring contracts that can help contenders possibly build their team for an extra push to win it all.
    -This trade gives them good young talent and potential at every position PG-Collison, SG-Thornton, SF-Poindexter, PF-Brackins, C-Randolph (I’m not sure if he can actaully play Center but I heard he could…).

    PG-Collison, Felton
    SG-Thornton,Chandler
    SF-Poindexter,Stojakovic,Posey
    PF-West,Brackins, Songolia
    C-Randolph,Jordan, Curry

    0
  • #360029
    AvatarAvatar
    NashyMing
    Participant

    Felton can’t be traded until December 15……

    If the Hornets would try to trade Paul to the Knicks then I think they can probably convince Paul to play some games for the Hornets and see how the season goes for the first 2 months before deciding to break up.

    A lot of “good teams on paper” stumbled out of the gate and then eventually needed to rebuild/retool the roster by January.

    0
  • #360049
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    1) The Knicks have nothing to offer the Hornets for Chris Paul. They owe a 2012 first round pick to Houston, and therefore cannot send their semi-swapped 2011 first rounder to New York. Teams are not allowed to deal future first round picks in back-to-back seasons, so the next first rounder the Knicks can trade is 2014. The Hornets may very well be playing in Las Vegas or Newark by then.

    2) The Knicks have youth, but none of their youth has proven anything. Randolph is a long athlete, not some building block prodigy. Chandler’s name has no value to anyone who lives outside the New York metro area. Ditto for Gallinari. Curry’s expiring deal would be, at most, able to merit saving New Orleans future money on Okafor. It wouldn’t have anything to do with a Paul deal. Walker and Douglas are NBA bodies, but aren’t tradeable assets. Felton can’t be moved until the winter, and even then would have no value in a Paul trade as the Hornets already have Collison.

    3) Under no possible circumstance can the Knicks put together a better deal than Portland. Really, the only team with the assets to put together a deal that would work for both sides is Portland. If the Blazers want him, they have the pieces to part with to get him. They have Bayless, Babbitt, Batum, Fernandez, Oden, Williams, Claver, Koponen, Freeland, Johnson, and Mills. They can offer a deal that sends Paul and Okafor to the Blazers and New Orleans gets Przybilla, Oden, Miller, Bayless, Fernandez, Batum, and the rights to Claver and Freeland.

    Portand:
    PG: Paul, Miller, A. Johnson, Mills
    SG: Roy, Williams
    SF: Matthews, Babbitt
    PF: Aldridge, Pendergraph, Cunningham
    C: Camby, Okafor

    New Orleans:
    PG: Miller, Collison, Bayless
    SG: Thornton, Fernandez
    SF: Batum, Stojakovic, Pondexter, Wright, (Claver)
    PF: West, Songaila, Brackins
    C: Oden, Przybilla, Gray, (Freeland)

    0
  • #360055
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    I disagree with 1 and 2 and I agree with 3.

    The Blazers have all the chips to make a great move for Paul. They could also get back a West or Okafor because there’s been rumblings that they wanted to move Aldridge for 2 seasons now. If the Blazers would want the best deal- Portland would probably be the best place to get it.

    I think your underrating the Knicks. They have some players to move if NO wanted to move Paul to NY.

    The Knicks could come up to NO and offer

    Gallinari, Felton, Chandler, Curry, Azubukie and 2 future 1st rounders( maybe a swap in 2013 and the outright 2014 pick) for Chris Paul and Julian Wright and I’d think that it could get it done.

    Why would that be a good deal? Gallinari is a knockdown shooter. You may not think so but he’s produced really well last season. Chandler could be a bench player. He’s solid and has the length to defend and score well. Curry and Azu are both expiring contracts so no matter what- Your getting 13 million off the books. Felton could be a solid backup to Collison and he only has 2 years on his deal. He could be dealt or traded in 2011.

    The only downside is the picks IMO

    0
  • #360072
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    Your idea doesn’t come close to what Portland can offer. New Orleans has $19 million coming off the payroll after this year when Peja and Songaila’s deals expire. It is one thing to take back Curry’s expiring deal if they can just get out of Okafor, because then they could use that money to get a second option for Paul. If Paul is gone, the cap space is not close to being as valuable. They wouldn’t getting the big free agents unless they outbid someone, so they are best off getting the king’s ransom of young rookie scale talent that Portland can put together. Gallinari is a 42 percent shooter and can’t guard anyone. Is he better than Luke Babbitt? Probably not by much. Is he more valuable than multiple players who can do more than one thing? I doubt it. I think a package centered around Oden, three or four other former first round picks, and Przybilla’s expiring deal for Paul and Okafor’s bad deal is the best offer New Orleans can hope for. I’m not a Blazers fan. I don’t have a great deal of respect for their core, but it looks really good if Chris Paul is running the point. I can see New Orleans taking those young players, and maybe after a year of beat downs in the West finding a few that can be a part of a rebuilt team.

    0
  • #360075
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    “Your idea doesn’t come close to what Portland can offer”

    I’m almost 100 certain that’s what I said. I’ll even quote it

    “The Blazers have all the chips to make a great move for Paul. They could also get back a West or Okafor because there’s been rumblings that they wanted to move Aldridge for 2 seasons now. If the Hornets would want the best deal- Portland would probably be the best place to get it.”

    0
  • #360083
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    i love how everyone was raving about randolph before and now that hes a knick he has no value.

    I have to agree. Now he’s a Knick it’s all I hear. I remember people calling him the next Lamar Odom. Now? He’s lucky to be on the roster. LOL +1 man.

    0
  • #360082
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    i love how everyone was raving about randolph before and now that hes a knick he has no value. Knicks have A LOT of young cheap talent. Gallo, Randolph, Chandler, Douglas, Walker, Aziibukee, Mozgov, Felton, Fields, Jordan, Rautins… you are telling me that a package of these players can’t be made that is good enough for a player DEMANDING to be traded and will leave in 2 years.Picks are extremely overrated since the draft only produces 4-5 players a year with better potential than that either gallo or randolph. There are more busts than legit contributors…hence the same teams are in the lottery every year. If a lottery pick was as essential to success as you guys make it out to be, Clippers would be a powerhouse by now.Plus why would the hornets really care about a first round pick from a team that has paul and amare, that pick will be in the 20s and they have picks there for sale every year. Knicks can include 3 mill in the deal so NO can go out and buy themselves the 25th pick.

    0
  • #360087
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    Knick hate glasses are strong… when Amare was tearing through the league February through April and would have brought his team to the finals if not for Kobe being ridiculous everyone loved him…now his knees are giving in apparently. I can’t wait for Amare and Bosh to go head to head because Amare will destroy that skinny soft pussy. I bet if the Knciks signed Bosh people would say hes soft and can’t lead a team. Knicks have a solid squad about 10 young players with solid potential that take up 20 million in cap, a superstar (who cares if they overpaid they have the $$, you gotta spend it somewhere), still have money for a max next year so the Amare signing affect nothing…and guess what they arent scared of the luxury tax so Gallo, Randolph, Chandler and whoever else earns a decent paycheck will get it.

    0
  • #360092
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    The Knicks could have gotten Wade, Bosh and James and people would say

    I think there a lotto team…. It’s the way it is.

    0
  • #360094
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    not lottery but they would find something wrong with their bench and say they can’t beat boston, orlando and la. Meanwhile everyone is cool with a Chalmers and Arroyo playing PG and 4356 year old Zydrunas at C.

    0
  • #360098
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    “i love how everyone was raving about randolph before and now that hes a knick he has no value. Knicks have A LOT of young cheap talent. Gallo, Randolph, Chandler, Douglas, Walker, Aziibukee, Mozgov, Felton, Fields, Jordan, Rautins… you are telling me that a package of these players can’t be made that is good enough for a player DEMANDING to be traded and will leave in 2 years.”

    Please try to make the argument any of combination of that supposed “young, cheap talent” is more appealing than what Portland can put together. You can’t. Anthony Randolph showed flashes during rookie year. He did nothing to improve himself, launched a bunch of bad mid-range jumpers for Golden State, and then got hurt. Have fun with him. Gallinari must be the greatest one-way player who shoots 42 percent from the field in the history of the NBA. He has to be. Timofey Mozgov can walk up to you in his Knicks jersey and you still wouldn’t know who he was. Are you really going to tout the young talent of 24-year old 2nd round rookies? Please.

    0
  • #360099
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    “The Knicks could have gotten Wade, Bosh and James and people would say

    I think there a lotto team…. It’s the way it is.”

    Actually, most of us just pointed out that those three would never go to New York, and by the way we were right.

    0
  • #360104
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    Gallo’s shooting numbers are skewed because 60% of his attempts where threes, his TRUE SHOOTING percentage is actually pretty high. He played with greedy ball hogs and no playmakers, a player like Gallo will benefit more than anybody from a real point guard. And yes they can do better than the Blazers, they can also take on a bad contract if they have to. Don’t compare a guy who’s never played in the NBA to a guy who put up 15 and 5 basically his rookie year.

    0
  • #360108
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    Gallo also plays decent defense and is one of the best defenders the knicks had last year don’t listen to the media so much.

    0
  • #360111
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    BTPH

    Can you read? Like honestly? Did I not say that Portland could offer the best deal?

    0
  • #360112
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    “And yes they can do better than the Blazers, they can also take on a bad contract if they have to”

    So funny. You can’t argue with delusion, so I’ll stop. Don’t get too disappointed when Paul isn’t on the Knicks.

    0
  • #360116
    AvatarAvatar
    dahoodrecruiter
    Participant

    watever the knicks have to do to get {cp3} they better do it

    0
  • #360119
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    portland is not going to give up oden, roy, or aldridge I cant imagine NO would want miller, camby or mathews at 7 million. obviously portland has a 547894 times better roster, but in terms of cheap young talent knicks are no worse.

    0
  • #360121
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    i think the blazers would trade oden or aldridge in a heart beat for chris paul

    0
  • #360126
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    “And yes they can do better than the Blazers, they can also take on a bad contract if they have to”

    I never said that.

    0
  • #360128
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    Who were the ball hogs on New York?

    Harrington wasnt afraid to take shot but he shot a good 45% from the field.

    You guys are gonna miss him as instant offense. off the bench.

    Lee?
    Sergio?
    Duhon?

    Are those guys ballhogs?

    0
  • #360133
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    You watch the Knicks at all? Harrington is the definition of a black hole ball hog. Guy wins u 5 games, loses you 15. Duhon, other than the pick and roll, was the most incompetent PG the league has seen in a very long time. Nate, Hughes and all the other scrubs that were in and out of our line up were chucks as well.

    0
  • #360136
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    I don’t think were gonna miss Harrington that much.

    He had alot of bad games as a Knick last season. I think Amare will score more and I believe Gallinari and Chandler will get slight point increases.

    Kelenna will be that heater off the bench.

    0
  • #360140
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    I have been a Knick fan for over 15 years and Al Harrington is by far my least favorite Knick ever. Most frustrating and stupid player I have ever seen. Duhon and Jared Jeffries are a close 2nd btw. I’m just so glad we got rid of all these losers I dont even care if the Knicks get Paul, I’m just saying contrary to what you guys are saying they could put together a solid package for a trade.

    0
  • #360144
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    Duhon wasnt a chuck though, hes a bad point guard but hes a good passer, and he doesnt have anything besides that.

    Harrington is not a chucker, whether you like it or not the Knicks didnt have many player that can creat, and he created hes instant offense for them.

    Nate, and Hughes didnt playu much so their basically irreelevent, Nate is kind of a chucker.

    Just face it the Knicks lacked offensive creators which is a big weakness.

    Gallenari actually shot a lower percentage than Harrington so why isnt he a chucker?

    Your just making up those excuses.

    And ive seen 20-25 Knicks games.

    0
  • #360149
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    just because your shooting percentage is high doesnt mean u are not a black hole ball hog… offense movement stops when harrington has the ball. duhon is not a good passer, hes a good pick and roll player its different, even if the pick and roll isnt there he tries to force it in because thats all he got. Gallo isn’t a pick and roll player he needs a real creator (felton should be an improvement). Plus as I have said check Gallos True Shooting which takes into account the fact he took more 3s than 2s and it will be high.

    0
  • #360151
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    Just face it the Knicks lacked offensive creators which is a big weakness.

    I can agree with that. The Knicks had alot of players who needed scoring option to be created for them last season. I think Felton will be that guy who takes the scorers ( Randolph, Gallinari, Azubikie, Amare) and help them. I think the Knicks won in the part they got length and some defense this offseason.

    I predict these numbers for next season

    Amare- 24 points, 8 rebounds per game
    Gallo- 18 points, 6 rebounds per game
    Randolph- 16 points, 10 rebounds per game
    Azubikie- 13 points, 4 rebounds per game

    0
  • #360152
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    I know.

    But also you have to take in account his lack of being able to create, Duhon a good passer.

    his assists went down because lack of good offensive players.

    Harrington isnt a black hole. He didnt the best shots but he created what others on the team couldnt so i dont blame him.

    0
  • #360159
    AvatarAvatar
    nyk92
    Participant

    ok first of all, for everyone who says the hornets would want felton, you are wrong! remember darren collison the young PG who lit it up when Paul was gone last yr? yeh the hornets would want him to be the future and let him be just like paul, second of all anthony randolph has a higher value then galinari, anthony randolph is a top prospect and if it wasnt for injueries last yr then he would have been great just look at his numbers. third of all, whoever said that wilson chandler only means somehting in NY, scouts see talent and chandler is a solid 2 gaurd in this league. the knicks would still have felton on that roster so they would just move him to free some space for Melo in 2011 if they get paul so felton isnt a problem having on their roster bc he will be gone soon enough. the knicks would have to get rid of chandler, randolph and picks.

    0
  • #360160
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr.Knick 32
    Participant

    ok first of all, for everyone who says the hornets would want felton, you are wrong!

    Felton has a 2 year deal worth 15 million. If they moved him, he could be a good ( but overpaid) backup in year 1 and trade bait in year 2.

    0
  • #360165
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    timmah i dont know what knicks you have been watching, duhon is an awful passer and harrington is most definitely a black hole who take dumb shots and drives in the paint with his head down and losses the ball. i feel bad for the nuggets fans, most frustrating bonehead in the league.

    0
  • #360171
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    Yeah Al Harrington is a bit of a ball-hog

    0
  • #360172
    AvatarAvatar
    nyk92
    Participant

    oo and whoever said galo is a good defender, u r deadd wrong hahah he cant stay in front of anybody, he is late on help defense, he just was able to recover on smaller players bc they underestimated his length, hes a great offensive player but as a knicks fan he is a horrrrible defnder!

    0
  • #360174
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    never said he was great, hes not awful either, slightly below average is about right.

    0
  • #360179
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    I actually think Gallo is a slightly above average defensive player.

    0
  • #360181
    AvatarAvatar
    nyk92
    Participant

    i mean hes pretty good at recovering but as a true defender he is awful but still i just want to see CP3 in a knicks uniform man

    0
  • #360187
    AvatarAvatar
    nyk92
    Participant

    timmahforprez listen i want u to go watch a knicks game from last yr and show me one single time he stayed in frotn of his defender every team just islolated him and went to work, he recovered on smaller guys but everyone else made him look silly, oo yeh he also got dunked on ALOT

    0
  • #360189
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    Hes a good weakside defender, and has good feet for his size.

    I think you severely underrating his defense.

    0
  • #360194
    AvatarAvatar
    nyk92
    Participant

    i watch every knicks game (its pathetic i know) he is allways a step or 2 late, and gets beat often i mean he has the right idea but is allways a step or 2 behind

    0
  • #360204
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

    As a complimentary piece to Collison, and Thornton rebuilding the Nohla Franchise, Oden and Batum alone is better than anything the Knicks can offer. Randolph and Galinari are good but Galo is a weak defender and argueably the worst case of a tweener in the league and a bad defender, Randolph is a freak athlete but also plays the 3/4 and if he plays the 5 he is the skinniest C in the League. The only arguement you can make is Oden has huge injury problems…okay youre right so throw in Fernandez and some picks and base a deal around that. Knicksboy I know you have an intelligent basketball mind and you are capable of not being a homer so just accept that Portland is the team that can give the best possible deal. Bkballer I have no faith in you realizing this at all…

    0
  • #360350
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    lets break it down : there are 4 teams he wants to play on; mavs, blazers, knicks magic

    Mavs are DEFINITELY out because they play in the same divison, 0% chance they want to help the Mavs and play Paul 4 times a year for the next decade. Blazers are also still out west, so its iffy. Fernandez will not go to NO he is already boycotting leaving America and his value is insanely low right now. Oden, who the hell wants Oden right now? The guy might never play another game in the NBA, or average 10 games a year for his career, injury prone centers that have to bang in the paint don’t last. Batum is definitely not better than Gallo, the guy averaged 15 and 5 basically his rookie year on a crazy mess of a team, a good PG and the guy averages at least 17 and 6 next year. Randolph has superstar potential as well and for the 1.5 million he gets paid he is a crazy bargain. The Magic, while a much more superior team than the Knicks do not have much to offer either. Howard is off the market, Carter is old and expires at the end of the year no point in NO renting him for a year, Lewis has an awful contract and NO is broke, Nelson is useless because they have Collison, so whats left?

    0
  • #360366
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    the division thing is overrated. You play the teams in your division the same amount as you play anyone else in your conference except a couple teams you only 3 times vs 4 times. If the hornets are gonna rule out dallas becasue they are in the same division, then by that logic why wouldnt they rule out portland as well? In the end, teams are gonna try to get the best deal possible. If that means trading him to another western team then so be it.

    0
  • #360367
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    I agree Portland can offer the best deal but Chris Paul still have to sign off on it and he may not want to go to Portland over New York but if push came to shove maybe he would. He may be tired of being in the West.

    Also New York also has GSW 2nd round picks. I think two of them and I am sure that GSW second round picks will be between 38 and 47 and a lot of quality 2nd rounder have been picked there and you dont have to pay them 1st round money.

    Who doesnt want young players and cheap young talent.

    This would help New Orleans in the long run.

    Also Kevin Pritchard is not in Portland anymore so I am sure they could come up with a good deal but now I dont know if they will do it.

    0
  • #360370
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    Since when is Wilson Chandler chop liver. I think he is as good a prospect as Batum.

    Gallinari at worst will be Bargnani and I believe he is better so I don’t see why people are disclaiming this dude.

    New York has a lot of cheap talent like I said and that may be on interest to New Orleand and also New York can take on more money than they send out because they have cap space.

    Portland would probably not mind taking Okafor so that trumps New York but if New York could find a third team to take Okafor contract then maybe New York can offer the best deal

    0
  • #360405
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    Wilson Chandlers as good a prospect as Batum?

    Youve been eating too much chop liver.

    0
  • #360420
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    Wilson Chandler 6’8″ 225lbs
    been in league 3 years
    career avg in 182 games 31.5 min 451. fg .308 3pt .779 ft 5.1 rb .73 st .77 blks 1.9 ast 13.4 pts

    He had 15.3 pt last year

    Those are the stats but he can score for deep, he is athletic and can finsih, can post up smaller players, his dribbling is decent but needs some work, and is decent on defense.

    Nicolas Batum 6’8″ 200 lbs
    been in league 2 years
    career avg in 116 games 20.4 min .477 fg .387 3pt .825 ft 3.1 rb .64 stl .56 blk 1.0 ast. 6.9 pt

    He had 10.1 pt last year in which he only played 37 games

    Those are the stats but he can handle the ball, has long arms for defending which is pretty good at, in the limited minutes he has put up decent percentage on a small amount of shots.

    I have seen maybe one Portland game and I have seen quite a few Knicks games.

    Why is Batum a better young prospect than Chandler?

    Why is it that when someone is on the Knicks people take away their value?

    0
  • #360457
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    Hes not better Chandler played injured half the year averaged 15 and 6 shooting 48%, the guy is 23 years old, built like Lebron (obviously nowhere near Lebron), has a great mid range game , gets to the paint with ease and is a solid defender. Never going to be a star because he is very laid back but a very solid starter.

    0
  • #360463
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    Yeah Chandler isn’t a worse prospect than Batum. Better at everything other than maybe 3-point shooting and he’s got MAYBE slightly more defensive potential.

    0
  • #360466
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    Gallo/Randolph + Chandler + TD + 2 2nd rounders = good deal for Paul

    Get one solid player with All Star potential, one good starter or great bench player, a solid back up pg/sg and some early 2nd round picks all for a total of 6 million against the cap.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login