This topic contains 15 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by dmo21 11 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 3:51pm #764839
brennenrundParticipantHow heavily weighted is the player’s team’s record? As far as point guards go, Holiday and Kemba had better years than half ot the players on the list. They couldn’t choose their teammates.
0- Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 6:35pm #764878
dmo21ParticipantWinning % was the main problem I have in my system as it does put some players ahead of others that I don’t think should be. But if you have a guy like Kemba putting up good numbers on a horrible team, what is the chances that he would get the same minutes and produce the same numbers on a better team? So my formula promotes being good on a playoff team rather than putting up even better numbers on a bad team.
I did change the weighting in my formula for these standings as it was giving me weird results before. The formula is different for each position, but the first part is a combination of PPG, RPG, APG, SPG, BPG, and TPG weighted on their positional needs. This is then multiplied by their TS% and MPG. The winning percentage is multiplied by 0.75 to reduce its weighting and is then multiplied to the rest of the equation.
I’m not trying to prove a point or anything with this, its just something I do for fun while seeing how “accurate” I can get a ranking system based on many variables without being biased in an opinion.
0
- Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 3:54pm #48301
dmo21ParticipantOkay, so I am back again with my positional rankings based on this formula I made which puts together your normal stats, true shooting percentage, winning percentage, and minutes played. I think this works as it is not based on just stats but also winning and how much the player is needed by their team (so this drops guys putting good numbers on a bad team). These are just based off of this year. This does not include potential or how they usually play, just based off of this seasons performance. I’ll do a top 10 for each position. Here they are:
PG:
1. Paul
2. Westbrook
3. Curry
4. Parker
5. D.Williams
6. Lawson
7. Conley
8. Felton
9. Hill
10. WallSG:
1. Wade
2. Harden
3. Bryant
4. JR Smith
5. Iguodala
6. J.Johnson
7. Thompson
8. Ellis
9. Crawford
10. MartinSF:
1. James
2. Durant
3. Anthony
4. George
5. Gallinari
6. Gay
7. Pierce
8. Deng
9. Parsons
10. LeonardPF:
1. Bosh
2. Lee
3. Griffin
4. Ibaka
5. Randolph
6. West
7. Aldridge
8. J.Smith
9. Faried
10. NowitzkiC:
1. Duncan
2. Howard
3. Horford
4. Chandler
5. Gasol
6. Noah
7. B.Lopez
8. Jefferson
9. Asik
10. Hibbert0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 3:57pm #764847
NickWayne87Participantvery flawed formula
0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 4:04pm #764848
mini_marzParticipantEven as a Knicks fan I could never put Chandler above Gasol. I would also take pierce and deng over gallinari
0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 5:45pm #764867
BigMac12111ParticipantI’m curious as to what the formula is. If it’s simply a plug-and-play one, I would suggest maybe looking into changing the winning % for WS or WS48 but that may just be me. I do think that you, for the most part, have the right 10 guys at each position but the rankings might be a bit off on some of them imo.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 6:12pm #764871
Tiger1313ParticipantAgree to disagree but ok!
0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 6:15pm #764873
EntropyParticipantI don’t think these lists are worth doing, the further you go down a list the harder it is to put one person above another.
I think teirs might be better.
0- Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 6:41pm #764879
dmo21ParticipantThis is why I only did a top 10, because as you get further down winning percentage really dictates where guys are. I could do tiers as there is a numerical value for every player. For example these are the point guards with values:
10.190 Paul
9.613 Westbrook
8.723 Curry
8.651 Parker
7.493 D.Williams
7.112 Lawson
6.693 Conley
5.487 Felton
5.414 Hill
5.053 Wall
4.984 Jennings
4.953 Teague
4.836 Holiday
4.685 Lillard0
- Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 6:50pm #764885
Mad MaxParticipantI promise you, Knicks or Pacers would swap Felton or Hill for Wall in a nano-second. Both teams would be better with Wall instead of their current PG.
0- Posted on: Sun, 04/21/2013 - 6:39am #764954
dmo21ParticipantWell it’s only based off of this season in which Wall only played 49. Plus Wall averages a lot of turnovers.
0
- Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 10:09pm #764908
domeico7Participantstopped reading when I saw Wade as number 1 SG!
0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 10:11pm #764909
domeico7ParticipantOMG!! Bosh is number 1 PF? Now I’m really angry
0- Posted on: Sun, 04/21/2013 - 6:50am #764956
dmo21ParticipantBosh gets put ahead of guys like Lee and Griffin because he averages more blocks, less turnovers, and has a high TS%. I don’t like it either (as a Raptors fan) but he is a very good and skilled player.
0
- Posted on: Sat, 04/20/2013 - 10:16pm #764912
Tongue-Out-Like-23ParticipantPoor Parker
He’s never going to get the respect he deserve.
And Bosh at #1 isn’t much of a surprise, there are only a handful of good PFs in the league. And even less of them better than Bosh. I mean, outside of an aging Gasol, who’s more skilled than Bosh?
0- Posted on: Sun, 04/21/2013 - 12:30am #764918
ThenilonatorParticipantHere’s a couple to start with:
Nowitzki
West
Smith
Randolph0
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |