This topic contains 6 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by slepchor 11 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 04/04/2013 - 10:47pm #47823
valentineWho do you take?
Very different kind of bigs, one brings a package full of offensive talent while the other one is a big bodied banger.0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/04/2013 - 11:06pm #760406
ilike.panochasParticipantGive me Isaiah Austin over Adams. Adams’ lack of production is enough for me to stay away from him till late 1st round to early 2nd round. Both players I would consider “boom-or-bust” type prospect, but I have to give Austin the edge due to much better production.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/05/2013 - 2:26am #760427
SiggyParticipantI wouldn’t even consider Austin a C. He’s got toothpick legs and no leverage at all. He’ll get pushed around by bigs which will force him to the perimeter.
If I’m looking for a C I’d take Adams.
He’s got every physical tool you’d want from a C. Austin looks like he’s one misstep away from breaking in half.Normalized per 36 stats
Adams: 12/10.6 3.4 blks a game on 57 FG%
Austin: 15/9.7 1.9 blks on 46FG%If stats are the determining factor, I’ll take the defense and rebounding over the inefficient scoring.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/05/2013 - 3:28am #760434
For_Never_EverParticipantA 7fter that doesn’t like the paint or can’t play inside because his lack of strength, that favors shooting 3 pointers. So if your team is looking for a less athletic Byron Mullen or a thinner Spencer Hawes type of player, I suggest taking Isaiah Austin. I’m taking my chances with Steven Adams.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/05/2013 - 4:57am #760442
NYFinest12ParticipantI think the only thing Isaiah Austin is missing is strength if he gets bigger I don’t think he will be scared to bang downlow likenow. If Isaiah was stronger who would you take between him and Steven Adams. A big who can step out jumpers and a pretty good handle for a big or a big man who moves like a robot and is just ll catch lobs unless he develops . Plus there have been a lot of skinny big man who have had success is the NBA
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/05/2013 - 6:47am #760454
HaleParticipantNeither are very good but I’d take Adams just because he’s a great athete and could end up being great on the defensive side of the ball. Austin will likely be mediocre on both offense and defense.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/06/2013 - 4:05pm #760731
slepchorParticipantAustin is a thinner, less athletic version of perry jones III, and this thing with the 3s, I think he only does it because he weighs 210 lbs and even a 6’6 forward can push him out of the paint. Real talented 7 footers with a perimeter game to go with their height are rare to find (Dirk, Bargnani), so unless austin turns out to be a huge gym rat and transforms his body into a machine, only teams that have the room for some gambling should approach. If he banged on Adams in the post he would be taken off the game on a strecher, that’s for sure.
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |