Best LeBron/SuperTeam Post

Tongue-Out-Like-23's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/16/2010
Posts: 8316
Points: 11893
Best LeBron/SuperTeam Post

LeBron can't win it alone? Neither could MJ, Bird or Magic

It seems curious how the Miami Heat in general, and LeBron James in particular, are coming under attack from some notable Hall of Famers for forming a superteam when those same Hall of Famers enhanced their careers in pretty much the same manner.

Magic Johnson, Larry Bird and Michael Jordan, to varying degrees, came down hard on the concept, as though the sanctity of the game was threatened somehow by the uniting of LeBron, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh. We'll get to the silly reason why these players decided to become teammates -- um, to win championships? -- a bit later. But first, let's examine those who are taking offense to it.

Magic? Didn't he have Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, James Worthy, Byron Scott and Michael Cooper for much of his career?

Bird? Wasn't he part of the storied Celtics' front line with Kevin McHale and Robert Parish, while also enjoying the company of Reggie Lewis, Tiny Archibald and Dennis Johnson for stretches?

Jordan? Did he tell the Bulls "no thanks" when the idea of bringing in Dennis Rodman to join him and Scottie Pippen was raised? A team that went on an epic 72-win run during their first season together? Were those three championships they won as a trio somehow tainted because, well, it just wasn't right to have that much talent in the same uniform?

Yes, we know: Bird said he wouldn't want to team with Magic; he wanted to beat Magic. Same with Jordan. But that's missing the point. Bird didn't have to team with Magic because the Celtics had All-Star talent around Bird. Both he and Magic had two members each of the NBA's 50th anniversary team as teammates (Parish, McHale, Kareem, Worthy) -- plus one 50th anniversary team member at the end of his career (Archibald) was in the mix, too. So, yeah, Magic and Bird didn't really need each other.

And Jordan? This was the same player who grew weary of carrying the Bulls to the postseason, pre-Pippen, and then complained when Pippen, Horace Grant and B.J. Armstrong weren't yet mature enough to help beat the Pistons.

The plain truth is that every great player wants help. That's why Kobe Bryant, after temporarily deluding himself into thinking he could win a title without Shaquille O'Neal, gave the Lakers an ultimatum: Get me a sidekick, or else. That's why Chris Paul wants answers in New Orleans. And why LeBron finally got fed up and left Cleveland, leaving money on the table.

The real issue is a lack of superstar talent in the NBA, as compared to the Golden Age of the 1980s and '90s. And the blame can be directly traced to expansion. Would Bird and Magic and Jordan be so steadfastly against joining the "enemy" if they were playing today, where only a lucky handful of teams have more than one superstar on the roster? Given their strong desire to win, my gut tells me the answer is no. They would not be against the idea of being teammates.

Before expansion, a half-dozen teams, if not more, throbbed with talent. The Sixers were loaded with Julius Erving, Moses Malone (who heard applause, not jeers, when he hooked up with Dr. J, unlike LeBron), Maurice Cheeks, Andrew Toney and Bobby Jones. The Bucks had Sidney Moncrief, Jack Sikma, Bob Lanier, Terry Cummings and Ricky Pierce. The Hawks: Dominique Wilkins, Kevin Willis, Tree Rollins, Spud Webb, Doc Rivers. The Jazz: Darrell Griffith, Karl Malone, John Stockton, Mark Eaton. The Rockets: Ralph Sampson and Hakeem Olajuwon. The Pistons: Isiah Thomas, Joe Dumars, John Salley, Bill Laimbeer, Rodman, Rick Mahorn, Vinnie Johnson. And so on.

But the game changed once the NBA sprouted in such cities as Charlotte and Miami, Minnesota and Memphis, Toronto and New Orleans. The talent pool was diluted. Twenty years ago, nobody would view the current makeup of the Heat as a novelty. Nobody would call them a "Supreme Team" or emphasize their talent or worry about a Goliath ruining basketball, because Miami would look no different than the Lakers or Celtics or Sixers or Pistons. If anything, Miami would still trail those teams in the talent department. A notorious trash-talker, Bird would look at the Miami roster and snort: "Is that all you got?"

Miami is being sized up as a villain, a team to hate, if only because three All-Stars got together and decided to be teammates. LeBron has taken hits in the past month because of his ego, criticism justified to a degree, especially with regard to his prime-time special. But if his ego was so large, why did he decide to play in Wade's World? Why not stay in Cleveland and have a suffering city kiss his ring? And why would Wade, given his stature in Miami, share his stage with two other bold-print names?

Maybe it's because they want to win and they figure that, in a league loaded with one-star teams, uniting would be the best way.

If some people complain the Miami three weren't good enough individually to carry a team to a title, then some people have a curious double standard.

Shaun Powell is a veteran NBA writer and columnist. You can e-mail him here and follow him on twitter.

The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA, its clubs or Turner Broadcasting.

Registered User
Joined: 01/19/2009
Posts: 757
Points: 453

All the criticism is coming from poor sports. The Heat are going to be a smackdown on wheels for the next 6 seasons, what player in his right mind wouldn't want to be a part of that. Lebron has money, and will make money, and once they get the first ring this will all be forgotten.

You can't win a title in Cleveland, it is as close to a fact as it gets. They couldn't possibly be any better than they were these last 2 years, that team peaked.

The Bulls wont be able to keep Rose and Noah and Add James to Boozer. They would have been great for 2 years and then in flux.

The Knicks have huge question marks on every level of organization IMO and wouldn't be immediately competitive for a title. James and Stat and role players aren't quite enough.

The Nets..Lol never really had a shot same as the Clippers.

Now he lives in Sunny Azz Miami, playing with 2 of the top 10 players in the game, very close friends, with 2 of the best role players in the league, the best GM in the business and Second best coach in the business (no not Spoelstra)

One last pearl of Wisdom, no WAY that Spoelstra is coachign this team in the playoffs. I will literally be a monkeys uncle if he makes it past the All Star break. This is Rileys team.

Riley vs. Phil, Lebron vs. Kobe for the Finals of the Century and them some.

Tyrober's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/16/2009
Posts: 2984
Points: 8156
Although technically the both

Although technically the both Bosh and James were traded to the Heat they got to pick to go there. It seems as if people are giving them hell for wanting to win? Did people tell Kobe and Gasol that they were pathetic when Gasol got traded there? Did people tell KG, Pierce, and Allen that everyone now hates them because they will suit up every night together? It makes no sense to me how people feel fine about players getting traded to somewhere they want to go but for a player to get the choice of where to play and everyone says they are pathetic? I love the idea of a "superteam" because it will be very very marketable.

ShekiruBoom's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/26/2010
Posts: 420
Points: 658
Lol i love this kind of

Lol i love this kind of LeBron topics lol. I think one of the problem people have with this is that LeBron went to the Wade's team. If DWade and Bosh had come to the Cavs, there will not have been so much hate. Thats what I think the key point in this. That LeBron went to join other Hall of Famers to win instead of other Hall of Famers coming to LeBron.

Malik-Universal's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/08/2010
Posts: 3484
Points: 3339
powell is a phuckin

powell is a phuckin dumba$$.... magic was drafted by the lakers, worthy drafted by the lakers, wasnt jabbar traded to the lakers in like 72? they didnt have a &$#%#[email protected]!cin summit to plan this ahead of time.... same with the celtics... bird drafted by celtics, and mchale, true dennis johnson and parish werent drafted by the celtics, but i dont think they were solitified superstars wen they joined boston

stealsgalore's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/02/2010
Posts: 164
Points: 324
The Point

The point is that Magic and Bird played with other great players, it doesn't matter how they got there they played with great players.

In today's NBA its almost impossible to build a team that way, draft picks are harder to come by and expansion has diluted the talent field.

Lebron chose to play with other superstars the only way he knows how, the Cavs aren't going to get another high draft pick and their front office hasn't provided him with a legit sidekick. I don't agree with how he did it but the move does make basketball sense to me.

surve's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/19/2010
Posts: 2933
Points: 4604
@stealsgalore, that's exactly

@stealsgalore, that's exactly what I have been saying, also, dont forget, we now have the lottery which makes it nearly impossible to build a great team quick as well. how many times has the WORST team gotten the 1st pick since the lottery was introduced? I'll tell you....4. The one lottery pick that Cleveland did get since Lebron has been there was Luke Jackson. Where is he now? A lot of that blame goes to Cleveland as well, they couldve picked Al Jefferson. The lottery was put in to keep bad teams from tanking intentionally but it is actually hurting the league I think because normally, only one of the worst 3 teams gets a top 3 pick. This may be moot in cleveland's case because they did improve drastically after Lebron's arrival.

marcusfizer21's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/09/2009
Posts: 2641
Points: 5109
Why is did

Terry C U M M I N G S name got censored??? LOL

RSS: Syndicate content