lets say you was a starter on the kings.
your a player who does it all on the court off and on. the fans love you, the ladies love you, your teammates like you, you like the fans, the city, your family does too. but on the downside your team hasnt been in the playoffs in three seasons you been there. you have been coach by 4 diffrent coaches, the mangerment sucks. now they hire a new gm. who promises you hes gonna change it around, and bring you some help. but he wants one you to do one thing first. and thats resign. for four years 80 million. but you have 3 other teams after you. the knicks- 4 yrs 45 mill , spurs mid-level, and the pacers 5 yrs 60 mill. now the knicks are still the knicks , the spurs almost won the west, the pacers just miss the playoffs barley. now who do yuo choose.
In Order...which ones would you choose..
The Kings offer if they will give you $20 Million a year, if they want you that bad you have to take it.
A losing team that has a promising team and their young.
Take tha kings offer especially if I kno my team has a good yung nucleus and good chemistry
how old are you? if your early in your career, you obviously take the money, substantial difference from the other 3 options. if its later in your career and its all about the championship,and your hungry for the win, than you go spurs for your best shot at the title.
I simply wouldnt turn down $20m a year...
all day everyday. Anyone who answers different does'nt know what they are talking about.
It doesn't matter how old you are. 80 million dollars is 80 million dollars.
i would take the knicks cuz i simply would love the challenge of turning around a losing team and making them great again. plus i would love 2 play in d'antonis system
i take the 80 million