Iggy or Monti
most ppl had said Ellis was a better player then Iggy earlier today and i asked why but i didnt get an answer can someone please tell me their logic behind that one....Iggy is a better all around player and he can play defense...and ellis is really one dimensional...and really if he was on a championship team he would be a sixth man...while iggy can really be your number 2 option...please you guys tell me why...its like im doubting some ppl basketball knowledge here because of this...
iggy's a nice all around player but on a championship team he wouldn't be a #2 at all. on a legit chip contender he'd be a far improved mikael pietrus, except he would def be a starter. monta is 1 dimensional but he is VERY good at that dimension. he wouldn't be a #1 on a chip team. he'd be a pretty good #2 or a REALLY good #3. def not a sixth man tho. thaz just crazy.
can you name a one dimensional player on a #2 player on a championship team....i dont think so..monti was a 6th man and excelled at it...theres a reason why stephon curry on his team is getting more mention then him...simply cuz bye next year the team will be his...and usually your number #2 can play some kinda defense... and your comparison on iggy..come on..thats like me saying iggy is lebron james but doesnt score as much.....Im sorry bro you got it backward iggy is your number 2 or a great number 3..