the dust settles after the trade deadline
Now that the deadline has come and went there are some ? to be answered
Who got better. IMO... NY, CLEV, Dallas
who got worst IMO... Wash,
Did the Jamison trade make Cleveland better land LA, Boston when healthy, mainly LA... IMO... yes
Does Orlando have a chance to win the east, should they have made a move? IMO... no
What trade the was proposed that didn't happen should have happen? I read on hoophype that Memphis offered OJ and a 1 st pick and expiring contract to the Warrior's for Monta. I would have taken that in a min if I was a GM.
whtat other ? do you have and what answers can you come up with about my ?'s
NY got better?? Hmmm.. IDK about that man.. I mean maybe. They did get Cardinal after all. He is a Brian Scalabrine type game changer.. Excluding the playoffs last year where he actually helped..
I believe he still got game and I think Rodriquez with pt will be nice for them.
They got to athleitc from Boston to run all day in Dantoies system.
Not to mention they will have 30 mil in cap space for the summer with the expiring contracts.
The Bulls may not have gotten better this year but they have put themselves in great position to get some big FA for next year. Also, it may not have been at the deadline but Portland got a lot better with Camby.
Memphis offered OJ Mayo, an expiring contract and a first round pick to Golden State for Monta Ellis???
I don't belive that for one second lol.
Maybe NY will sign Mark Madsen...then I'm sold.
NY starting Lineup...
And then they don't play a center thinking this will save them money for FA somehow.