share

DeMarcus Cousins Rebounding Rating

blackflash234
Registered User
Joined: 01/25/2009
Posts: 536
Points: 802
Offline
DeMarcus Cousins Rebounding Rating

I think that DeMarcus Cousins rebounding rating needs to be a 10 out of 10 because the man averages 10 boards in just 21.3 minutes. Scouts may say that he lacks the heart to grab rebounds but anybody that can rebounds at he rate he rebounds means that he can rebound period. I think it's time that we see DeMarcus Cousins move pass Cole Aldrich in the mock draft don't you think?


gatorheels
gatorheels's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/25/2009
Posts: 3232
Points: 1493
Offline
Absolutely
Absolutely
esperanzafleet69
esperanzafleet69's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/19/2009
Posts: 1675
Points: 991
Offline
yeah... i think he'll go top

yeah... i think he'll go top 3

the I in win
the I in win's picture
Registered User
Joined: 11/28/2009
Posts: 2130
Points: 1559
Offline
should be the first big man

should be the first big man off the board.

Bryant24
Bryant24's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/27/2009
Posts: 1277
Points: 1488
Offline
I agree 100% cousins is

I agree 100% cousins is better at every aspect of the game maybe except for defense than aldrich cousins is best big man in the draft and is a top 5 pick if not three dude score in bunches lazy or not dude can rebound

Prospect21
Registered User
Joined: 01/29/2010
Posts: 89
Points: -28
Offline
People will fall in love

People will fall in love with Montiejunas.

Cousins reminds me of Moses Malone in terms of Rebounding. He should be a top 5 pick because of that alone. I believe he might go in the 5-10 range.

Grandmama
Grandmama's picture
Registered User
Joined: 09/20/2009
Posts: 2192
Points: 4349
Offline
Eddy Curry II

When this kid turns into Eddy Curry all of you will be shaking your heads wondering why....There are guys Cousins size all across the NBA and if you watch Kentucky's games you'll notice a lot of his boards are on smaller opponents who lack the size or skill to rebound with someone 6'11'' 270lbs. He could end up being a great pro, but if he doesn't put in enough work he will be Eddy Curry II.

Adi Joseph
Registered User
Joined: 06/22/2008
Posts: 460
Points: 512
Offline
Moses Malone? Are you

Moses Malone? Are you kidding me? Don't make comparisons if you haven't seen someone play. Moses was far more athletic and better at positioning himself.

Cousins scores and rebounds because he hogs the lane. He rarely even jumps for rebounds.

joecheck88
joecheck88's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 2804
Points: 2542
Offline
Who do you guys think will

Who do you guys think will be the better NBA player, Demarcus Cousins or Daniel Orton?

They are both great freshman bigmen. If demarcus could jump he would be the number 1 pick. Say what you want about him, he is impressive and is helping his stock.

Henry25
Henry25's picture
Registered User
Joined: 02/26/2009
Posts: 373
Points: 251
Offline
Moses wasn't that much of a

Moses wasn't that much of a better athlete than Demarcus to be completely honest. I actually really like that comparison. Demarcus just needs to get himself into some better condition

lalaila
lalaila's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/09/2009
Posts: 1832
Points: 1344
Offline
Yes..his rating should be

Yes..his rating should be around 100 all in all
1.Wall
2.Turner
3.Cousins IMO

the lake show
Registered User
Joined: 01/13/2010
Posts: 8202
Points: 1200
Offline
compared to moses?..thats a

compared to moses?..thats a horrible comparison. moses was a straight animal in hs and the nba. whats comparable about them? they both are black thats about it. i never saw him live but i watched plenty of tape that my father had and they arent comparable. moses playing now would eat him alive. that was a slap in the face to moses. and no lalaila his rating nor anyone elses shoul dbe 100. 100 should go to players like durant,beasley,duncan shaq as far as college. guys who are straight dominate not just really good

lalaila
lalaila's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/09/2009
Posts: 1832
Points: 1344
Offline
Why not Blake had 106, Rose

Why not Blake had 106, Rose 104, at the of the season Wall will be in the same range..and don't forget that his very solid 16-10-2 isn't typical 16-10-2..his PT is 21mpg!Man 21 minutes! that's scary i believe he would be 22-12-3 easily if his PT would be over 30. He is not that far away statistically from being that "dominant freshman"

the lake show
Registered User
Joined: 01/13/2010
Posts: 8202
Points: 1200
Offline
i didnt agree with 106 or

i didnt agree with 106 or rose 104 either. maybe because i view 100 as a shaq,lebron,duncan type. and although the 21 thing is impressive i dont put great stock in it. look at a player who puts up 8ppg in lets say 10min?...you could say in 40min he would lead the ncaa in scoring. you cant put full stock in it because its a guess. no one knows if the guy can play at that high of a level for 40min a more accurate way is to see what he produced when he played 30 or more minutes and average it out. look at ed davis last year as an example. im sure if you went by his minutes and did it by 30-40 his numbers would have been out of this world. lets not get carried away like some of ya'll do. if duncan shaq lebron were 100 does that mean cousins is still 100 as well in youre opinion?

willie wise fan
Registered User
Joined: 02/07/2010
Posts: 395
Points: 35
Offline
yeah i have even heard

yeah i have even heard debates about him moving ahead of wall but i dont see that happening but any team past the top couple who passes on him will regret it

RSS: Syndicate content