share

Nate The Great to LA???

Henry25
Henry25's picture
Registered User
Joined: 02/26/2009
Posts: 373
Points: 251
Offline
Nate The Great to LA???

So for the past couple of days on websites like hoopshype.com and hoopsworld.com I've been reading about a rumor that would send Nate Robinson to the Lakers. I want to know what you all think. Personally I think this would be great for LA, there bench has been super inconsistent and Nate would add instant scoring and would puck the tempo better than Farmar and Brown. Phil Jackson knows how to deal with difficult personalities better than anyone and Kobe would also keep him grounded. What do u all think????


Clyde-Glide10
Clyde-Glide10's picture
Registered User
Joined: 12/28/2009
Posts: 265
Points: -64
Offline
Who would NY get back?

Who would NY get back?

the lake show
Registered User
Joined: 01/13/2010
Posts: 8202
Points: 1200
Offline
im guessing farmar would be

im guessing farmar would be included which would be pretty good for the knicks. with that system farmar would do very well. this kid is alot better then people give him credit for but he doesnt get consitant minutes and the triangle isnt the best for his offense

bkballer
Registered User
Joined: 07/12/2009
Posts: 922
Points: 390
Offline
Nate and Jeffries for Farmar

Nate and Jeffries for Farmar and Morrison, I would love that. Lakers don't care about 2010 free agency and Jeffries can actually be a decent player for them off the bench playing 15-20 minutes and doing the hustle plays.

the lake show
Registered User
Joined: 01/13/2010
Posts: 8202
Points: 1200
Offline
i wouldnt mind that trade. i

i wouldnt mind that trade. i think jefferies would fit in very well as well as nate off the bench . i also think morrison would play pretty well out in ny. would probably only be a one year deal for nate because i doubt the lakers would pay him what he thinks hes worth next year

foxman2sly
Registered User
Joined: 07/21/2009
Posts: 42
Points: 64
Offline
No way

I like Nate the Great but he's a headcase and we already have Artest. BTW Farmar has picked it up lately and has even closed some close games out lately.

the lake show
Registered User
Joined: 01/13/2010
Posts: 8202
Points: 1200
Offline
artest hasnt been a headache

artest hasnt been a headache though and hasnt been one for years

llperez
llperez's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/13/2009
Posts: 12024
Points: 12119
Offline
i like nate a lot. But i

i like nate a lot. But i doubt the lakers pay him what he wants and his shoot first mentallity might not fit with the lakers. I say hold onto farmar. And i defenitely don't want jared jeffries becasue now with walton back i doubt jeffries would even get pt for the lakers.

RSS: Syndicate content