share

Who do You Want on Your Team?

The8thDeadlySin
The8thDeadlySin's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/02/2008
Posts: 4390
Points: 5839
Offline
Who do You Want on Your Team?

Will all the talk about Nate Robinson, I found myself questioning why anyone would want him with what is available on the market. I understand that teams may not want to take his contract but IMO, T-Mac is still a better fit for anyone than Nate. Would you rather have a 5'9 SG that cant play defense and only looks to score or a 6'8 SG who cant play defense and only looks to score. With T-Mac's height, he would almost play accidental defense.

Anyway:

Who would you rather have on your team, Nate or T-Mac?


the I in win
the I in win's picture
Registered User
Joined: 11/28/2009
Posts: 2128
Points: 1554
Offline
for cleveland i would want

for cleveland i would want tmac because we have a bunch of short guards even though i think nate is better.

tonyl33
Registered User
Joined: 01/08/2009
Posts: 237
Points: 26
Offline
Nuggest

Denver should really try to get T-Mac. This would complete their team to be at the top to go head to head with Lakers. Imagine the line up; Billups, T-Mac, Melo, KMart, Nene. Not the best front court, but the back court looks mighty deadly. They'll give Lakers trouble when they match up.

jerb2011
Registered User
Joined: 05/26/2009
Posts: 469
Points: 589
Offline
Thunder

Dwight Howard. He's young, athletic, big, can rebound, and can block shots. the Thunder could make the playoffs, if not the championship with this team: Westbrook, Sefolosha/Harden, Durant, Green, Howard

The lake show2
The lake show2's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/26/2009
Posts: 6717
Points: 1248
Offline
denver with tmac would give

denver with tmac would give the lakeshow problems..i still think we'd win though. in order to really beat the lakers would be to dominate down low. thats what really hurts teams( and kobe of course)..because there iusnt a team that can match odom,artest,gasol,bynum when they are playing at there best

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11521
Offline
Give me Nate. He be a good

Give me Nate. He be a good spark off the bench. The 76ers don't need to give T-Mac starter minutes, which is what he'd command.

td8118
Registered User
Joined: 04/09/2009
Posts: 433
Points: -2
Offline
I dont think any team gets

I dont think any team gets better with Nate...Maybe just the Suns but he is not a difference maker....Watching him play for the Knicks, he is a player with skills, but IMO he will take more away from a team then add to it

festar35
Registered User
Joined: 05/21/2009
Posts: 1643
Points: 2855
Offline
Give me T-Mac he has a

Give me T-Mac he has a bigger expiring contract.

tonyl33
Registered User
Joined: 01/08/2009
Posts: 237
Points: 26
Offline
Quincy

That's why I said, give me T-Mac. There isn't anything you can do to match, Bynum, Odom, and Gasol but you can counter their back court. Fisher, Kobe and Artest, Counter with Billups, T-Mac, and Melo. Have Billups tear up the PG position is the key. Because Kobe and Artest will have to play honest defense on T-mac and Melo. Expose the Laker weakness is the only way to win.

The lake show2
The lake show2's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/26/2009
Posts: 6717
Points: 1248
Offline
hmmm interesting but remeber

hmmm interesting but remeber this isnt old tmac..probably would take him a good year to get back to being even close to what he used to be( i dont think he will ever be back to what he used to be)..i think they have a chance with the old tmac but i think youre thinking of tmac being like he used to be and after that injury the chances of that happening is very low.

RSS: Syndicate content