Not trade Miller. He has been playing great recently. Get rid of Blake...PLEASE!!!! Package some deal including Blake and Outlaw maybe even throw in Bayless...We need someone who can play great defense. No more shooters...please KP.
Im telling you.
David Lee for Bayless and Webster would be a great deal.
I think they will trade Miller.
Don't like David Lee on the Blazers. I mean I guess it's ok...Would it be LA at center and Lee at PF while Pryzbilla plays either position?
David Lee is a bad defender. We don't need any more of those. And, no way we're trading Miller. Not happening at all...Especially since Blake or Bayless (maybe both) will be traded!
No...you HOPE he is not traded. He can be traded.
Yea. It would be Lee- Aldridge combo with Joel Pryzbilla as a 4-5 guy.
I have no idea what the Blazers are going to do...I'd rather have a wing than a post player at this point. Juwan has been playing well at the 4 and 5...Obviously he's not the long term solution though.
yeah im not likeing lee..LA at center would be pretty bad. and isnt ny trying not to add any more contracts unless its a one year deal?..i think the miller trade has alot to do with roy. you cant trade blake because roy feels comfortable with him and blake lets him handle the ball more. you gotta keep youre star happy even if it may hurt youre team
Everyone in Portland wants Blake gone...I'm tired of Blake...Honestly, if he doesn't hit jumpers he might as well be on the bench. B-Roy still get's the ball plenty even with Miller...Miller isn't that greedy. No matter who's in the line up, Roy/LA are still taking all of the shots in the 4th quarter.
I also think the Washington Wizards as a whole should be on the trading block
It'll be sad to see Nate go because of his excitement, but in the end i'll be happier
Knicks have been playing MUCH better without him, but he does have the right to veto a trade, I wonder if he'll use it...continue to ride on the Knicks bench..or go elsewhere and get an opportunity to play
&Is it just me or is anyone else dying to see a trade? With every team trying to preserve capspace....way less trades have been made, since this season started, only 1 trade has happened, last season at this point, 5 trades were made
The Knicks won 4 in a row...amazing.
I think we can get alot for Nate.
Nobody wants Nate IMO...
im not saying miller is greedy but roy has already voiced his displeasure with miller. i dont think the players want blake gone because they have said they liek him. i can believe the fans might have but who cares if the fans wants someone gone or wants them to stay. you dont trade or keep players by what the fans want. they can want all they want to but they will still come to the games so you just ignore them
People will be interested in Nate. He can score off the bench in a flash.
alot for nate Q?..im sorry but no one wants him for the money he wants. hes just not vauleble enough
It sure would...Outlaw is worth on a lot to some teams and he could be a 17-20 ppg scorer on a team that will give him big minutes. Outlaw just doesn't fit in with Portland and he is a terrible defender and has a low bball IQ.
im not talking alot in value overall. Im talking alot of help for the Knicks.
I would love a Robinson- Foye deal or a Robinson- Sessions deal
Outlaw just doesn't fit in with Portland and he is a terrible defender and has a low bball IQ.
So if Portland knows that..why would teams trade for him? Teams will scout him. The Knicks already did, that's why they didn't want him
Maybe cause he is a really good scorer, is young, extremely athletic and has mismatch potential? You can't always look at the negatives. He just doesn't get enough PT in Portland to get into a groove offensively.
eh. I never was a real fan of Outlaw. He can play but I don't he's a starter in his prime.
I rather have Martell Webster.
Can be a starter no question...Or he could be an amzing 6th man...He can be a 17+ppg type of guy and he could be a good rebounder if he ever wanted to be LOL.
Whos more likely to go, Miller, Robinson, Bass, Gortat, or Sessions?
Robinson can veto any trade, plus I dont think alot of teams wnt him...
And the other 4 are all on multi-year contracts, and none have panned out as expected thus far
Kahn won't give Sessions up without getting a young SG with potential or a 1st round pick projected in the Top 20.
i think nate is the most likely to get traded unless they are really adement on getting rid of curry